• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诺丁汉健康量表:哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的得分分布、内部一致性及效度

The Nottingham Health Profile: score distribution, internal consistency and validity in asthma and COPD patients.

作者信息

Jans M P, Schellevis F G, van Eijk J T

机构信息

Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO Institute), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 1999 Sep;8(6):501-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1008922405760.

DOI:10.1023/a:1008922405760
PMID:10548865
Abstract

This cross-sectional study among patients with asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in general practice examined the psychometric properties of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). From 380 asthma patients and 170 COPD patients, data were obtained on the NHP, subjective measurements (i.e. sleep disturbances, problems in performing household activities, dyspnoea) and more objective measurements (peak expiratory flow rate, consultation rate, comorbidity). These data were used to compute score distributions, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha-coefficient) and construct validity. Score distributions were very skewed, with more than 50% of the patients achieving the best score. The internal consistency was moderate in the asthma group (mean alpha = 0.68) and acceptable in the COPD group (mean alpha = 0.74). Acceptable construct validity was found in both groups. Correlations between the NHP and the subjective measurements were, in general, statistically significant and higher than between the NHP and the more objective measurements. In conclusion, acceptable internal consistency and construct validity implies that the NHP can be used in cross-sectional studies concerning asthma and COPD patients in general practice, and in studies comparing these patients with other patient populations. Further research on the responsiveness of the NHP is needed to justify its use in longitudinal studies.

摘要

这项在普通医疗中针对哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者开展的横断面研究,考察了诺丁汉健康量表(NHP)的心理测量特性。从380名哮喘患者和170名COPD患者那里获取了关于NHP、主观测量指标(即睡眠障碍、进行家务活动时的问题、呼吸困难)以及更客观测量指标(呼气峰值流速、就诊率、合并症)的数据。这些数据被用于计算得分分布、内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数)和结构效度。得分分布严重偏态,超过50%的患者获得了最佳分数。哮喘组的内部一致性中等(平均α = 0.68),COPD组的内部一致性可接受(平均α = 0.74)。两组均发现有可接受的结构效度。总体而言,NHP与主观测量指标之间的相关性具有统计学意义,且高于NHP与更客观测量指标之间的相关性。总之,可接受的内部一致性和结构效度意味着NHP可用于普通医疗中有关哮喘和COPD患者的横断面研究,以及将这些患者与其他患者群体进行比较的研究。需要对NHP的反应度进行进一步研究,以证明其在纵向研究中的应用合理性。

相似文献

1
The Nottingham Health Profile: score distribution, internal consistency and validity in asthma and COPD patients.诺丁汉健康量表:哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的得分分布、内部一致性及效度
Qual Life Res. 1999 Sep;8(6):501-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1008922405760.
2
Evaluation of two health status measures in adults with growth hormone deficiency.对成年生长激素缺乏症患者两种健康状况测量方法的评估。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003 Apr;58(4):436-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01736.x.
3
Are results of the SF-36 health survey and the Nottingham Health Profile similar? A comparison in COPD patients. Quality of Life in COPD Study Group.SF-36健康调查结果与诺丁汉健康量表的结果相似吗?慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的比较。慢性阻塞性肺疾病研究组生活质量研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Apr;50(4):463-73. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00420-9.
4
Development and psychometric analysis of the Japanese version of the Nottingham Health Profile: cross-cultural adaptation.诺丁汉健康量表日语版的编制及心理测量学分析:跨文化调适
Intern Med. 2004 Jan;43(1):35-41. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.43.35.
5
Performance of a short lung-specific health status measure in outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.一种简短的肺部特异性健康状况测量方法在慢性阻塞性肺疾病门诊患者中的应用效果
Respir Med. 1999 Jul;93(7):467-75. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(99)90089-6.
6
Testing the measurement properties of the Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey among male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Quality of Life in COPD Study Group.在患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病的男性患者中测试西班牙语版SF-36健康调查的测量属性。慢性阻塞性肺疾病研究组生活质量研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1087-94. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00100-0.
7
Validation of the Clinical COPD questionnaire in Italian language.意大利语版慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床问卷的验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Feb 7;3:9. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-9.
8
NHP or SIP--a comparative study in renal insufficiency associated anemia.非那吡啶或司坦唑醇——肾功能不全相关性贫血的一项对比研究
Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/BF00435973.
9
The influence of an inhaled steroid on quality of life in patients with asthma or COPD.吸入性类固醇对哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者生活质量的影响。
Chest. 1995 May;107(5):1199-205. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.5.1199.
10
Responsiveness, longitudinal- and cross-sectional construct validity of the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) in Dutch children with asthma.荷兰哮喘儿童的儿童哮喘生活质量问卷(PAQLQ)的反应性、纵向和横断面结构效度。
Qual Life Res. 2005 Feb;14(1):265-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of life assessment scales in polio survivors: a scoping review.脊髓灰质炎幸存者生存质量评估量表的研究进展:综述
Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2341-2357. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02185-x. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
2
Health status profile and health-related quality of life of veterans attending an out-patient clinic.门诊就诊退伍军人的健康状况概况和健康相关生活质量。
Med Sci Monit. 2013 May 22;19:386-92. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889097.
3
Sensitivity to environmental irritants and quality of life in COPD.COPD 患者对环境刺激物的敏感性与生活质量。

