Riopel M A, Ronnett B M, Kurman R J
Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Am J Surg Pathol. 1999 Jun;23(6):617-35. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199906000-00001.
Histologic criteria for the distinction of ovarian mucinous borderline tumors (MBTs) from invasive mucinous carcinomas (MUCCAs) and the definitions of intraepithelial (noninvasive) carcinoma and microinvasion are controversial. Accurate assessment of the behavior of these tumors has been obscured by inclusion of cases of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), an entity of extraovarian origin, and misclassification of the ovarian tumors in PMP and metastatic mucinous carcinomas (METCAs) as either advanced-stage MBTs or primary ovarian MUCCAs. One hundred thirty-six intestinal-type ovarian mucinous tumors without PMP were evaluated for the presence of stromal invasion, marked cytologic atypia, epithelial stratification of more than three cell layers, and necrosis. Criteria for the diagnosis of MBT, MBT with intraepithelial carcinoma, MBT with microinvasion (MIBT), MUCCA, and METCA were established and correlated with behavior. Twenty-three (59%) of 39 patients whose tumors had stromal invasion of more than 5 mm died of disease. Stromal invasion of more than 5 mm was the sole feature that correlated with a poor prognosis. In the absence of this feature, marked cytologic atypia, epithelial stratification of more than three layers, microinvasion (<5 mm), or necrosis did not have an adverse effect on survival. Tumors were classified as MBT (n = 65; 48%) based on absence of stromal invasion, regardless of degree of cytologic atypia or epithelial stratification; of these, 28 (43%) qualified as intraepithelial carcinoma based on epithelial stratification of more than three cell layers or marked cytologic atypia. Tumors with stromal invasion of less than 5 mm were classified as MIBT (n = 8; 6%). Tumors with stromal invasion of more than 5 mm were classified as MUCCA (n = 24; 18%). Tumors with a nodular pattern of stromal invasion, morphology inconsistent with ovarian origin, or a primary site elsewhere were classified as METCA (n = 35; 26%). Four tumors could not be definitively classified. Of the 86 cases with follow-up (median, 33 months) all MBTs (n = 44) and MIBTs (n = 6) were stage I, with 5-year survival rates of 100%. MUCCAs (n = 17) that were stage I had a 5-year survival rate of 91%; all patients with advanced-stage MUCCA died of disease. Five-year survival rate for METCAs (n = 19) was 11%. METCAs were more common than MUCCAs but can mimic MUCCAs and MBTs clinically and histologically. In the absence of a primary site elsewhere, METCA should be strongly suspected when there is bilateral surface involvement and a characteristic nodular pattern of invasion. It is important to recognize this pattern because 5-year survival rate for METCA (11%) was substantially less than that of MUCCA (all stages, 51%) and MBT (100%). Because all MBTs, regardless of degree of atypia or stratification, were stage I and benign, we prefer to designate them as atypical proliferative mucinous tumors. Marked cytologic atypia, epithelial stratification of more than three layers, and microinvasion (<5 mm) had no effect on the behavior of MBT. Noninvasive mucinous tumors with marked cytologic atypia or excessive epithelial stratification can be interpreted as atypical proliferative tumors with intraepithelial carcinoma and those with microinvasion can be designated as atypical proliferative tumors with microinvasion; these tumors appear to represent transitional stages in ovarian mucinous carcinogenesis.
卵巢黏液性交界性肿瘤(MBT)与浸润性黏液癌(MUCCA)鉴别的组织学标准以及上皮内(非浸润性)癌和微浸润的定义存在争议。腹膜假黏液瘤(PMP)是一种卵巢外起源的病变,将PMP病例纳入以及将PMP和转移性黏液癌(METCA)中的卵巢肿瘤错误分类为晚期MBT或原发性卵巢MUCCA,使得对这些肿瘤行为的准确评估变得模糊不清。对136例无PMP的肠型卵巢黏液性肿瘤进行评估,观察其是否存在间质浸润、显著的细胞学异型性、上皮细胞分层超过三层以及坏死情况。确立了MBT、伴上皮内癌的MBT、伴微浸润的MBT(MIBT)、MUCCA和METCA的诊断标准,并将其与肿瘤行为相关联。39例肿瘤间质浸润超过5mm的患者中,23例(59%)死于疾病。间质浸润超过5mm是唯一与预后不良相关的特征。在没有这一特征的情况下,显著的细胞学异型性、上皮细胞分层超过三层、微浸润(<5mm)或坏死对生存没有不良影响。无论细胞学异型性程度或上皮细胞分层情况如何,根据无间质浸润将肿瘤分类为MBT(n = 65;48%);其中,28例(43%)基于上皮细胞分层超过三层或显著的细胞学异型性被判定为上皮内癌。间质浸润小于5mm的肿瘤被分类为MIBT(n = 8;6%)。间质浸润超过5mm的肿瘤被分类为MUCCA(n = 24;18%)。具有结节状间质浸润模式、形态与卵巢起源不符或原发部位在其他地方的肿瘤被分类为METCA(n = 35;26%)。4例肿瘤无法明确分类。在86例有随访(中位随访时间33个月)的病例中,所有MBT(n = 44)和MIBT(n = 6)均为I期,5年生存率为100%。I期的MUCCA(n = 17)5年生存率为91%;所有晚期MUCCA患者均死于疾病。METCA(n = 19)的5年生存率为11%。METCA比MUCCA更常见,但在临床和组织学上可与MUCCA和MBT相似。在没有其他原发部位的情况下,当存在双侧表面受累和特征性的结节状浸润模式时,应高度怀疑METCA。认识到这种模式很重要,因为METCA的5年生存率(11%)远低于MUCCA(所有分期,51%)和MBT(100%)。由于所有MBT,无论异型性程度或分层情况如何,均为I期且为良性,我们更倾向于将它们指定为非典型增生性黏液性肿瘤。显著的细胞学异型性、上皮细胞分层超过三层和微浸润(<5mm)对MBT的行为没有影响。具有显著细胞学异型性或过度上皮细胞分层的非浸润性黏液性肿瘤可解释为伴有上皮内癌的非典型增生性肿瘤,而具有微浸润的肿瘤可指定为伴有微浸润的非典型增生性肿瘤;这些肿瘤似乎代表了卵巢黏液性癌发生过程中的过渡阶段。