• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

香港重症监护后的长期结局及功能健康状况

Long-term outcome and functional health status following intensive care in Hong Kong.

作者信息

Short T G, Buckley T A, Rowbottom M Y, Wong E, Oh T E

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1999 Jan;27(1):51-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199901000-00026.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-199901000-00026
PMID:9934893
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess mortality and functional health status of patients at 1 yr following admission to a multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) in Hong Kong. To determine which factors are associated with a poor long-term outcome.

DESIGN

Prospective data collection and review.

SETTING

A 14-bed multidisciplinary ICU in a 1,400-bed tertiary care university hospital.

PATIENTS

Data from 2,268 consecutive patients admitted over a 2.5-yr period was analyzed, including follow-up at 1 yr in 853 adult survivors.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The patients' clinical details and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores were recorded on day 2 of admission and reviewed at time of discharge or death. The mean APACHE II score on admission was 18. Survival status at 1 yr was ascertained and the sickness impact profile (SIP) scored as a measure of functional health status for survivors. Sixty-five percent of patients survived to discharge from hospital and 44% of patients were known to survive to 1 yr; 6% of patients could not be traced at 1 yr. Functional health status was assessed in 85% of eligible adult patients. Survivors to 1 yr were younger than nonsurvivors and had lower APACHE II scores. The median SIP score was 5.1, (25th and 75th percentiles: 0 to 15), and 76% of patients had SIP scores < or = 15, i.e., normal health to moderate disability. Five percent of the patients were not working or had retired for health-related reasons. Stepwise logistic regression to identify factors associated with poor functional health status defined as a SIP score >15 at 1 yr found increasing age, cardiac/ respiratory arrest, intracranial hemorrhage, and trauma to be associated with poor outcomes. A correlation was found between APACHE II scores and SIP scores (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.13, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The SIP scores indicated that the majority of patients who survived to 1 yr after ICU admission enjoyed reasonable functional health status. A poor functional health status at 1 yr did not relate to the severity of the acute illness suffered, but appeared to relate to the prognosis of the underlying disease process.

摘要

目的

评估香港一家多学科重症监护病房(ICU)收治患者入院1年后的死亡率和功能健康状况。确定哪些因素与不良的长期预后相关。

设计

前瞻性数据收集与回顾。

地点

一所拥有1400张床位的三级护理大学医院中的一间设有14张床位的多学科ICU。

患者

分析了2.5年期间连续收治入院的2268例患者的数据,包括853例成年幸存者的1年随访情况。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

在入院第2天记录患者的临床详细信息和急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分,并在出院或死亡时进行复查。入院时APACHE II评分的平均值为18分。确定了1年时的生存状况,并对幸存者的疾病影响概况(SIP)进行评分,作为功能健康状况的一项指标。65%的患者存活至出院,已知44%的患者存活至1年;6%的患者在1年时无法追踪到。85%符合条件的成年患者接受了功能健康状况评估。存活至1年的患者比未存活者更年轻,APACHE II评分更低。SIP评分中位数为5.1(第25和第75百分位数:0至15),76%的患者SIP评分≤15,即健康状况正常至中度残疾。5%的患者因健康相关原因未工作或已退休。采用逐步逻辑回归分析确定与1年时功能健康状况不佳(定义为SIP评分>15)相关的因素,发现年龄增加、心脏/呼吸骤停、颅内出血和创伤与不良预后相关。APACHE II评分与SIP评分之间存在相关性(Spearman相关系数=0.13,p<0.001)。

