• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于血铅水平为10至14微克/分升的儿童,无需进行诊断测试。

Diagnostic testing unwarranted for children with blood lead 10 to 14 microg/dL.

作者信息

Sargent J D, Dalton M, Klein R Z

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire 03756, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1999 Apr;103(4):e51. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.4.e51.

DOI:10.1542/peds.103.4.e51
PMID:10103343
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend diagnostic venous blood lead testing within 90 days of a marginally elevated screening test (10-14 microg/dL).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of a marginally elevated capillary (CScr) or venous (VScr) blood lead screening test to predict venous diagnostic (VPb) blood lead (taken within 90 days of the screening test) that would prompt environmental evaluation (>/=20 microg/dL).

DESIGN

Population-based follow-up study comparing CScr and VScr with VPb drawn within 90 days of the screening sample. This study population was drawn from all children aged 0 to 4 years who were screened in Worcester County, Massachusetts, and Providence County, Rhode Island, with CScr and VScr during calendar year 1994.

OUTCOME MEASURES

To evaluate predictive validity, CScr and VScr were correlated with VPb. CScr, VScr, and VPb results were then separated into the following categories: <10, 10 to 14, 15 to 19, and >/=20 microg/dL. CScr and VScr categories were cross-tabulated against VPb categories, and logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate categorical elevations of CScr and VScr as predictors of VPb >/=20 microg/dL.

RESULTS

Of 31 904 children screened with CScr, 5450 (17.1%) were elevated and 1278 were followed up with VPb within 90 days. Of 14 623 children screened with VScr, 2979 (20.4%) were elevated and 614 were followed up with VPb within 90 days. CScr was only weakly correlated with VPb (r = 0.39), whereas VScr was more strongly correlated with VPb (r = 0.73). Compared with CScr <10 microg/dL, CScr in the 10 to 14 microg/dL range did not identify a higher percentage of children with VPb elevation in any category, and falsely misclassified as lead poisoned some 77% of children. Compared with VScr <10 microg/dL, VScr in the 10 to 14 microg/dL range identified higher percentages of children with VPb in the 10 to 19 microg/dL range but not with VPb >/=20 microg/dL, and falsely misclassified as lead poisoned 42% of children. Compared with screening tests <10 microg/dL, the odds of identifying a child with VPb >/=20 were no different from 1 for CScr of 10 to 14 microg/dL (adjusted odds ratio 1.4 [95% confidence interval 0.3, 6.6]), CScr of 15 to 19 microg/dL (3.2 [0.7, 15.7]), or VScr of 10 to 14 microg/dL (0.9 [0.3, 3.0]). CScr and VScr in the 15 to 19 microg/dL range were associated with significantly higher odds of having VPb >/=20 microg/dL when compared with screening tests <10 microg/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that special diagnostic testing within 90 days for children with CScr and VScr in the 10 to 14 microg/dL range does not result in greater identification of VPb >/=20. Raising the set point for diagnostic testing to 15 microg/dL in this sample would eliminate the unnecessary follow-up of 5162 children, of whom 3360 were falsely misclassified as having undue lead exposure.

摘要

背景

美国儿科学会和疾病控制与预防中心近期声明建议,在筛查试验结果略高于正常范围(10 - 14微克/分升)后的90天内进行诊断性静脉血铅检测。

目的

评估毛细血管血铅筛查试验(CScr)或静脉血铅筛查试验(VScr)结果略高于正常范围时,预测90天内静脉诊断性血铅检测(VPb)结果(≥20微克/分升,此结果会促使进行环境评估)的能力。

设计

基于人群的随访研究,比较CScr和VScr与筛查样本90天内采集的VPb。本研究人群来自1994年日历年在马萨诸塞州伍斯特县和罗德岛州普罗维登斯县接受CScr和VScr筛查的所有0至4岁儿童。

观察指标

为评估预测效度,将CScr和VScr与VPb进行相关性分析。然后将CScr、VScr和VPb结果分为以下类别:<10、10至14、15至19和≥20微克/分升。将CScr和VScr类别与VPb类别进行交叉制表,并采用逻辑回归分析评估CScr和VScr的分类升高情况作为VPb≥20微克/分升的预测指标。

