• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经静脉导线进行心房除颤:主动电极片电击路径的随机比较

Atrial defibrillation with a transvenous lead: a randomized comparison of active can shocking pathways.

作者信息

Cooklin M, Olsovsky M R, Brockman R G, Shorofsky S R, Gold M R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore 21201, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Aug;34(2):358-62. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00214-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00214-4
PMID:10440146
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare transvenous atrial defibrillation thresholds with lead configurations consisting of an active left pectoral electrode and either single or dual transvenous coils.

BACKGROUND

Low atrial defibrillation thresholds are achieved using complex lead systems including coils in the coronary sinus. However, the efficacy of more simple ventricular defibrillation leads with active pectoral pulse generators to defibrillate atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, randomized assessment of shock configuration on atrial defibrillation thresholds in 32 patients. The lead system was a dual coil Endotak DSP lead with a left pectoral pulse generator emulator. Shocks were delivered either between the right ventricular coil and an active can in common with the proximal atrial coil (triad) or between the atrial coil and active can (transatrial).

RESULTS

Delivered energy at defibrillation threshold was 7.1 +/- 6.0 J in the transatrial configuration and 4.0 +/- 4.2 J in the triad configuration (p < 0.005). Moreover, a low threshold (< or = 3 J) was observed in 69% of subjects in the triad configuration but only 47% in the transatrial configuration. Peak voltage and shock impedance were also lowered significantly in the triad configuration. Left atrial size was the only clinical predictor of the defibrillation threshold (r = 0.57, p < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that low atrial defibrillation thresholds can be achieved using a single-pass transvenous ventricular defibrillation lead with a conventional ventricular defibrillation pathway. These data support the development of the combined atrial and ventricular defibrillator system.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经静脉心房除颤阈值,其采用由一个主动式左胸电极与单根或双根经静脉线圈组成的导联配置。

背景

使用包括冠状窦线圈在内的复杂导联系统可实现较低的心房除颤阈值。然而,带有主动胸壁脉冲发生器的更简单的心室除颤导联对房颤(AF)进行除颤的疗效尚不清楚。

方法

本研究是一项对32例患者心房除颤阈值的电击配置进行前瞻性、随机评估的研究。导联系统是带有左胸脉冲发生器模拟器的双线圈Endotak DSP导联。电击在右心室线圈与与近端心房线圈共用的主动电极罐之间(三联组)或在心房线圈与主动电极罐之间(经心房)进行。

结果

经心房配置下除颤阈值时的释放能量为7.1±6.0 J,三联组配置下为4.0±4.2 J(p<0.005)。此外,三联组配置中69%的受试者观察到低阈值(≤3 J),而经心房配置中仅为47%。三联组配置中的峰值电压和电击阻抗也显著降低。左心房大小是除颤阈值的唯一临床预测指标(r = 0.57,p<0.002)。

结论

这些结果表明,使用具有传统心室除颤路径的单通道经静脉心室除颤导联可实现较低的心房除颤阈值。这些数据支持心房和心室联合除颤器系统的开发。

相似文献

1
Atrial defibrillation with a transvenous lead: a randomized comparison of active can shocking pathways.经静脉导线进行心房除颤:主动电极片电击路径的随机比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Aug;34(2):358-62. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00214-4.
2
Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.有源胸壁脉冲发生器对心房除颤阈值无益处。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Apr;13(4):332-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00332.x.
3
Optimization of atrial defibrillation with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.采用双线圈主动胸导联系统优化心房除颤
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 Jul;15(7):790-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03684.x.
4
Coronary sinus electrode does not reduce atrial defibrillation thresholds.冠状窦电极不会降低心房除颤阈值。
Heart Rhythm. 2006 Jun;3(6):647-52. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.02.1029. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
5
Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.采用双线圈主动胸导联系统时心房除颤阈值的临床预测因素
Heart Rhythm. 2005 Jan;2(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.10.033.
6
Comparison of single- and dual-coil active pectoral defibrillation lead systems.单线圈与双线圈主动式胸壁除颤导线系统的比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 May;31(6):1391-4. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00103-x.
7
Lead system optimization for transvenous defibrillation.经静脉除颤的导联系统优化
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Nov 1;80(9):1163-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00633-4.
8
Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds.用于主动罐除颤阈值的经静脉线圈位置优化。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000 Jan;11(1):25-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2000.tb00731.x.
9
The effect of shock configuration and delivered energy on defibrillation impedance.电击配置和输送能量对除颤阻抗的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Jan;22(1 Pt 2):165-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00325.x.
10
Effect of coronary sinus electrode on the optimal atrial defibrillation pathway for an atrioventricular defibrillator.冠状窦电极对房室除颤器最佳心房除颤路径的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;14(1):32-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02354.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy of single-coil versus dual-coil ICD leads: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.单线圈与双线圈植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)导线的比较疗效:临床结局的荟萃分析
Future Cardiol. 2025 Mar;21(3):167-175. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2459542. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
2
Is An Atrial Defibrillator Still An Option In Treating Patients With Atrial Fibrillation?心房除颤器仍是治疗心房颤动患者的一种选择吗?
J Atr Fibrillation. 2013 Feb 12;5(5):594. doi: 10.4022/jafib.594. eCollection 2013 Feb-Mar.
3
Dual- versus single-coil implantable defibrillator leads: review of the literature.
双线圈与单线圈植入式除颤器导线:文献回顾。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Apr;101(4):239-45. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0407-z. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
4
Implantable dual-chamber defibrillator for the selective treatment of spontaneous atrial and ventricular arrhythmias: arrhythmia incidence and device performance.用于选择性治疗自发性房性和室性心律失常的植入式双腔除颤器:心律失常发生率和设备性能
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005 Mar;12(2):149-56. doi: 10.1007/s10840-005-6551-5.