Goldberger Samuel M, Tursky Bernard
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, and Laboratory for Behavioral Research, Department of Political Science, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook N.Y. 11794 U.S.A.
Pain. 1976 Dec;2(4):417-429. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(76)90082-8.
An experimental investigation of acupuncture's analgesic potency, separated from suggestion effects, is described, in which judgments of shock-elicited pain of the forearm were recorded along two separate scales: intensity and aversiveness. Data from experimental subjects, who received electrical acupunctural stimulation through surface electrodes located over acupuncture points and were given explicit counter-suggestions of sensitization, were compared to those obtained from control subjects, who received such stimulation over incorrect loci and were given explicit suggestions of analgesia. No alterations in the perception of pain intensity, either by acupunctural stimulation or suggestion, could be detected at any time during the experiment, but stimulation of the correct points produced a significant analgesic reduction in aversiveness which was specific to the arm so stimulated, overcame the counter-suggestion of sensitization, and persisted after stimulation was discontinued. No significant reductions were recorded from control subjects. These findings are interpreted in light of other experimental acupuncture research, and of the demonstrated mode of action of analgesics of proven efficacy.
本文描述了一项对针刺镇痛效力(与暗示效应相分离)的实验研究,其中沿着两个独立的量表记录了前臂电击诱发疼痛的判断:强度和厌恶感。将通过位于穴位上方的表面电极接受电针刺激并得到明确的致敏反暗示的实验对象的数据,与通过在错误部位接受此类刺激并得到明确镇痛暗示的对照对象的数据进行了比较。在实验过程中的任何时候,均未检测到针刺刺激或暗示对疼痛强度感知的改变,但刺激正确穴位可使厌恶感显著减轻,这种减轻对所刺激手臂具有特异性,克服了致敏反暗示,且在刺激停止后仍持续存在。对照对象未记录到显著减轻。根据其他针刺实验研究以及已证实有效的镇痛药的作用模式对这些发现进行了解释。