• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种单剂量米非司酮作为紧急避孕方法的比较:一项随机试验。排卵后生育调节方法特别工作组。

Comparison of three single doses of mifepristone as emergency contraception: a randomised trial. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation.

出版信息

Lancet. 1999 Feb 27;353(9154):697-702.

PMID:10073511
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mifepristone is a highly effective and well-tolerated emergency contraceptive when given in a dose of 600 mg within 72 h of unprotected coitus. We assessed whether the same effectiveness can be achieved with lower doses of mifepristone (50 mg and 10 mg) and a longer postcoital treatment period (120 h).

METHODS

We undertook a multicentre, single-masked, randomised trial in 11 family-planning clinics in Australia, China, Finland, Georgia, the UK, and the USA. 1717 healthy women with regular menstrual cycles who requested emergency contraception within 120 h of unprotected coitus were randomly assigned to three treatment groups.

FINDINGS

32 women were lost to follow-up and one was pregnant before treatment. The 600 mg, 50 mg, and 10 mg groups did not differ in the proportions of pregnancies (seven [1.3%] of 559, six [1.1%] of 560, and seven [1.2%] of 565). Two pregnancies (both in the 50 mg group) were tubal. Among women without further acts of intercourse, treatment delay did not appear to influence the effectiveness. No major side-effects occurred, except a delay in the onset of next menses, significantly (p<.001) related to the mifepristone dose.

INTERPRETATION

Lowering the dose of mifepristone sixty-fold did not decrease its effectiveness as an emergency contraceptive under typical use, though a study of this size cannot exclude differences in effectiveness up to almost three-fold. Lower doses of mifepristone were associated with less disturbance of the menstrual cycle. Thus, a dose as low as 10 mg seems preferable to the 600 mg dose.

摘要

背景

米非司酮在无保护性交72小时内服用600毫克时,是一种高效且耐受性良好的紧急避孕药。我们评估了较低剂量的米非司酮(50毫克和10毫克)以及更长的性交后治疗期(120小时)是否能达到同样的效果。

方法

我们在澳大利亚、中国、芬兰、格鲁吉亚、英国和美国的11家计划生育诊所进行了一项多中心、单盲、随机试验。1717名月经周期规律、在无保护性交120小时内要求紧急避孕的健康女性被随机分配到三个治疗组。

结果

32名女性失访,1名女性在治疗前已怀孕。600毫克组、50毫克组和10毫克组的妊娠比例无差异(559名中的7名[1.3%]、560名中的6名[1.1%]、565名中的7名[1.2%])。两例妊娠(均在50毫克组)为输卵管妊娠。在没有进一步性交行为的女性中,治疗延迟似乎不影响效果。除下次月经来潮延迟外,未发生重大副作用,且延迟与米非司酮剂量显著相关(p<0.001)。

解读

将米非司酮剂量降低60倍在典型使用情况下作为紧急避孕药的效果并未降低,尽管如此规模的研究不能排除高达近三倍的效果差异。较低剂量的米非司酮与月经周期的干扰较小有关。因此,低至10毫克的剂量似乎比600毫克的剂量更可取。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three single doses of mifepristone as emergency contraception: a randomised trial. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation.三种单剂量米非司酮作为紧急避孕方法的比较:一项随机试验。排卵后生育调节方法特别工作组。
Lancet. 1999 Feb 27;353(9154):697-702.
2
Comparison of three single doses of mifepristone as emergency contraception: a randomised controlled trial.三种单剂量米非司酮作为紧急避孕药的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Dec;45(6):489-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00483.x.
3
Low dose mifepristone and two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a WHO multicentre randomised trial.低剂量米非司酮与两种左炔诺孕酮方案用于紧急避孕:一项世界卫生组织多中心随机试验
Lancet. 2002 Dec 7;360(9348):1803-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11767-3.
4
[Effects of mifepristone of different doses on emergency contraception, a randomized double-blind study].[不同剂量米非司酮用于紧急避孕的效果:一项随机双盲研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 May 25;83(10):813-8.
5
[Low doses of mifepristone for emergency contraception].[低剂量米非司酮用于紧急避孕]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1999 Jun;34(6):335-8.
6
The potential of mifepristone (RU-486) as an emergency contraceptive drug.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Apr;84(4):309-16. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00418.x.
7
Mifepristone (RU 486) compared with high-dose estrogen and progestogen for emergency postcoital contraception.米非司酮(RU 486)与高剂量雌激素和孕激素用于性交后紧急避孕的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 8;327(15):1041-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210083271501.
8
Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis.依托孕烯醇酮醋酸酯与左炔诺孕酮用于紧急避孕的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验及荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2010 Feb 13;375(9714):555-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60101-8. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
9
[A randomized multicentre clinical trial on different doses of mifepristone alone and in combination with anordrin as emergency contraception].不同剂量米非司酮单用及与双炔失碳酯联合作为紧急避孕的随机多中心临床试验
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1999 Jun;34(6):331-4.
10
A randomised study comparing a low dose of mifepristone and the Yuzpe regimen for emergency contraception.一项比较低剂量米非司酮与Yuzpe方案用于紧急避孕的随机研究。
BJOG. 2002 May;109(5):553-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01371.x.

引用本文的文献

1
90 YEARS OF PROGESTERONE: Selective progesterone receptor modulators in gynaecological therapies.90 年的孕激素:妇科治疗中的选择性孕激素受体调节剂。
J Mol Endocrinol. 2020 Jul;65(1):T15-T33. doi: 10.1530/JME-19-0238.
2
Interventions for emergency contraception.紧急避孕的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 20;1(1):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub6.
3
Interventions for emergency contraception.紧急避孕的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 2;8(8):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub5.
4
Worldwide research productivity in emergency contraception: a bibliometric analysis.全球紧急避孕领域的研究生产力:一项文献计量分析。
Fertil Res Pract. 2015 May 5;1:6. doi: 10.1186/2054-7099-1-6. eCollection 2015.
5
Mechanism of Action of Ulipristal Acetate for Emergency Contraception: A Systematic Review.醋酸乌利司他用于紧急避孕的作用机制:一项系统评价。
Front Pharmacol. 2016 Jan 12;6:315. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00315. eCollection 2015.
6
Emergency contraception - potential for women's health.紧急避孕——对女性健康的潜在影响。
Indian J Med Res. 2014 Nov;140 Suppl(Suppl 1):S45-52.
7
Emerging options for emergency contraception.紧急避孕的新选择。
Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2013 Feb 18;7:23-35. doi: 10.4137/CMRH.S8145.
8
The regulation of embryo implantation and endometrial decidualization by progesterone receptor signaling.孕激素受体信号调控胚胎着床和子宫内膜蜕膜化。
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012 Jul 25;358(2):155-65. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.07.027. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
9
The state-of-the-art of emergency contraception with the cutting edge drug.前沿药物在紧急避孕方面的最新进展。
Ger Med Sci. 2011;9:Doc16. doi: 10.3205/000139. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
10
Understanding contraceptive failure.了解避孕失败的原因。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Apr;23(2):199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.11.008. Epub 2009 Feb 14.