Suppr超能文献

生活质量数据的自动收集:纸质问卷与计算机触摸屏问卷的比较

Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires.

作者信息

Velikova G, Wright E P, Smith A B, Cull A, Gould A, Forman D, Perren T, Stead M, Brown J, Selby P J

机构信息

Imperial Cancer Research Fund Cancer Medicine Research Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1999 Mar;17(3):998-1007. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.998.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate alternative automated methods of collecting data on quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients. After initial evaluation of a range of technologies, we compared computer touch-screen questionnaires with paper questionnaires scanned by optical reading systems in terms of patients' acceptance, data quality, and reliability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a randomized cross-over trial, 149 cancer patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, version 2.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) on paper and on a touch screen. In a further test-retest study, 81 patients completed the electronic version of the questionnaires twice, with a time interval of 3 hours between questionnaires.

RESULTS

Fifty-two percent of the patients preferred the touch screen to paper; 24% had no preference. The quality of the data collected with the touch-screen system was good, with no missed responses. At the group level, the differences between scores obtained with the two modes of administration of the instruments were small, suggesting equivalence for most of the QOL scales, with the possible exception of the emotional, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting scales and the appetite item, where patients tended to give more positive responses on the touch screen. At the individual patient level, the agreement was good, with a kappa coefficient from 0.57 to 0.77 and percent global agreement from 61% to 97%. The electronic questionnaire had good test-retest reliability, with correlation coefficients between the two administrations from 0.78 to 0.95, kappa coefficients of agreement from 0.55 to 0.90, and percent global agreement from 56% to 100%.

CONCLUSION

Computer touch-screen QOL questionnaires were well accepted by cancer patients, with good data quality and reliability.

摘要

目的

评估收集癌症患者生活质量(QOL)数据的替代自动化方法。在对一系列技术进行初步评估后,我们比较了计算机触摸屏问卷与光学阅读系统扫描的纸质问卷在患者接受度、数据质量和可靠性方面的差异。

患者与方法

在一项随机交叉试验中,149名癌症患者通过纸质问卷和触摸屏完成了欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷30(EORTC QLQ-C30)第2.0版以及医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。在另一项重测研究中,81名患者两次完成问卷电子版,两次问卷之间间隔3小时。

结果

52%的患者更喜欢触摸屏问卷而非纸质问卷;24%的患者无偏好。通过触摸屏系统收集的数据质量良好,无漏答情况。在组水平上,两种问卷发放方式所得分数之间的差异较小,表明大多数生活质量量表具有等效性,但情感、疲劳、恶心/呕吐量表以及食欲项目可能除外,在这些项目上患者在触摸屏上倾向于给出更积极的回答。在个体患者水平上,一致性良好,kappa系数为0.57至0.77,总体一致率为61%至97%。电子问卷具有良好的重测可靠性,两次问卷发放之间的相关系数为0.78至0.95,一致性kappa系数为0.55至0.90,总体一致率为56%至100%。

结论

计算机触摸屏生活质量问卷被癌症患者广泛接受,数据质量和可靠性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验