本文引用的文献

1
Are results of the SF-36 health survey and the Nottingham Health Profile similar? A comparison in COPD patients. Quality of Life in COPD Study Group.SF-36健康调查结果与诺丁汉健康量表的结果相似吗?慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的比较。慢性阻塞性肺疾病研究组生活质量研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Apr;50(4):463-73. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00420-9.
2
An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument.四种通用健康状况测量方法的实证比较。诺丁汉健康量表、医学结果研究36项简短健康调查、COOP/WONCA图表以及欧洲生活质量量表。
Med Care. 1997 May;35(5):522-37. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199705000-00008.
3
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:685-91. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S25839. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
4
Symptoms induced by environmental irritants and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic cough - A cross-sectional study.环境刺激物诱发的症状与慢性咳嗽患者的健康相关生活质量——一项横断面研究。
Cough. 2011 Oct 7;7:6. doi: 10.1186/1745-9974-7-6.
5
A comparison of the responsiveness of different generic health status measures in patients with asthma.哮喘患者中不同通用健康状况测量指标的反应性比较。
Qual Life Res. 2003 Aug;12(5):555-63. doi: 10.1023/a:1025051829223.
6
Validity of the St George's respiratory questionnaire at acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: comparison with the Nottingham health profile.圣乔治呼吸问卷在慢性支气管炎急性加重期的效度:与诺丁汉健康量表的比较
Qual Life Res. 2003 Mar;12(2):117-32. doi: 10.1023/a:1022280532276.
NHP or SIP--a comparative study in renal insufficiency associated anemia.
非那吡啶或司坦唑醇——肾功能不全相关性贫血的一项对比研究
Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/BF00435973.
4
Diagnosis of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice.全科医疗中哮喘与慢性阻塞性肺疾病的诊断
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Mar;46(404):193-7.
5
Randomised comparison of guided self management and traditional treatment of asthma over one year.为期一年的哮喘自我管理指导与传统治疗的随机对照比较。
BMJ. 1996 Mar 23;312(7033):748-52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7033.748.
6
The Dutch version of the Nottingham Health Profile: investigations of psychometric aspects.《诺丁汉健康量表》荷兰语版本:心理测量学方面的研究
Psychol Rep. 1993 Jun;72(3 Pt 1):1027-35. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.72.3.1027.
7
The Nottingham Health Profile as a measure of quality of life in zoster patients: convergent and discriminant validity.诺丁汉健康量表作为带状疱疹患者生活质量的衡量指标:聚合效度和区分效度
Qual Life Res. 1994 Dec;3(6):431-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00435395.
8
The influence of an inhaled steroid on quality of life in patients with asthma or COPD.吸入性类固醇对哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者生活质量的影响。
Chest. 1995 May;107(5):1199-205. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.5.1199.
9
Weighting the seriousness of perceived health problems using Thurstone's method of paired comparisons.使用瑟斯顿配对比较法权衡感知到的健康问题的严重性。
Int J Epidemiol. 1981 Mar;10(1):93-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/10.1.93.
10
Perceived health: age and sex comparisons in a community.感知健康:社区中的年龄与性别比较
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1984 Jun;38(2):156-60. doi: 10.1136/jech.38.2.156.