• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残疾问卷:它们评估什么?

Handicap questionnaires: what do they assess?

作者信息

Cardol M, Brandsma J W, de Groot I J, van den Bos G A, de Haan R J, de Jong B A

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 1999 Mar;21(3):97-105. doi: 10.1080/096382899297819.

DOI:10.1080/096382899297819
PMID:10206348
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is an increasing need to get insight into the social and societal impact of chronic conditions on a person's life, i.e. person-perceived handicap. The purpose of this study is to report how current handicap questionnaires assess handicap.

METHOD

A literature search using both Medline and the database of the Dutch Institute of Allied Health Professions (NPi) was conducted for handicap questionnaires. Questionnaires were included if addressing handicaps or life roles, environmental influences and social consequences of a disease. Excluded were questionnaires focusing on only impairments, disabilities or quality of life.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

20 questionnaires were identified. Handicap is not uniformly defined in these questionnaires. Based on different concepts, the various questionnaires encompass different domains and different aspects are emphasized in similar domains. Fourteen questionnaires assess society-perceived handicaps, and do not address the life roles, care needs or individual problem-experience. Six questionnaires are to some extent person-perceived, but a generic person-perceived handicap questionnaire could not be identified. It is concluded that development of a generic person-perceived handicap questionnaire is essential for adequate assessment of needs, outcome, and relevance of rehabilitation interventions from the individual's point of view.

摘要

背景与目的

深入了解慢性病对个人生活的社会及社会影响,即个人所感知的残疾状况的需求日益增加。本研究旨在报告当前残疾问卷如何评估残疾情况。

方法

利用医学文献数据库(Medline)和荷兰联合健康职业研究所(NPi)的数据库对残疾问卷进行文献检索。若问卷涉及疾病的残疾或生活角色、环境影响及社会后果,则纳入研究。仅关注损伤、残疾或生活质量的问卷被排除。

结果与结论

共识别出20份问卷。这些问卷对残疾的定义并不统一。基于不同概念,各类问卷涵盖不同领域,且相似领域中强调的不同方面也有所不同。14份问卷评估的是社会所感知的残疾情况,未涉及生活角色、护理需求或个人问题体验。6份问卷在一定程度上是个人所感知的,但未找到通用的个人所感知残疾问卷。结论是,开发通用的个人所感知残疾问卷对于从个体角度充分评估康复干预的需求、结果及相关性至关重要。

相似文献

1
Handicap questionnaires: what do they assess?残疾问卷:它们评估什么?
Disabil Rehabil. 1999 Mar;21(3):97-105. doi: 10.1080/096382899297819.
2
Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap.
Int J Rehabil Res. 1998 Jun;21(2):127-41. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199806000-00002.
3
Psychometric validation of an Assessment Questionnaire on the Perception of and Adaptation to Visual Handicap in Adults (QUEPAHVA).成人视觉障碍感知与适应评估问卷(QUEPAHVA)的心理测量学验证
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020 Dec;43(10):e341-e350. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
4
Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke.
Disabil Rehabil. 2001 Sep 10;23(13):559-69. doi: 10.1080/09638280010022540.
5
Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations.脊髓损伤对社会参与的长期影响:残疾状况的发生
Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Mar 10;22(4):170-80. doi: 10.1080/096382800296863.
6
Disability, resources, role demands and mobility handicap.残疾、资源、角色需求与行动障碍
Disabil Rehabil. 1995 Apr-Jun;17(3-4):159-68. doi: 10.3109/09638289509166711.
7
The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA).障碍评估问卷的开发:对参与和自主的影响(IPA)。
Clin Rehabil. 1999 Oct;13(5):411-9. doi: 10.1191/026921599668601325.
8
[Development of rheumatoid arthritis functional handicap assessment questionnaire: preliminary study].类风湿关节炎功能障碍评估问卷的编制:初步研究
Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2003 Jun;46(5):241-8. doi: 10.1016/s0168-6054(03)00085-0.
9
[Handicap and quality of life assessment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis].[肌萎缩侧索硬化症的残疾与生活质量评估]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2006 Jun;162 Spec No 2:4S200-4S204.
10
Measuring the impact and distress of health problems from the individual's perspective: development of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile (PIPP).从个体角度衡量健康问题的影响和困扰:问题概况感知影响量表(PIPP)的编制
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Jun 29;4:36. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire (IPA): Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version for Stroke Survivors.对参与和自主性的影响问卷(IPA):中文版对中风幸存者的信度和效度
Int J Gen Med. 2025 Mar 26;18:1721-1729. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S506798. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of the biopsychosocial model of disability on the medicolegal assessment of personal injury.残疾的生物心理社会模型对人身伤害法医学评估的影响。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;82(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01471-6.
3
Participation and autonomy, independence in activities of daily living and upper extremity functioning in individuals with spinal cord injury.
脊髓损伤患者的参与和自主、日常生活活动的独立性和上肢功能。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 20;14(1):9120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59862-2.
4
Factors Affecting the Quality of Sleep and Social Participation of Stroke Patients.影响中风患者睡眠质量和社会参与度的因素。
Brain Sci. 2023 Jul 13;13(7):1068. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13071068.
5
Are the Domains Considered by ICF Comprehensive Enough to Conceptualize Participation in the Patient with Hand Injuries?国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)所考虑的领域对于概念化手部损伤患者的参与度来说足够全面吗?
J Hand Microsurg. 2017 Dec;9(3):139-153. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608693. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
6
Rasch analysis of the London Handicap Scale in stroke patients: a cross-sectional study.中风患者伦敦残障量表的拉施分析:一项横断面研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jul 31;11:114. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-114.
7
Measuring community integration after spinal cord injury: validation of the Sydney psychosocial reintegration scale and community integration measure.脊髓损伤后社区融入的测量:悉尼心理社会再融入量表和社区融入度量表的验证。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Oct;19(8):1185-93. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9685-6. Epub 2010 Jun 27.
8
Health and role functioning: the use of focus groups in the development of an item bank.健康和角色功能:在项目库开发中使用焦点小组。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Feb;19(1):111-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9570-3. Epub 2010 Jan 3.
9
Developing the communicative participation item bank: Rasch analysis results from a spasmodic dysphonia sample.开发沟通参与项目库:痉挛性发声障碍样本的拉施分析结果
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Oct;52(5):1302-20. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0275). Epub 2009 Aug 28.
10
Development and psychometric properties of the Carer - Head Injury Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale (C-HINAS) and the Carer - Head Injury Participation Scale (C-HIPS): patient and family determined outcome scales.照顾者颅脑损伤神经行为评估量表(C-HINAS)和照顾者颅脑损伤参与量表(C-HIPS)的制定及心理测量学特性:患者和家属确定的结局量表。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2007 Jun;3(3):389-408.