Oberste M S, Maher K, Kilpatrick D R, Pallansch M A
Respiratory and Enteric Viruses Branch, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
J Virol. 1999 Mar;73(3):1941-8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.3.1941-1948.1999.
Sixty-six human enterovirus serotypes have been identified by serum neutralization, but the molecular determinants of the serotypes are unknown. Since the picornavirus VP1 protein contains a number of neutralization domains, we hypothesized that the VP1 sequence should correspond with neutralization (serotype) and, hence, with phylogenetic lineage. To test this hypothesis and to analyze the phylogenetic relationships among the human enteroviruses, we determined the complete VP1 sequences of the prototype strains of 47 human enterovirus serotypes and 10 antigenic variants. Our sequences, together with those available from GenBank, comprise a database of complete VP1 sequences for all 66 human enterovirus serotypes plus additional strains of seven serotypes. Phylogenetic trees constructed from complete VP1 sequences produced the same four major clusters as published trees based on partial VP2 sequences; in contrast to the VP2 trees, however, in the VP1 trees strains of the same serotype were always monophyletic. In pairwise comparisons of complete VP1 sequences, enteroviruses of the same serotype were clearly distinguished from those of heterologous serotypes, and the limits of intraserotypic divergence appeared to be about 25% nucleotide sequence difference or 12% amino acid sequence difference. Pairwise comparisons suggested that coxsackie A11 and A15 viruses should be classified as strains of the same serotype, as should coxsackie A13 and A18 viruses. Pairwise identity scores also distinguished between enteroviruses of different clusters and enteroviruses from picornaviruses of different genera. The data suggest that VP1 sequence comparisons may be valuable in enterovirus typing and in picornavirus taxonomy by assisting in the genus assignment of unclassified picornaviruses.
通过血清中和试验已鉴定出66种人肠道病毒血清型,但其血清型的分子决定因素尚不清楚。由于小RNA病毒VP1蛋白包含多个中和结构域,我们推测VP1序列应与中和作用(血清型)相对应,因此也应与系统发育谱系相对应。为了验证这一假设并分析人肠道病毒之间的系统发育关系,我们测定了47种人肠道病毒血清型和10种抗原变异体原型株的完整VP1序列。我们的序列与从GenBank获得的序列一起,构成了一个包含所有66种人肠道病毒血清型完整VP1序列以及另外7种血清型毒株的数据库。根据完整VP1序列构建的系统发育树产生了与基于部分VP2序列发表的树相同的四个主要簇;然而,与VP2树不同的是,在VP1树中,同一血清型的毒株总是单系的。在完整VP1序列的成对比较中,同一血清型的肠道病毒与异源血清型的肠道病毒明显区分开来,血清型内差异的限度似乎约为25%的核苷酸序列差异或12%的氨基酸序列差异。成对比较表明,柯萨奇A11和A15病毒应归为同一血清型的毒株,柯萨奇A13和A18病毒也应如此。成对同一性得分也区分了不同簇的肠道病毒和来自不同属小RNA病毒的肠道病毒。这些数据表明,VP1序列比较在肠道病毒分型和小RNA病毒分类学中可能具有重要价值,有助于未分类小RNA病毒的属归属。