结论

SIP评分表明,大多数ICU入院后存活至1年的患者功能健康状况良好。1年时功能健康状况不佳与所患急性疾病的严重程度无关,而似乎与基础疾病进程的预后有关。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcome and functional health status following intensive care in Hong Kong.香港重症监护后的长期结局及功能健康状况
Crit Care Med. 1999 Jan;27(1):51-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199901000-00026.
2
Verification of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit.香港一间重症监护病房中急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估评分系统的验证
Crit Care Med. 1993 May;21(5):698-705. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199305000-00013.
3
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Glasgow coma scores as predictors of outcome from intensive care after cardiac arrest.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)及格拉斯哥昏迷评分作为心脏骤停后重症监护结局的预测指标。
Crit Care Med. 1991 Dec;19(12):1465-73. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199112000-00005.
4
Outcomes of critically ill elderly patients: is high-dependency care for geriatric patients worthwhile?重症老年患者的治疗结果:老年患者的高依赖护理是否值得?
Crit Care Med. 1999 Nov;27(11):2351-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199911000-00005.
5
Long-term functional outcome after intensive care.重症监护后的长期功能转归
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Jan;47(1):18-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01896.x.
6
Outcome and prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit.入住重症监护病房的重症癌症患者的结局及预后因素
Crit Care Med. 2000 May;28(5):1322-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200005000-00011.
7
Predictors of short- and long-term survival in HIV-infected patients admitted to the ICU.入住重症监护病房的HIV感染患者短期和长期生存的预测因素。
Chest. 1998 Feb;113(2):421-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.2.421.
8
Evaluation of predictive ability of APACHE II system and hospital outcome in Canadian intensive care unit patients.评估APACHE II系统对加拿大重症监护病房患者的预测能力及医院治疗结果。
Crit Care Med. 1995 Jul;23(7):1177-83. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199507000-00005.
9
Short- and long-term survival of nonsurgical intensive care patients and its relation to diagnosis, severity of disease, age and comorbidities.非手术重症监护患者的短期和长期生存情况及其与诊断、疾病严重程度、年龄和合并症的关系。
Curr Aging Sci. 2009 Dec;2(3):240-8. doi: 10.2174/1874609810902030240.
10
Long-term survival after intensive care unit admission with sepsis.脓毒症患者入住重症监护病房后的长期生存情况。
Crit Care Med. 1995 Jun;23(6):1040-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199506000-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
Quadrimodal distribution of death after trauma suggests that critical injury is a potentially terminal disease.创伤后死亡的四峰分布表明,严重损伤是一种潜在的终末期疾病。
J Crit Care. 2015 Jun;30(3):656.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
2
Evaluation of functional independence after discharge from the intensive care unit.重症监护病房出院后功能独立性评估。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2013 Apr-Jun;25(2):93-8. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20130019.
3
Health-related quality of life of long-term survivors of intensive care: changes after intensive care treatment. Experience of an Austrian intensive care unit.
长期重症监护幸存者的健康相关生活质量:重症监护治疗后的变化。奥地利重症监护病房的经验。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012 Sep;124(17-18):624-32. doi: 10.1007/s00508-012-0224-z. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
4
Quality of life after stay in surgical intensive care unit.外科重症监护病房住院后的生活质量。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2007 Jul 24;7:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-7-8.
5
Long-term survival from intensive care: a review.重症监护的长期生存:综述
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1306-15. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2744-8. Epub 2005 Aug 24.
6
Quality of life in adult survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of the literature.危重症成年幸存者的生活质量:文献系统综述
Intensive Care Med. 2005 May;31(5):611-20. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2592-6. Epub 2005 Apr 1.
7
Quality of life after complicated elective surgery requiring intensive care.复杂择期手术后需要重症监护的生活质量。
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Aug;30(8):1594-601. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2260-2. Epub 2004 Apr 15.
8
Quality of life and dialysis decisions in critically ill patients with acute renal failure.急性肾衰竭重症患者的生活质量与透析决策
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Sep;29(9):1589-93. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1837-5. Epub 2003 Jun 18.
9
Changes in health-related quality of life from 6 months to 2 years after discharge from intensive care.重症监护病房出院后6个月至2年期间与健康相关的生活质量变化。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Mar 24;1:2. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-2.
10
Surviving intensive care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable.重症监护生存报告:2002年布鲁塞尔圆桌会议报告
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Mar;29(3):368-77. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1624-8. Epub 2003 Jan 21.