结果

在31904名接受CScr筛查的儿童中,5450名(17.1%)结果升高,其中1278名在90天内接受了VPb检测。在14623名接受VScr筛查的儿童中,2979名(20.4%)结果升高,其中614名在90天内接受了VPb检测。CScr与VPb的相关性较弱(r = 0.39),而VScr与VPb的相关性更强(r = 0.73)。与CScr<10微克/分升相比,CScr在10至14微克/分升范围内并未在任何类别中识别出更高比例的VPb升高儿童,且约77%的儿童被错误分类为铅中毒。与VScr<10微克/分升相比,VScr在10至14微克/分升范围内识别出了10至19微克/分升范围内更高比例的VPb升高儿童,但未识别出≥20微克/分升的儿童,且42%的儿童被错误分类为铅中毒。与<10微克/分升的筛查试验相比,CScr为10至14微克/分升(调整后的优势比为1.4[95%置信区间0.3, 6.6])、CScr为15至19微克/分升(3.2[0.7, 15.7])或VScr为10至14微克/分升(0.9[0.3, 3.0])时,识别出VPb≥20微克/分升儿童的几率与1无异。与<10微克/分升的筛查试验相比,CScr和VScr在15至19微克/分升范围内与VPb≥20微克/分升的几率显著更高相关。

结论

这些数据表明,对于CScr和VScr在10至14微克/分升范围内的儿童,90天内进行特殊诊断检测并不能更多地识别出VPb≥20微克/分升的情况。将本样本中的诊断检测设定点提高到15微克/分升可避免对5162名儿童进行不必要的随访,其中3360名被错误分类为铅暴露过度儿童。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic testing unwarranted for children with blood lead 10 to 14 microg/dL.对于血铅水平为10至14微克/分升的儿童,无需进行诊断测试。
Pediatrics. 1999 Apr;103(4):e51. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.4.e51.
2
Follow-up of children suffering from lead poisoning or at risk of lead poisoning in Greater Paris, 1992--2002.1992 - 2002年大巴黎地区铅中毒或有铅中毒风险儿童的随访情况
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2008 Dec;56(6):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
3
Using state lead poisoning surveillance system data to assess false positive results of capillary testing.利用州铅中毒监测系统数据评估毛细血管检测的假阳性结果。
Matern Child Health J. 2007 Nov;11(6):603-10. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0196-1. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
4
Screening housing to prevent lead toxicity in children.筛查住房以预防儿童铅中毒。
Public Health Rep. 2005 May-Jun;120(3):305-10. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000315.
5
Statewide assessment of lead poisoning and exposure risk among children receiving Medicaid services in Alaska.阿拉斯加接受医疗补助服务儿童铅中毒及暴露风险的全州评估。
Pediatrics. 1997 Apr;99(4):E9. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.4.e9.
6
[Occurrence of lead poisoning during follow-up of children at risk with initial screening lead blood levels below 100 microg/L].[初始筛查血铅水平低于100微克/升的高危儿童随访期间铅中毒的发生情况]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2009 Aug;57(4):249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
7
Elevated blood lead levels and reading readiness at the start of kindergarten.幼儿园开学时血铅水平升高与阅读准备就绪。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131(6):1081-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2277. Epub 2013 May 13.
8
Lead poisoning risk determination in an urban population through the use of a standardized questionnaire.通过使用标准化问卷确定城市人口中的铅中毒风险
Pediatrics. 1994 Feb;93(2):159-63.
9
Interpreting and managing blood lead levels < 10 microg/dL in children and reducing childhood exposures to lead: recommendations of CDC's Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention.解读和管理儿童血铅水平<10微克/分升并减少儿童铅暴露:美国疾病控制与预防中心儿童铅中毒预防咨询委员会的建议
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007 Nov 2;56(RR-8):1-16.
10
Surveillance for elevated blood lead levels among children--United States, 1997-2001.美国1997 - 2001年儿童血铅水平升高情况监测
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003 Sep 12;52(10):1-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Using state lead poisoning surveillance system data to assess false positive results of capillary testing.利用州铅中毒监测系统数据评估毛细血管检测的假阳性结果。
Matern Child Health J. 2007 Nov;11(6):603-10. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0196-1. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
2
Association of umbilical cord blood lead with neonatal behavior at varying levels of exposure.不同暴露水平下脐带血铅与新生儿行为的关联
Behav Brain Funct. 2006 Jun 27;2:22. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-2-22.
3
Should the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's childhood lead poisoning intervention level be lowered?
疾病控制与预防中心针对儿童铅中毒的干预水平是否应降低?
Am J Public Health. 2003 Aug;93(8):1253-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1253.