Looareesuwan S, Wilairatana P, Chalermarut K, Rattanapong Y, Canfield C J, Hutchinson D B
Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Apr;60(4):526-32. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.526.
The increasing frequency of therapeutic failures in falciparum malaria underscores the need for novel, rapidly effective antimalarial drugs or drug combinations. Atovaquone and proguanil are blood schizonticides that demonstrate synergistic activity against multi-drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. In an open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted in Thailand, adult patients with acute P. falciparum malaria were randomly assigned to treatment with atovaquone and proguanil/hydrochloride (1,000 mg and 400 mg, respectively, administered orally at 24-hr intervals for three doses) or mefloquine (750 mg administered orally, followed 6 hr later by an additional 500-mg dose). Efficacy was assessed by cure rate (the percentage of patients in whom parasitemia was eliminated and did not recur during 28 days of follow-up), parasite clearance time (PCT), and fever clearance time (FCT). Safety was assessed by sequential clinical and laboratory assessments for 28 days. Atovaquone/proguanil was significantly more effective than mefloquine (cure rate 100% [79 of 79] vs. 86% [68 of 79]; P < 0.002). The atovaquone/proguanil and mefloquine treatments did not differ with respect to PCT (mean = 65 hr versus 74 hr) or FCT (mean = 59 hr versus 51 hr). Adverse events were generally typical of malaria symptoms and each occurred in < 10% of the patients in either group, with the exception of increased vomiting found in the atovaquone/proguanil group. Transient elevations of liver enzyme levels occurred more frequently in patients treated with atovaquone/proguanil than with mefloquine, but the differences were not significant and values returned to normal by day 28 in most patients. The combination of atovaquone and proguanil was well tolerated and more effective than mefloquine in the treatment of acute uncomplicated multidrug-resistant falciparum malaria in Thailand.
恶性疟治疗失败频率的不断增加凸显了对新型、快速有效的抗疟药物或药物组合的需求。阿托伐醌和氯胍是血液裂殖体杀灭剂,在体外对多重耐药恶性疟原虫具有协同活性。在泰国进行的一项开放标签、随机、对照临床试验中,成年急性恶性疟患者被随机分配接受阿托伐醌和氯胍/盐酸盐治疗(分别为1000毫克和400毫克,每24小时口服一次,共三剂)或甲氟喹治疗(口服750毫克,6小时后再口服500毫克)。通过治愈率(随访28天内疟原虫血症消除且未复发的患者百分比)、寄生虫清除时间(PCT)和发热清除时间(FCT)评估疗效。通过连续28天的临床和实验室评估评估安全性。阿托伐醌/氯胍比甲氟喹显著更有效(治愈率分别为100%[79例中的79例]和86%[79例中的68例];P<0.002)。阿托伐醌/氯胍和甲氟喹治疗在PCT(平均分别为65小时和74小时)或FCT(平均分别为59小时和51小时)方面无差异。不良事件通常为典型的疟疾症状,两组中每种症状的发生率均<10%,阿托伐醌/氯胍组除外,该组呕吐增加。阿托伐醌/氯胍治疗的患者肝酶水平短暂升高比甲氟喹治疗的患者更频繁,但差异不显著,大多数患者在第28天时值恢复正常。在泰国治疗急性非复杂性多重耐药恶性疟时,阿托伐醌和氯胍的组合耐受性良好且比甲氟喹更有效。