• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特定雇主报告卡与全社区报告卡:有区别吗?

Employer-specific versus community-wide report cards: is there a difference?

作者信息

Knutson D J, Fowles J B, Finch M, McGee J, Dahms N, Kind E A, Adlis S

机构信息

HealthSystem Minnesota, Minneapolis 55416, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):111-25.

PMID:10165026
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4193626/
Abstract

This article describes preliminary results from a natural experiment that tested the impact of report cards on employees. As part of the 1995 enrollment process, some members of the State of Minnesota Employee Group Insurance Program received report cards on the plans offered to them, and others did not. Both groups of employees had a chance to review a second community-wide report card covering all Minnesota plans that had been distributed by an independent organization through local newspapers. Both groups were surveyed before and after they made their health plan selections. We compare the likelihood of seeing, the intensity of reading, and the perceived helpfulness of the first, employer-specific report card with the second, community-wide report card for consumers who make plan selections.

摘要

本文介绍了一项自然实验的初步结果,该实验测试了报告卡对员工的影响。作为1995年参保流程的一部分,明尼苏达州员工团体保险计划的一些成员收到了提供给他们的计划的报告卡,而其他成员则没有。两组员工都有机会查看由一个独立组织通过当地报纸分发的涵盖所有明尼苏达计划的第二份全社区报告卡。两组员工在做出健康计划选择之前和之后都接受了调查。我们比较了做出计划选择的消费者对第一份特定雇主报告卡和第二份全社区报告卡的查看可能性、阅读强度以及感知到的有用性。

相似文献

1
Employer-specific versus community-wide report cards: is there a difference?特定雇主报告卡与全社区报告卡:有区别吗?
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):111-25.
2
Impact of report cards on employees: a natural experiment.员工绩效报告卡的影响:一项自然实验。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1998 Fall;20(1):5-27.
3
Consumer perspectives on information needs for health plan choice.消费者对健康计划选择信息需求的看法。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):55-73.
4
What does it all mean? Making sense of health plan data.这一切意味着什么?理解健康计划数据。
Mod Healthc. 1998 Apr 20;28(16):98-106.
5
Consumer responses to health plan report cards in two markets.两个市场中消费者对健康保险计划评级报告的反应。
Med Care. 2000 May;38(5):469-81. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200005000-00004.
6
Do employees use report cards to assess health care provider systems?员工是否使用报告卡来评估医疗服务提供系统?
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jul;36(3):509-30.
7
The impact of health plan report cards on managed care enrollment.健康计划成绩单对管理式医疗参保率的影响。
J Health Econ. 2002 Jan;21(1):19-41. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00111-4.
8
Does consumer satisfaction information matter? Evidence on member retention in FEHBP plans.消费者满意度信息重要吗?联邦雇员健康福利计划(FEHBP)中会员留存率的相关证据。
Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Jun;61(2):171-86. doi: 10.1177/1077558704263797.
9
Making the grade. Report cards will be used to measure the performance of health plans: how might they work?评定等级。将使用成绩单来衡量健康计划的绩效:它们可能如何运作?
Hosp Health Netw. 1994 Jan 5;68(1):34-6.
10
The effect of report cards on consumer choice in the health insurance market.成绩单对健康保险市场中消费者选择的影响。
J Health Econ. 2002 Nov;21(6):1031-48. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00075-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician.患者在选择初级保健医生时对技术质量与人际质量的偏好。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):957-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00395.x.
2
Do employees use report cards to assess health care provider systems?员工是否使用报告卡来评估医疗服务提供系统?
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jul;36(3):509-30.
3
Creating more effective health plan quality reports for consumers: lessons from a synthesis of qualitative testing.为消费者创建更有效的健康计划质量报告:定性测试综合分析的经验教训
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jul;36(3):447-76.
4
Impact of report cards on employees: a natural experiment.员工绩效报告卡的影响:一项自然实验。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1998 Fall;20(1):5-27.
5
No exit? The effect of health status on dissatisfaction and disenrollment from health plans.无路可退?健康状况对健康保险计划不满及退出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun;34(2):547-76.

本文引用的文献

1
Taxation, health insurance, and market failure in the medical economy.医疗经济中的税收、医疗保险与市场失灵。
J Econ Lit. 1986;24(2):629-75.
2
What type of quality information do consumers want in a health care report card?消费者在医疗保健成绩单中想要哪种类型的质量信息?
Med Care Res Rev. 1996 Mar;53(1):28-47. doi: 10.1177/107755879605300102.
3
Health care report cards: what about consumers' perspectives?医疗保健报告卡:消费者怎么看?
J Ambul Care Manage. 1994 Oct;17(4):1-14. doi: 10.1097/00004479-199410000-00003.
4
HMOs and employers unite to collect outcomes data.
Bus Health. 1992 Jun;10(7):44-50.
5
Informing and protecting consumers under managed competition.在管理式竞争下为消费者提供信息并保护消费者。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12 Suppl:76-86. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.76.
6
The history and principles of managed competition.管理式竞争的历史与原则。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12 Suppl:24-48. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.24.
7
When medical group and HMO part company: disenrollment decisions in Medicare HMOs.当医疗集团与健康维护组织分道扬镳时:医疗保险健康维护组织中的退保决策
Med Care. 1993 Sep;31(9):808-21. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199309000-00006.
8
Premium elasticities of health plan choice.
Inquiry. 1994;31(4):438-44.
9
Reporting and using health plan performance information in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州健康计划绩效信息的报告与使用。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Apr;21(4):167-77. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30137-7.
10
Performance reports on quality--prototypes, problems, and prospects.质量绩效报告——原型、问题与前景
N Engl J Med. 1995 Jul 6;333(1):57-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199507063330114.