Suppr超能文献

启动三联抗逆转录病毒治疗方案后,HIV感染患者的生存率有所提高。

Improved survival among HIV-infected patients after initiation of triple-drug antiretroviral regimens.

作者信息

Hogg R S, Yip B, Kully C, Craib K J, O'Shaughnessy M V, Schechter M T, Montaner J S

出版信息

CMAJ. 1999 Mar 9;160(5):659-65.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of triple-drug antiretroviral regimens in the treatment of patients infected with HIV has been established in several randomized clinical trials. However, the effectiveness of these new regimens in patient populations outside clinical trials remain unproven. This study compared mortality and AIDS-free survival among HIV-infected patients in British Columbia who were treated with double- and triple-drug regimens.

METHODS

The authors used a prospective, population-based cohort design to study a population of HIV-positive men and women 18 years or older for whom antiretroviral therapy was first prescribed between Oct. 1, 1994, and Dec. 31, 1996; all patients were from British Columbia. Rates of progression from the initiation of antiretroviral therapy to death or to diagnosis of primary AIDS were determined for patients who initially received an ERA-II regimen (2 nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs] including lamivudine or stavudine, or both) and for those who initially received an ERA-III regimen (triple-drug regimen consisting of 2 NRTIs and a protease inhibitor [indinavir, ritonavir or saquinavir] or a non-NRTI [nevirapine]).

RESULTS

A total of 500 men and women (312 receiving an ERA-III regimen and 188 an ERA-III regimen) were eligible. Patients in the ERA-III group survived significantly longer than those in the ERA-II group. As of Dec. 31, 1997, 40 patients had died (35 in the ERA-II group and 5 in the ERA-III group), for a crude mortality rate of 8.0%. The cumulative mortality rates at 12 months were 7.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.9% to 8.9%) for patients in the ERA-II group and 1.6% (95% CI 0.7% to 2.5%) for those in the ERA-III group (log rank p = 0.003). The likelihood of death was more than 3 times higher among patients in the ERA-II group (mortality risk ratio 3.82 [95% CI 1.48% to 9.84], p = 0.006). After adjustment for prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia or Mycobacterium avium infection, AIDS diagnosis, CD4+ cell count, sex and age at initiation of therapy, the likelihood of death among patients in the ERA-II group was 3.21 times higher (95% CI 1.24 to 8.30, p = 0.016) than in the ERA-III group. Cumulative rates of progression to AIDS or death at 12 months were 9.6% (95% CI 7.7% to 11.5%) in the ERA-II group and 3.3% (95% CI 1.8% to 4.8%) in the ERA-III group (log rank p = 0.006). After adjustment for prognostic variables (prophylaxis for P. carinii pneumonia or M. avium infection, CD4+ cell count, sex and age at initiation of treatment), the likelihood of progression to AIDS or death at 12 months among patients in the ERA-II group was 2.37 times higher (95% CI 1.04 to 5.38, p = 0.040) than in the ERA-III group.

INTERPRETATION

This population-based cohort study confirms that patients initially treated with a triple-drug antiretroviral regimen comprising 2 NRTIs plus protease inhibitor or a non-NRTI have a lower risk of morbidity and death than patients treated exclusively with 2 NRTIs.

摘要

背景

多项随机临床试验已证实三联抗逆转录病毒疗法在治疗HIV感染患者中的疗效。然而,这些新疗法在临床试验以外的患者群体中的有效性仍未得到证实。本研究比较了不列颠哥伦比亚省接受双药和三药疗法的HIV感染患者的死亡率和无艾滋病生存期。

方法

作者采用前瞻性、基于人群的队列设计,研究1994年10月1日至1996年12月31日首次接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的18岁及以上HIV阳性男性和女性群体;所有患者均来自不列颠哥伦比亚省。确定最初接受ERA-II方案(2种核苷类似物逆转录酶抑制剂[NRTIs],包括拉米夫定或司他夫定,或两者兼有)的患者以及最初接受ERA-III方案(由2种NRTIs和1种蛋白酶抑制剂[茚地那韦、利托那韦或沙奎那韦]或1种非NRTI[奈韦拉平]组成的三联疗法)的患者从开始抗逆转录病毒治疗到死亡或原发性艾滋病诊断的进展率。

结果

共有500名男性和女性符合条件(312人接受ERA-III方案,188人接受ERA-II方案)。ERA-III组患者的生存期明显长于ERA-II组。截至1997年12月31日,40名患者死亡(ERA-II组35人,ERA-III组5人),粗死亡率为8.0%。ERA-II组患者12个月时的累积死亡率为7.4%(95%置信区间[CI]5.9%至8.9%),ERA-III组为1.6%(95%CI 0.7%至2.5%)(对数秩检验p = 0.003)。ERA-II组患者的死亡可能性高出3倍多(死亡风险比3.82[95%CI 1.48%至9.84],p = 0.006)。在对卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎或鸟分枝杆菌感染的预防、艾滋病诊断、CD4+细胞计数、治疗开始时的性别和年龄进行调整后,ERA-II组患者的死亡可能性比ERA-III组高3.21倍(95%CI 1.24至8.30,p = 0.016)。ERA-II组患者12个月时进展为艾滋病或死亡的累积发生率为9.6%(95%CI 7.7%至11.5%),ERA-III组为3.3%(95%CI 1.8%至4.8%)(对数秩检验p = 0.006)。在对预后变量(卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎或鸟分枝杆菌感染的预防、CD4+细胞计数、治疗开始时的性别和年龄)进行调整后,ERA-II组患者12个月时进展为艾滋病或死亡的可能性比ERA-III组高2.37倍(95%CI 1.04至5.38,p = 0.040)。

解读

这项基于人群的队列研究证实,最初接受由2种NRTIs加蛋白酶抑制剂或非NRTI组成的三联抗逆转录病毒疗法治疗的患者比仅接受2种NRTIs治疗的患者发病和死亡风险更低。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验