Watts D D, Roche M, Tricarico R, Poole F, Brown J J, Colson G B, Trask A L, Fakhry S M
Department of Trauma Services, Inova Regional Trauma Center, Falls Church, Virginia 22042, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999 Apr-Jun;3(2):115-22. doi: 10.1080/10903129908958918.
Hypothermia can have a negative effect on the metabolic and hemostatic functions of patients with traumatic injuries. Multiple methods of rewarming are currently used in the prehospital arena, but little objective evidence for their effectiveness in this setting exists. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative effectiveness of traditional prehospital measures in maintaining thermostasis in trauma patients.
Participating helicopter and ground ambulance ALS units were prospectively randomized to provide either routine care only (passive or no warming) or routine care (passive warming) in conjunction with active warming (either reflective blankets, hot pack rewarming, or warmed IV fluids). A total of 174 trauma code patients, aged >14 years, who met inclusion criteria were prospectively enrolled by prehospital providers. Patients who received a non-assigned intervention or who had incomplete temperature data were dropped from the analysis. A total of 134 patients were included in the final analysis.
Patients who received hot pack rewarming showed a mean increase in body temperature during transport (+1.36 degrees F/0.74 degrees C), while all other groups (no intervention, passive rewarming, reflective blankets, warmed IV fluids, warmed IV fluid plus reflective blanket) showed a mean decrease in temperature during transport [-0.34 to -0.61 degrees F (-0.2 to -0.4 degrees C); p<0.01]. In addition, the hot pack group was consistent, with every patient who received hot pack warming showing an increase in body temperature during transport, while in all other groups there were patients who had both increases and decreases in temperature. The intervention groups did not differ significantly on exposure to precipitation, transport unit temperature, total prehospital time, initial vital signs, amount of fluid administered, Injury Severity Score, or Glasgow Coma Score.
Most traditional methods of maintaining trauma patient temperature during prehospital transport appear to be inadequate. Aggressive use of hot packs, a simple, inexpensive intervention to maintain thermostasis, deserves further study as a potential basic intervention for trauma patients.
体温过低会对创伤患者的代谢和止血功能产生负面影响。目前在院前急救中使用多种复温方法,但在这种情况下其有效性的客观证据很少。本研究的目的是评估传统院前措施在维持创伤患者体温恒定方面的相对有效性。
参与研究的直升机和地面救护车高级生命支持(ALS)单位被前瞻性随机分组,分别提供仅常规护理(被动或不升温)或常规护理(被动升温)并结合主动升温(反光毯、热敷袋复温或温热静脉输液)。共有174名年龄大于14岁且符合纳入标准的创伤急救患者被院前急救人员前瞻性纳入研究。接受未分配干预或体温数据不完整的患者被排除在分析之外。最终分析纳入了134名患者。
接受热敷袋复温的患者在转运过程中体温平均升高(+1.36华氏度/0.74摄氏度),而所有其他组(无干预、被动复温、反光毯、温热静脉输液、温热静脉输液加反光毯)在转运过程中体温平均下降[-0.34至-0.61华氏度(-0.2至-0.4摄氏度);p<0.01]。此外,热敷袋组情况一致,每个接受热敷袋复温的患者在转运过程中体温都升高,而在所有其他组中都有体温升高和降低的患者。各干预组在暴露于降水、转运单位温度、院前总时间、初始生命体征、输液量、损伤严重程度评分或格拉斯哥昏迷评分方面无显著差异。
大多数传统的院前转运过程中维持创伤患者体温的方法似乎并不充分。积极使用热敷袋作为一种简单、廉价的维持体温恒定的干预措施,作为创伤患者潜在的基本干预措施值得进一步研究。