• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在自发言语中重复词语。

Repeating words in spontaneous speech.

作者信息

Clark H H, Wasow T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stanford University, CA 94305-2130, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 1998 Dec;37(3):201-42. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0693.

DOI:10.1006/cogp.1998.0693
PMID:9892548
Abstract

Speakers often repeat the first word of major constituents, as in, "I uh I wouldn't be surprised at that." Repeats like this divide into four stages: an initial commitment to the constituent (with "I"); the suspension of speech; a hiatus in speaking (filled with "uh"); and a restart of the constituent ("I wouldn't."). An analysis of all repeated articles and pronouns in two large corpora of spontaneous speech shows that the four stages reflect different principles. Speakers are more likely to make a premature commitment, immediately suspending their speech, as both the local constituent and the constituent containing it become more complex. They plan some of these suspensions from the start as preliminary commitments to what they are about to say. And they are more likely to restart a constituent the more their stopping has disrupted its delivery. We argue that the principles governing these stages are general and not specific to repeats.

摘要

说话者常常重复主要成分的第一个词,比如:“我,呃,我对此不会感到惊讶。” 这样的重复分为四个阶段:对成分的初始承诺(以 “我” 开头);言语的停顿;说话中的间隙(用 “呃” 填充);以及成分的重新开始(“我不会”)。对两个大型自然语言语料库中所有重复的冠词和代词进行分析表明,这四个阶段反映了不同的原则。随着局部成分及其包含的成分变得更加复杂,说话者更有可能过早做出承诺,随即停顿言语。他们从一开始就计划了其中一些停顿,作为对即将要说内容的初步承诺。而且,他们停顿得越久,对成分传递的干扰越大,就越有可能重新开始这个成分。我们认为,支配这些阶段的原则是普遍的,并非重复所特有的。

相似文献

1
Repeating words in spontaneous speech.在自发言语中重复词语。
Cogn Psychol. 1998 Dec;37(3):201-42. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0693.
2
Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking.在自然口语中使用“呃”和“嗯”。
Cognition. 2002 May;84(1):73-111. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00017-3.
3
Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history.词汇使用频率预测了整个印欧语系历史中的词汇演变速度。
Nature. 2007 Oct 11;449(7163):717-20. doi: 10.1038/nature06176.
4
Language, thought, and real nouns.语言、思维与实名词。
Cognition. 2009 Jun;111(3):329-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
5
How speakers interrupt themselves in managing problems in speaking: evidence from self-repairs.说话者在处理言语问题时如何自我打断:来自自我修正的证据。
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):837-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
6
Multilevel modeling of between-speaker and within-speaker variation in spontaneous speech tempo.自发语速中说话者间和说话者内变异的多层次建模。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Feb;123(2):1104-13. doi: 10.1121/1.2821762.
7
Constituent structure and linear order in language production: evidence from subject-verb agreement.语言产出中的成分结构与线性顺序:来自主谓一致的证据
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):891-904. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.891.
8
It's the way that you, er, say it: hesitations in speech affect language comprehension.关键在于你说话的方式,呃,说话时的犹豫会影响语言理解。
Cognition. 2007 Dec;105(3):658-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010. Epub 2006 Dec 14.
9
The gender congruency effect and the selection of freestanding and bound morphemes: evidence from croatian.性别一致性效应与自由语素和黏着语素的选择:来自克罗地亚语的证据
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1270-82. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1270.
10
Word length and vowel duration in apraxia of speech: the use of relative measures.言语失用症中的单词长度和元音时长:相对测量方法的应用。
Brain Lang. 2001 Dec;79(3):397-406. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2494.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and Methods in Annotating Natural Speech for Neurolinguistic Research.神经语言学研究中自然言语标注的挑战与方法
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2025 Sep 5;6. doi: 10.1162/nol.a.12. eCollection 2025.
2
Limited learning and adaptation in disfluency processing among older adults.老年人在言语不流畅处理方面的学习和适应能力有限。
Psychol Aging. 2025 Jun;40(4):439-447. doi: 10.1037/pag0000887. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
3
Disfluencies reflect a... uh... competition between response options: Evidence from a drift diffusion analysis.言语不流畅反映了……呃……反应选项之间的竞争:来自漂移扩散分析的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Aug;32(4):1750-1760. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02638-6. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
4
Pausing behavior of late bilingual and monolingual English speakers.晚期双语和单语英语使用者的停顿行为。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 27;9(11):e21322. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21322. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Information-theoretic principles in incremental language production.信息论原理在增量语言生成中的应用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Sep 26;120(39):e2220593120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220593120. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
6
Semantic interference affects speech production by increasing disfluencies, not errors.语义干扰通过增加言语不流畅性而非错误来影响言语产生。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jun 28;10(6):230006. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230006. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Can object identification difficulty be predicted based on disfluencies and eye-movements in connected speech?基于连续言语中的不流畅和眼动能否预测物体识别困难?
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 14;18(3):e0281589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281589. eCollection 2023.
8
On the Relationship between Speech Intelligibility and Fluency Indicators among English-Speaking Individuals with Parkinson's Diseases.帕金森病患者英语口语清晰度与流畅性指标的关系。
Behav Neurol. 2022 Oct 3;2022:1224680. doi: 10.1155/2022/1224680. eCollection 2022.
9
Speech Disfluencies in Consecutive Interpreting by Student Interpreters: The Role of Language Proficiency, Working Memory, and Anxiety.学生译员连续口译中的言语不流畅现象:语言能力、工作记忆和焦虑的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 27;13:881778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.881778. eCollection 2022.
10
It's about time! Time as a parameter for lexical and syntactic processing: an eye-tracking-while-listening investigation.正是时候!时间作为词汇和句法加工的一个参数:一项听时眼动追踪研究。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2022;37(1):42-62. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2021.1941147. Epub 2021 Jun 14.