• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能与终身学习。有哪些新进展以及我们如何加以利用?

Intelligence and lifelong learning. What's new and how can we use it?

作者信息

Sternberg R J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8205, USA.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 1997 Oct;52(10):1134-9. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.10.1134.

DOI:10.1037//0003-066x.52.10.1134
PMID:9329294
Abstract

The field of intelligence as applied to lifelong learning has some new ideas about what intellectual abilities are and how they can be measured. The field also has come to a realization of what some of the limitations are both of conventional tests and even of new tests that are starting to emerge. What does the future hold for this field? It is in our hands, as a field, to decide.

摘要

应用于终身学习的智力领域对于智力能力是什么以及如何衡量这些能力有了一些新观点。该领域也开始认识到传统测试乃至一些新出现的测试存在哪些局限性。这个领域的未来会怎样?作为一个领域,决定权在我们手中。

相似文献

1
Intelligence and lifelong learning. What's new and how can we use it?智能与终身学习。有哪些新进展以及我们如何加以利用?
Am Psychol. 1997 Oct;52(10):1134-9. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.10.1134.
2
Relationships between scores on Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence--Revised and Stanford-Binet IV.韦氏学前及初小儿童智力量表修订版(WPPSI-R)与斯坦福-比奈智力量表第四版(SB-IV)得分之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 1991 Aug;69(1):23-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.1.23.
3
Relations of scores on the Stanford Binet Fourth Edition and form L-M: concurrent validation study with children who have mental retardation.斯坦福-比奈智力量表第四版L-M型得分之间的关系:针对智力发育迟缓儿童的同时效度研究。
Am J Ment Retard. 1995 Mar;99(5):555-8.
4
Comparison of Kaufman's short form of the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales--Fourth Edition.考夫曼儿童能力量表简版与斯坦福-比奈智力量表第四版的比较
Percept Mot Skills. 1992 Jun;74(3 Pt 2):1120-2. doi: 10.2466/pms.1992.74.3c.1120.
5
Correlations between scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III and the General Purpose Abbreviated Battery of the Stanford-Binet IV.韦氏儿童智力量表第三版得分与斯坦福-比奈智力量表第四版通用简版测验得分之间的相关性。
Psychol Rep. 1993 Jun;72(3 Pt 2):1167-70. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.72.3c.1167.
6
Assessment of preschoolers at-risk with the WPPSI--R and the Stanford-Binet L-M.使用韦氏学前和小学儿童智力量表修订版(WPPSI--R)和斯坦福-比奈智力量表L-M对有风险的学龄前儿童进行评估。
Psychol Rep. 1992 Oct;71(2):659-64. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.2.659.
7
Concurrent validity study of the Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised in mental retardation testing.斯隆森智力测验修订版在智力迟钝测试中的同时效度研究。
Ment Retard. 1996 Dec;34(6):380-6.
8
Validation of an item-reduction short form of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition with college students.斯坦福-比奈智力量表第四版项目简化简版在大学生中的效度验证。
J Clin Psychol. 1995 Jan;51(1):63-70. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199501)51:1<63::aid-jclp2270510111>3.0.co;2-d.
9
Intellectual evaluations of children using human figure drawings: an empirical investigation of two methods.使用人物画对儿童进行智力评估:两种方法的实证研究。
J Clin Psychol. 1996 Jan;52(1):67-74. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199601)52:1<67::AID-JCLP9>3.0.CO;2-T.
10
Comparing scores on the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition with the WISC-R for exceptional children.比较超常儿童在斯坦福-比奈智力量表第四版和韦氏儿童智力量表修订版上的得分。
Psychol Rep. 1990 Jun;66(3 Pt 1):979-84. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1990.66.3.979.

引用本文的文献

1
Viewpoint: Artificial intelligence or cosmogenic intelligence?观点:人工智能还是宇宙生成智能?
Biomater Transl. 2025 Jun 20;6(2):112-113. doi: 10.12336/bmt.25.00057. eCollection 2025.
2
Choosing explanation over performance: Insights from machine learning-based prediction of human intelligence from brain connectivity.选择解释而非性能:基于机器学习从脑连接预测人类智力的见解。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Dec 10;3(12):pgae519. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae519. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
How Cognitive Ability Shapes Personality Differentiation in Real Job Candidates: Insights from a Large-Scale Study.
认知能力如何塑造实际求职者的个性差异:一项大规模研究的见解
J Intell. 2024 Mar 16;12(3):34. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12030034.
4
Contemporary reflection on the educational levels of high-performance soccer players in Brazil.当代视角下巴西高水准足球运动员的受教育水平研究
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2023 Oct 23;21:eAO0269. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0269. eCollection 2023.
5
Scientific Intelligence: Recognising It to Nurture It.科学智慧:认识它以培育它。
J Intell. 2023 Mar 27;11(4):60. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040060.
6
The role of sexting in couple wellbeing for Italian women during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情第二波期间,色情短信对意大利女性伴侣幸福感的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 8;14:1105556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105556. eCollection 2023.
7
Multimodal Brain Signal Complexity Predicts Human Intelligence.多模态脑信号复杂度预测人类智力。
eNeuro. 2023 Feb 8;10(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0345-22.2022. Print 2023 Feb.
8
Profiling of Learners in Medical Schools as a Move Toward Precision Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.医学院校学习者剖析以迈向精准教育:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Oct 28;11(10):e41828. doi: 10.2196/41828.
9
Increasing creative self-efficacy: Developing the confidence of biochemistry undergraduates to innovate.提高创新自我效能感:培养生物化学专业本科生的创新信心。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2022 May;50(3):296-306. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21628. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
10
Sport Practice, Fluid Reasoning, and Soft Skills in 10- to 18-Year-Olds.10至18岁青少年的体育锻炼、流体智力和软技能
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Mar 14;16:857412. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.857412. eCollection 2022.