Shafir S, Wiegmann DD, Smith BH, Real LA
Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University
Anim Behav. 1999 May;57(5):1055-1061. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1078.
We tested risk sensitivity towards variability in volume of reward with harnessed honeybees, Apis mellifera, in a proboscis-extension conditioning paradigm. We conditioned each subject to turn its head and extend its proboscis towards one of two presented odours; one odour was associated with a constant reward volume and the other with a variable reward volume that was either low or high, with probabilities P=0.75 and (1-P)=0.25, respectively. The volumes of rewards were varied among three experimental conditions. In conditions I and II, the variable reward option included a low reward of zero (i.e. reinforcement was withheld in the low reward value); in condition I, the mean of the variable and of the constant reward options were the same, and in condition II, the variable reward option had a higher mean reward than the constant reward option. The behaviour of subjects did not differ between treatments and the majority of individuals were risk averse. In condition III, the variable reward option did not include a zero reward and the mean reward did not differ between options. Very few of the individuals assigned to condition III developed a preference for either reward option. Thus, honeybees are risk sensitive to variability in volume of reward in some conditions and the degree of risk sensitivity depends on characteristics of the reward distributions. The most salient characteristic may be a relative measure of variability, such as the value of the coefficient of variation of reward. The experimental paradigm that we developed is a powerful tool for studying the mechanism of risk sensitivity in bees, as well as other aspects of learning, decision making, perception and memory. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
我们利用家蜂(Apis mellifera),在伸吻反射条件范式下测试了对奖励量变异性的风险敏感性。我们训练每个实验对象将头转向并向呈现的两种气味之一伸出吻部;一种气味与恒定的奖励量相关,另一种与可变的奖励量相关,可变奖励量有低或高两种情况,概率分别为P = 0.75和(1 - P)= 0.25。奖励量在三种实验条件下有所不同。在条件I和条件II中,可变奖励选项包括零奖励(即低奖励值时不给予强化);在条件I中,可变奖励选项和恒定奖励选项的平均值相同,在条件II中,可变奖励选项的平均奖励高于恒定奖励选项。各处理组之间实验对象的行为没有差异,大多数个体表现出风险厌恶。在条件III中,可变奖励选项不包括零奖励,且各选项的平均奖励没有差异。分配到条件III的个体中很少有对任何一种奖励选项产生偏好的。因此,蜜蜂在某些条件下对奖励量的变异性具有风险敏感性,且风险敏感程度取决于奖励分布的特征。最显著的特征可能是变异性的相对度量,例如奖励变异系数的值。我们开发的实验范式是研究蜜蜂风险敏感性机制以及学习、决策、感知和记忆等其他方面的有力工具。版权所有1999年动物行为研究协会。