Klosterkötter W, Gono E
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1976 Jul;162(1-2):51-69.
There is no evidence to date that passive smoking leads in the long run to typical smokers' diseases or to an increased health risk in an average healthy person. There are no plausible reasons to justify the assumption that such disturbances develop in passive smokers in the short term. Exposure to tobacco smoke can, under unfavourable conditions, lead to temporary irritation and impair the feeling of well-being which some persons may experience as a considerable nuisance. There are groups of persons of increased sensitivity and predisposition towards health risks, such as asthmatics and small children. These persons should not be exposed to tobacco smoke. There is the problem of individually determined smell interference by tobacco smoke. Admittedly, numerous questions await still an answer, but there is enough time to clarify them at leisure since passive smoking entails no acute danger of poisoning (cf. Lit. No. 15). In this field the most important task is to study in detail the problem of nuisance caused by smoking, with regard to both the prevailing law and to the demands of air hygiene. A detailed comment on the verdict passed by the Administrative Court of Schleswig closes with the phrase: "The prevention of the detrimental effects to health caused by tobacco smoke constitutes a preeminent task for the public health service and health policy".
迄今为止,尚无证据表明被动吸烟长期会导致典型的吸烟者疾病,或使一般健康人的健康风险增加。也没有合理的理由支持被动吸烟者短期内会出现此类健康问题的假设。在不利条件下,接触烟草烟雾会导致暂时的不适,并损害一些人可能会觉得相当讨厌的幸福感。有一些人群对健康风险的敏感度和易感性较高,如哮喘患者和儿童。这些人不应接触烟草烟雾。存在烟草烟雾对个人造成气味干扰的问题。诚然,众多问题仍有待解答,但由于被动吸烟不存在急性中毒危险(参见文献编号15),有足够的时间从容地加以澄清。在这一领域,最重要的任务是详细研究吸烟造成困扰的问题,既要考虑现行法律,也要考虑空气卫生的要求。对石勒苏益格行政法院判决的详细评论最后指出:“预防烟草烟雾对健康造成的有害影响是公共卫生服务和卫生政策的首要任务”。