• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭和车内禁烟:真正需要禁烟的人做到了吗?

Smoking bans in the home and car: Do those who really need them have them?

作者信息

Norman G J, Ribisl K M, Howard-Pitney B, Howard K A

机构信息

Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, Palo Alto 94304, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 1999 Dec;29(6 Pt 1):581-9. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0574.

DOI:10.1006/pmed.1999.0574
PMID:10600441
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This paper addresses the question of whether individuals who are most in need of household and car smoking bans, such as individuals with children living at home or who have many friends who smoke, are the ones who have them.

METHOD

A representative sample of 6985 California adults ages 18 and older participated in telephone interviews.

RESULTS

Overall, 76% of adults report having home smoking bans and 66% have car smoking bans. Being a smoker or African American, not having children in the home, having more friends who smoke, and lower household income were associated with lower prevalence of both home and car smoking bans (P < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, nonsmokers were 7.9 (95% CI = 3.56, 17.31) times more likely to have a home smoking ban when none of their friends were smokers compared to when most of their friends were smokers. Among smokers, there was an interaction between having children at home and the proportion of friends who smoke. Only 27 to 55% of smokers had home smoking bans unless most of their friends were smokers, then the odds of having a ban were 6.1 (95% CI = 2.76, 13.68) times higher for smokers with children (67% with home bans) than for smokers without children at home (25% with home bans).

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to increase home and car smoking bans for nonsmokers who have friends who smoke and smokers with children living at home are needed.

摘要

背景

本文探讨了最需要家庭和车内禁烟规定的人群,如家中有孩子的人或有许多吸烟朋友的人,是否拥有这些规定。

方法

对6985名年龄在18岁及以上的加利福尼亚成年人进行了具有代表性的电话访谈。

结果

总体而言,76%的成年人报告家中有禁烟规定,66%的人报告车内有禁烟规定。吸烟者、非裔美国人、家中没有孩子、有更多吸烟的朋友以及家庭收入较低与家庭和车内禁烟规定的较低普及率相关(P < 0.01)。在多变量分析中,与大多数朋友都吸烟的非吸烟者相比,当没有朋友吸烟时,非吸烟者拥有家庭禁烟规定的可能性高出7.9倍(95%置信区间 = 3.56, 17.31)。在吸烟者中,家中有孩子和吸烟朋友的比例之间存在相互作用。只有27%至55%的吸烟者有家庭禁烟规定,除非大多数朋友都吸烟,此时有孩子的吸烟者(67%有家庭禁烟规定)拥有禁烟规定的几率比家中没有孩子的吸烟者(25%有家庭禁烟规定)高出6.1倍(95%置信区间 = 2.76, 13.68)。

结论

需要努力为有吸烟朋友的非吸烟者以及家中有孩子的吸烟者增加家庭和车内禁烟规定。

相似文献

1
Smoking bans in the home and car: Do those who really need them have them?家庭和车内禁烟:真正需要禁烟的人做到了吗?
Prev Med. 1999 Dec;29(6 Pt 1):581-9. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0574.
2
Influences on parents' decisions for home and automobile smoking bans in households with smokers.对有吸烟者家庭中父母关于家庭和汽车禁烟决定的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 19.
3
Do parents of urban children with persistent asthma ban smoking in their homes and cars?患有持续性哮喘的城市儿童的家长是否会在家中和车内禁止吸烟?
Ambul Pediatr. 2006 Mar-Apr;6(2):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2005.10.004.
4
Home smoking bans among U.S. households with children and smokers. Opportunities for intervention.美国家庭中针对有孩子和吸烟者的室内吸烟禁令:干预的机会。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Dec;41(6):559-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.016.
5
Home smoking restrictions. Problems in classification.家庭吸烟限制。分类问题。
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Aug;27(2):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.001.
6
Household characteristics, smoking bans, and passive smoke exposure in young children.家庭特征、吸烟禁令与幼儿被动吸烟暴露情况
J Pediatr Health Care. 2006 Mar-Apr;20(2):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2005.08.006.
7
Residual tobacco smoke pollution in used cars for sale: air, dust, and surfaces.待售二手车中的残留烟草烟雾污染:空气、灰尘和表面。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Sep;10(9):1467-75. doi: 10.1080/14622200802279898.
8
Factors associated with the adoption of a smoking ban in Quebec households.魁北克家庭实施吸烟禁令的相关因素。
Chronic Dis Can. 2009;29(3):128-35.
9
Home smoking bans in Finland and the association with child smoking.芬兰的家庭吸烟禁令及其与儿童吸烟的关联。
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Jun;18(3):306-11. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckm098. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
10
Prevalence and predictors of home and automobile smoking bans and child environmental tobacco smoke exposure: a cross-sectional study of U.S.- and Mexico-born Hispanic women with young children.家庭和汽车吸烟禁令及儿童环境烟草烟雾暴露的患病率和预测因素:一项针对有幼儿的美国和墨西哥出生的西班牙裔女性的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Oct 27;6:265. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-265.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing smoking behaviour of online ride-hailing drivers in China: a cross-sectional analysis.影响中国网约车司机吸烟行为的因素:一项横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):1326. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11366-8.
2
Home smoking and vaping policies among US adults: results from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, wave 3.美国家长在家中吸烟和蒸气吸烟政策:人口评估烟草与健康(PATH)研究,第 3 波结果。
Prev Med. 2020 Oct;139:106215. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106215. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
3
Steps Toward Scalability: Illustrations From a Smoke-Free Homes Program.
迈向可扩展性的步骤:无烟家庭计划实例
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Oct;46(5):773-781. doi: 10.1177/1090198119848767. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
4
Disseminating a Smoke-free Homes Program to Low Socioeconomic Status Households in the United States Through 2-1-1: Results of a National Impact Evaluation.通过 2-1-1 向美国社会经济地位较低的家庭传播无烟家庭计划:全国影响评估结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 17;22(4):498-505. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty256.
5
Moderators of Establishing a Smoke-Free Home: Pooled Data from Three Randomized Controlled Trials of a Brief Intervention.建立无烟家庭的影响因素:简短干预措施的三项随机对照试验的汇总数据。
J Community Health. 2019 Feb;44(1):121-126. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0561-6.
6
Smoke-Free Rules in Homes and Cars Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in Minnesota.明尼苏达州烟民和非烟民家庭和汽车中的无烟规则。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Mar 15;15:E32. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170355.
7
Prevalence and Indicators of Household Smoking Bans Among American Indians.美国印第安人中的家庭禁烟率和相关指标。
J Community Health. 2018 Aug;43(4):746-755. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0479-z.
8
Coaching to create a smoke-free home in a brief secondhand smoke intervention.在简短的二手烟干预中指导创建无烟家庭。
Health Educ Res. 2017 Dec 1;32(6):555-568. doi: 10.1093/her/cyx072.
9
Evaluation of Smoke-free Foster Care Education for Foster and Adoptive Caregivers.
Child Welfare. 2014;93(5):105-116.
10
A Minimal Intervention to Promote Smoke-Free Homes among 2-1-1 Callers: North Carolina Randomized Effectiveness Trial.一项针对 211 热线来电者促进无烟家庭的最小干预措施:北卡罗来纳州随机有效性试验。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 2;11(11):e0165086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165086. eCollection 2016.