Abraham P, Carter D, Bickert S, Desvaux B, Saumet J L
Laboratoire de Physiologie et d'Exploration Fonctionnelles, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Angers, France.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1999 Jun;39(2):93-100.
To study the possible use of transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure measurements to estimate ventilatory threshold during exercise.
comparative study.
Institutional practice, ambulatory care. Patients and measures: seventy-nine subjects.
incremental exercise tests with simultaneous recordings of breath by breath gas exchange and transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure.
Six reviewers determined the ventilatory threshold using both the graphs for the carbon dioxide excretion to oxygen consumption relationship: V slope technique (VTa), and the ventilatory equivalent for oxygen uptake changes over time: (VTb), the respiratory compensation point (RCP) on ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide, and the transcutaneous threshold (Ttc) on the transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure changes over time respectively.
A Ttc could be defined by all observers in 85% of the subjects. Correlation between Ttc and VT expressed as oxygen consumption absolute values ranged from 0.971 to 0.975 on the mean values of six observers. Using the Bland-Altmann approach, differences (mean +/- SD) were 13 +/- 215, -40 +/- 204, 231 +/- 221 ml.min-1 between Ttc and VTa, RCP respectively. A difference of 38 +/- 173 ml.min-1 was found between VTa and VTb. This suggests that Ttc shows little difference with VT but not with RCP.
We suggest that a carbon dioxide transcutaneous threshold can be found close to the ventilatory threshold. Potential clinical use of transcutaneous device are vast.
研究经皮二氧化碳分压测量在运动期间估计通气阈值的可能用途。
比较研究。
机构实践,门诊护理。患者与测量:79名受试者。
递增运动试验,同时逐次记录气体交换和经皮二氧化碳分压。
六名评估者分别使用二氧化碳排出量与耗氧量关系图(V斜率技术,VTa)、摄氧量通气当量随时间变化(VTb)、二氧化碳通气当量的呼吸补偿点(RCP)以及经皮二氧化碳分压随时间变化的经皮阈值(Ttc)来确定通气阈值。
85%的受试者所有观察者均可定义Ttc。以耗氧量绝对值表示的Ttc与VT之间的相关性在六名观察者的平均值上范围为0.971至0.975。使用Bland-Altmann方法,Ttc与VTa、RCP之间的差异(均值±标准差)分别为13±215、-40±204、231±221 ml·min⁻¹。VTa与VTb之间的差异为38±173 ml·min⁻¹。这表明Ttc与VT差异不大,但与RCP差异较大。
我们认为可以找到接近通气阈值的经皮二氧化碳阈值。经皮设备的潜在临床用途广泛。