Ambrosini P J
MCP Hahnemann University, Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, Philadelphia 19129, USA.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000 Jan;39(1):49-58. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200001000-00016.
To review the historical development, reliability, validity, administrative characteristics, and uses of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS).
The various past and current K-SADS editions were reviewed as was the literature describing their uses.
Three DSM-IV-compatible versions of the K-SADS are in general use, 1 present state (K-SADS-P IVR) and 2 epidemiological editions (K-SADS-E and K-SADS-P/L). All 3 interviews provide a current diagnostic assessment. The K-SADS-P IVR also evaluates the worst past episode during the preceding year, while the K-SADS-E and -P/L provide a lifetime diagnosis. The K-SADS-E and -P/L are primarily categorical diagnostic interviews while the K-SADS-P IVR, which also measures symptom severity, can be used to monitor treatment response. All editions have good rater reliability. However, the quality of the validating data set for the K-SADS is limiting.
The K-SADS is a viable interview schedule to assess current, past, and lifetime diagnostic status in children and adolescents. It is has the potential to further aide in the validation of psychiatric disorders. The substantial rater training required for reliable administration and the need for more validation work remain its drawbacks.
回顾儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症评定量表(K-SADS)的历史发展、信度、效度、管理特征及用途。
对过去和当前的各种K-SADS版本以及描述其用途的文献进行了回顾。
目前普遍使用三个与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)兼容的K-SADS版本,1个现状版(K-SADS-P IVR)和2个流行病学版(K-SADS-E和K-SADS-P/L)。所有这三种访谈均提供当前诊断评估。K-SADS-P IVR还评估前一年中最严重的过去发作情况,而K-SADS-E和-P/L提供终生诊断。K-SADS-E和-P/L主要是分类诊断访谈,而K-SADS-P IVR还可测量症状严重程度,可用于监测治疗反应。所有版本均具有良好的评分者信度。然而,K-SADS验证数据集的质量有限。
K-SADS是一种可行的访谈量表,可用于评估儿童和青少年当前、过去和终生的诊断状况。它有可能进一步辅助精神疾病的验证。可靠实施所需的大量评分者培训以及更多验证工作的需求仍然是其缺点。