Shreve M R, Butler S, Kaplowitz H J, Rabin H R, Stokes D, Light M, Regelmann W E
University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Mar;37(3):753-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.3.753-757.1999.
Investigators participating in the Epidemiologic Study of Cystic Fibrosis project began to collect microbiological, pulmonary, and nutritional data on cystic fibrosis (CF) patients at 180 North American sites in 1994. Part of this study was a survey undertaken in August 1995 to determine microbiology laboratory practices with regard to pulmonary specimens from CF patients. The survey included a section on test ordering, completed by a site clinician, and a section on test performance and reporting, completed by each site's clinical microbiology laboratory staff. Seventy-nine percent of the surveys were returned. There was intersite consistency of microbiology laboratory practices in most cases. The majority of sites follow most of the CF Foundation consensus conference recommendations. There were differences in the frequency at which specimens for culture were obtained, in the use of selective media for Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae, and in the use of a prolonged incubation for Burkholderia cepacia. These variations in practice contribute to prevalence differences among sites and may result in differences in clinical care.
参与囊性纤维化项目流行病学研究的调查人员于1994年开始在北美180个地点收集囊性纤维化(CF)患者的微生物学、肺部和营养数据。该研究的一部分是在1995年8月进行的一项调查,以确定关于CF患者肺部标本的微生物学实验室操作。该调查包括由现场临床医生完成的检测项目填写部分,以及由每个现场的临床微生物学实验室工作人员完成的检测操作和报告部分。79%的调查问卷被收回。在大多数情况下,各地点的微生物学实验室操作具有一致性。大多数地点遵循了CF基金会共识会议的大多数建议。在获取培养标本的频率、用于金黄色葡萄球菌和流感嗜血杆菌的选择性培养基的使用以及洋葱伯克霍尔德菌的延长培养时间的使用方面存在差异。这些操作上的差异导致了各地点患病率的差异,并可能导致临床护理的差异。