• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Risk-indifferent foraging behaviour in honeybees.

作者信息

Fülöp A, Menzel R

机构信息

Neurobiologie, Freie Universität Berlin

出版信息

Anim Behav. 2000 Nov;60(5):657-666. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1492.

DOI:10.1006/anbe.2000.1492
PMID:11082236
Abstract

We studied the influence of variance in reward volume on choice behaviour of honeybees, Apis mellifera carnica, by training bees to collect sucrose solution from four newly developed artificial feeders. The feeders were electromechanical devices, each controlled by a microprocessor, which monitored the experiments, controlled reward delivery and stored the data. The parameters that varied between the feeders were the amount and variance of reward. The four feeders were arranged in two pairs, with the two feeders in each pair set to the same reward parameters. Constant feeders offered a fixed amount of sucrose solution at each bee visit; variable feeders offered a normally distributed reward with a standard deviation equal to the mean. We tested three reward combinations under two variance conditions. The bees matched their choice frequencies to the mean amount of reward. This applied both to the constant and the variable feeders. Thus the bees were able to discriminate feeders by the amount of reward and were able to estimate the mean reward for the variable flowers. The proportion of immediate returns to the same feeder increased with the amount of sucrose solution imbibed at each visit, indicating that bees were able to perceive the amount of reward at each visit. However, there was no influence of variance on the choice behaviour of the bees, ruling out the possibility that bees are risk sensitive under these conditions. We discuss risk indifference in choice behaviour of bees in the context of several models of risk sensitivity. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

摘要

相似文献

1
Risk-indifferent foraging behaviour in honeybees.
Anim Behav. 2000 Nov;60(5):657-666. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1492.
2
Quantitative analysis of risk sensitivity in honeybees (Apis mellifera) with variability in concentration and amount of reward.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Apr;26(2):196-205. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.26.2.196.
3
Flower constancy in honey bee workers (Apis mellifera) depends on ecologically realistic rewards.蜜蜂工蜂的花的持久性取决于生态现实的奖励。
J Exp Biol. 2011 Apr 15;214(Pt 8):1397-402. doi: 10.1242/jeb.050583.
4
Risk-sensitive foraging: choice behaviour of honeybees in response to variability in volume of reward.风险敏感型觅食:蜜蜂对奖励量变化的选择行为。
Anim Behav. 1999 May;57(5):1055-1061. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1078.
5
Octopamine increases individual and collective foraging in a neotropical stingless bee.章鱼胺增加了新热带无刺蜂的个体和集体觅食。
Biol Lett. 2020 Jun;16(6):20200238. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0238. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
6
Do foraging bumblebees scent-mark food sources and does it matter?觅食的大黄蜂会对食物来源进行气味标记吗?这重要吗?
Oecologia. 1990 Jan;82(1):137-144. doi: 10.1007/BF00318545.
7
The identity of the previous visitor influences flower rejection by nectar-collecting bees.先前访客的身份会影响采蜜蜜蜂对花朵的排斥。
Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):673-681. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0794.
8
Assessment of food source profitability in honeybees (Apis mellifera): how does disturbance of foraging activity affect trophallactic behaviour?蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)食物源盈利能力评估:觅食活动的干扰如何影响交哺行为?
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2003 Jan;189(1):39-45. doi: 10.1007/s00359-002-0373-z. Epub 2002 Dec 5.
9
Foraging scent marks of bumblebees: footprint cues rather than pheromone signals.大黄蜂的觅食气味标记:足迹线索而非信息素信号。
Naturwissenschaften. 2008 Feb;95(2):149-53. doi: 10.1007/s00114-007-0298-z. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
10
Phantom alternatives influence food preferences in the eastern honeybee Apis cerana.替代物影响东方蜜蜂(Apis cerana)的食物偏好。
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Mar;84(2):509-17. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12288. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
More than mesolectic: Characterizing the nutritional niche of .不仅仅是中度嗜食性:表征……的营养生态位
Ecol Evol. 2023 Oct 20;13(10):e10640. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10640. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Aversive view memories and risk perception in navigating ants.导航蚂蚁的厌恶视图记忆和风险感知。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 21;12(1):2899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06859-4.
3
Irrational risk aversion in an ant.蚂蚁的非理性风险规避
Anim Cogn. 2021 Nov;24(6):1237-1245. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01516-1. Epub 2021 May 3.
4
Uncertainty processing in bees exposed to free choices: Lessons from vertebrates.暴露于自由选择环境中的蜜蜂的不确定性处理:来自脊椎动物的经验教训。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2024-2036. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1441-x.
5
FLOBOTS: ROBOTIC FLOWERS FOR BEE BEHAVIOUR EXPERIMENTS.FLOBOTS:用于蜜蜂行为实验的机器人花朵。
J Pollinat Ecol. 2015;15(1):1-5.
6
Relative gains, losses, and reference points in probabilistic choice in rats.大鼠概率选择中的相对收益、损失和参考点
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0117697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117697. eCollection 2015.
7
Serial position learning in honeybees.蜜蜂的系列位置学习
PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004694. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
8
Learning reward expectations in honeybees.蜜蜂学习奖励预期。
Learn Mem. 2007 Jul 12;14(7):491-6. doi: 10.1101/lm.618907. Print 2007 Jul.
9
Assessment of food source profitability in honeybees (Apis mellifera): how does disturbance of foraging activity affect trophallactic behaviour?蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)食物源盈利能力评估:觅食活动的干扰如何影响交哺行为?
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2003 Jan;189(1):39-45. doi: 10.1007/s00359-002-0373-z. Epub 2002 Dec 5.