• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险敏感型觅食:蜜蜂对奖励量变化的选择行为。

Risk-sensitive foraging: choice behaviour of honeybees in response to variability in volume of reward.

作者信息

Shafir S, Wiegmann DD, Smith BH, Real LA

机构信息

Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University

出版信息

Anim Behav. 1999 May;57(5):1055-1061. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1078.

DOI:10.1006/anbe.1998.1078
PMID:10328791
Abstract

We tested risk sensitivity towards variability in volume of reward with harnessed honeybees, Apis mellifera, in a proboscis-extension conditioning paradigm. We conditioned each subject to turn its head and extend its proboscis towards one of two presented odours; one odour was associated with a constant reward volume and the other with a variable reward volume that was either low or high, with probabilities P=0.75 and (1-P)=0.25, respectively. The volumes of rewards were varied among three experimental conditions. In conditions I and II, the variable reward option included a low reward of zero (i.e. reinforcement was withheld in the low reward value); in condition I, the mean of the variable and of the constant reward options were the same, and in condition II, the variable reward option had a higher mean reward than the constant reward option. The behaviour of subjects did not differ between treatments and the majority of individuals were risk averse. In condition III, the variable reward option did not include a zero reward and the mean reward did not differ between options. Very few of the individuals assigned to condition III developed a preference for either reward option. Thus, honeybees are risk sensitive to variability in volume of reward in some conditions and the degree of risk sensitivity depends on characteristics of the reward distributions. The most salient characteristic may be a relative measure of variability, such as the value of the coefficient of variation of reward. The experimental paradigm that we developed is a powerful tool for studying the mechanism of risk sensitivity in bees, as well as other aspects of learning, decision making, perception and memory. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

摘要

我们利用家蜂(Apis mellifera),在伸吻反射条件范式下测试了对奖励量变异性的风险敏感性。我们训练每个实验对象将头转向并向呈现的两种气味之一伸出吻部;一种气味与恒定的奖励量相关,另一种与可变的奖励量相关,可变奖励量有低或高两种情况,概率分别为P = 0.75和(1 - P)= 0.25。奖励量在三种实验条件下有所不同。在条件I和条件II中,可变奖励选项包括零奖励(即低奖励值时不给予强化);在条件I中,可变奖励选项和恒定奖励选项的平均值相同,在条件II中,可变奖励选项的平均奖励高于恒定奖励选项。各处理组之间实验对象的行为没有差异,大多数个体表现出风险厌恶。在条件III中,可变奖励选项不包括零奖励,且各选项的平均奖励没有差异。分配到条件III的个体中很少有对任何一种奖励选项产生偏好的。因此,蜜蜂在某些条件下对奖励量的变异性具有风险敏感性,且风险敏感程度取决于奖励分布的特征。最显著的特征可能是变异性的相对度量,例如奖励变异系数的值。我们开发的实验范式是研究蜜蜂风险敏感性机制以及学习、决策、感知和记忆等其他方面的有力工具。版权所有1999年动物行为研究协会。

相似文献

1
Risk-sensitive foraging: choice behaviour of honeybees in response to variability in volume of reward.风险敏感型觅食:蜜蜂对奖励量变化的选择行为。
Anim Behav. 1999 May;57(5):1055-1061. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1078.
2
Parameters of variable reward distributions that affect risk sensitivity of honey bees.影响蜜蜂风险敏感性的可变奖励分布参数。
J Exp Biol. 2007 Jan;210(Pt 2):269-77. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02656.
3
Risk-indifferent foraging behaviour in honeybees.
Anim Behav. 2000 Nov;60(5):657-666. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1492.
4
Quantitative analysis of risk sensitivity in honeybees (Apis mellifera) with variability in concentration and amount of reward.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Apr;26(2):196-205. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.26.2.196.
5
Comparative evaluations of reward dimensions in honey bees: evidence from two-alternative forced choice proboscis-extension conditioning.蜜蜂奖励维度的比较评估:来自双选强迫选择伸吻反射条件作用的证据。
Anim Cogn. 2014 May;17(3):633-44. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0694-z.
6
Context-dependent, risk-sensitive foraging preferences in wild rufous hummingbirds.野生棕煌蜂鸟中依赖情境的、对风险敏感的觅食偏好。
Anim Behav. 1999 Jul;58(1):59-66. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1130.
7
Effects of field-realistic doses of glyphosate on honeybee appetitive behaviour.田间实际剂量草甘膦对蜜蜂食欲行为的影响。
J Exp Biol. 2014 Oct 1;217(Pt 19):3457-64. doi: 10.1242/jeb.109520. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
8
Olfactory information transfer in the honeybee: compared efficiency of classical conditioning and early exposure.蜜蜂中的嗅觉信息传递:经典条件作用与早期接触的效率比较
Anim Behav. 2000 May;59(5):1025-1034. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1395.
9
Odour aversion after olfactory conditioning of the sting extension reflex in honeybees.蜜蜂蛰刺伸展反射嗅觉条件化后的气味厌恶
J Exp Biol. 2009 Mar;212(Pt 5):620-6. doi: 10.1242/jeb.026641.
10
Walking patterns induced by learned odors in the honeybee, Apis mellifera L.蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)中由习得气味诱导的行走模式
J Exp Biol. 2016 Jan;219(Pt 1):12-6. doi: 10.1242/jeb.123356. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A minimal model of learning: quantifying the cost and benefit of learning in changing environments.一个最小模型的学习:量化在不断变化的环境中学习的成本和收益。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Aug 30;290(2005):20231084. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1084.
2
Certainty and uncertainty of the future changes planning and sunk costs.未来变化的确定性和不确定性会影响规划和沉没成本。
Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug;135(4):469-486. doi: 10.1037/bne0000460. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
3
Irrational risk aversion in an ant.蚂蚁的非理性风险规避
Anim Cogn. 2021 Nov;24(6):1237-1245. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01516-1. Epub 2021 May 3.
4
Nesting ecology does not explain slow-fast cognitive differences among honeybee species.巢居生态学不能解释蜜蜂物种之间的慢-快认知差异。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Nov;24(6):1227-1235. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01515-2. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
5
Natural Variation in Flower Color and Scent in Populations of Eruca sativa (Brassicaceae) Affects Pollination Behavior of Honey Bees.芸薹属(十字花科)种群中花的颜色和气味的自然变异影响蜜蜂的传粉行为。
J Insect Sci. 2019 May 1;19(3). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iez038.
6
Foraging strategies and physiological adaptations in large carpenter bees.大型木工蜂的觅食策略和生理适应。
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2019 Jun;205(3):387-398. doi: 10.1007/s00359-019-01323-7. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
7
Uncertainty processing in bees exposed to free choices: Lessons from vertebrates.暴露于自由选择环境中的蜜蜂的不确定性处理:来自脊椎动物的经验教训。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2024-2036. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1441-x.
8
A social insect perspective on the evolution of social learning mechanisms.从群居昆虫角度看社会学习机制的进化
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7838-7845. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620744114. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
9
Learning about natural variation of odor mixtures enhances categorization in early olfactory processing.了解气味混合物的自然变化可增强早期嗅觉处理中的分类能力。
J Exp Biol. 2016 Sep 1;219(Pt 17):2752-62. doi: 10.1242/jeb.141465. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
10
Individual honey bee (Apis cerana) foragers adjust their fuel load to match variability in forage reward.单个中华蜜蜂觅食者会调整其携带的能量负载,以匹配觅食回报的变化。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 9;5:16418. doi: 10.1038/srep16418.