Barkana Y, Stein M, Maor R, Lynn M, Eldad A
Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Surgeon General Headquarters.
J Trauma. 1999 Jan;46(1):176-80. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199901000-00030.
Prehospital blood transfusion for hemorrhaging trauma patients has been used infrequently and is controversial. Currently, there is no satisfactory nonsanguineous fluid therapy for use during prolonged transport, such as in military or rural trauma.
We retrospectively reviewed prehospital data and hospital charts of all trauma patients in Israel who had received prehospital blood transfusion during a period of 30 months.
Forty patients received 60 U of Rh-positive type O packed red blood cells. Mean time from injury to hospital admission was 120 minutes. Twenty-one of 31 patients admitted to the hospital alive (68%) received additional blood transfusions during the initial resuscitation phase, justifying the prehospital transfusion. Of nine documented admissions with hemoglobin of less than 7 g/dL, one patient died of exsanguination. There was one case of a minor adverse reaction that could be attributed to prehospital transfusion.
Prehospital blood transfusion is justified in certain trauma patients, especially when long prehospital transport is required. Blood may be safely maintained and used by physicians with little experience in care of major trauma.
对出血性创伤患者进行院前输血的情况并不常见,且存在争议。目前,对于长时间转运(如军事或农村创伤情况),尚无令人满意的非血液液体治疗方法。
我们回顾性分析了以色列在30个月期间接受院前输血的所有创伤患者的院前数据和医院病历。
40例患者接受了60单位Rh阳性O型浓缩红细胞。从受伤到入院的平均时间为120分钟。31例入院存活的患者中有21例(68%)在初始复苏阶段接受了额外输血,这证明了院前输血的合理性。在9例记录的血红蛋白低于7 g/dL的入院病例中,1例患者死于失血过多。有1例轻微不良反应可能归因于院前输血。
对于某些创伤患者,特别是需要长时间院前转运的患者,院前输血是合理的。经验较少的医生也可安全地保存和使用血液来治疗严重创伤。