Allaire J C, Marsiske M
Institute of Gerontology and Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202-3424, USA.
Psychol Aging. 1999 Dec;14(4):627-44. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.14.4.627.
The primary aim of this study was to examine the relationship between a new battery of everyday cognition measures, which assessed 4 cognitive abilities within 3 familiar real-world domains, and traditional psychometric tests of the same basic cognitive abilities. Several theoreticians have argued that everyday cognition measures are somewhat distinct from traditional cognitive assessment approaches, and the authors investigated this assertion correlationally in the present study. The sample consisted of 174 community-dwelling older adults from the Detroit metropolitan area, who had an average age of 73 years. Major results of the study showed that (a) each everyday cognitive test was strongly correlated with the basic cognitive abilities; (b) several basic abilities, as well as measures of domain-specific knowledge, predicted everyday cognitive performance; and (c) everyday and basic measures were similarly related to age. The results suggest that everyday cognition is not unrelated to traditional measures, nor is it less sensitive to age-related differences.
本研究的主要目的是检验一组新的日常认知测量方法与相同基本认知能力的传统心理测量测试之间的关系,该日常认知测量方法评估了3个熟悉的现实世界领域中的4种认知能力。几位理论家认为,日常认知测量在一定程度上有别于传统认知评估方法,作者在本研究中对这一观点进行了相关性调查。样本包括来自底特律都会区的174名社区居住的老年人,他们的平均年龄为73岁。该研究的主要结果表明:(a)每项日常认知测试都与基本认知能力密切相关;(b)几种基本能力以及特定领域知识的测量方法可预测日常认知表现;(c)日常测量和基本测量与年龄的关系相似。结果表明,日常认知与传统测量并非毫无关联,对年龄相关差异也并非不敏感。