• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生活质量与家庭肠内管饲:一项针对头颈部或食管癌患者的法国前瞻性研究。

Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: a French prospective study in patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer.

作者信息

Roberge C, Tran M, Massoud C, Poirée B, Duval N, Damecour E, Frout D, Malvy D, Joly F, Lebailly P, Henry-Amar M

机构信息

Service de Recherche Clinique, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2000 Jan;82(2):263-9. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0913.

DOI:10.1054/bjoc.1999.0913
PMID:10646875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2363272/
Abstract

A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of home enteral tube feeding on quality of life in 39 consecutive patients treated for head and neck or oesophageal cancer at the Centre François Baclesse in Caen, France. Patients were taken as their own controls. Quality of life was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire, and the EORTC H&N35 and OES24 specific questionnaires. The feeding technique tolerance was evaluated using a questionnaire specifically developed for this study. Two evaluations were made, the first a week after hospital discharge (n = 39) and the second 3 weeks later (n = 30). Overall, the global health status/quality of life scale score slightly improved; among symptoms, scale scores that significantly improved (P < 0.05) concerned constipation, coughing, social functioning and body image/sexuality. The physical feeding technique tolerance was acceptable while the technique was psychologically less tolerated with two-thirds of the patients longing to have the tube removed. One third of the patients was also uncomfortable about their body image. Home enteral tube feeding was responsible for not visiting family or close relations in 15% of patients, and not going out in public in 23%. We conclude that home enteral tube feeding is a physically well accepted technique although a substantial proportion of patients may experience psychosocial distress.

摘要

在法国卡昂的弗朗索瓦·巴克莱中心,对39例连续接受头颈部或食管癌治疗的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,以评估家庭肠内管饲对生活质量的影响。患者以自身作为对照。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-C30核心问卷以及EORTC H&N35和OES24特定问卷对生活质量进行评估。使用专门为本研究开发的问卷评估喂养技术耐受性。进行了两次评估,第一次在出院后一周(n = 39),第二次在3周后(n = 30)。总体而言,全球健康状况/生活质量量表评分略有改善;在症状方面,显著改善(P < 0.05)的量表评分涉及便秘、咳嗽、社会功能以及身体形象/性功能。身体喂养技术耐受性尚可,而该技术在心理上的耐受性较差,三分之二的患者渴望拔除管道。三分之一的患者对自己的身体形象也感到不适。家庭肠内管饲导致15%的患者不去探望家人或近亲,23%的患者不出门。我们得出结论,家庭肠内管饲是一种身体上易于接受的技术,尽管相当一部分患者可能会经历心理社会困扰。

相似文献

1
Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: a French prospective study in patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer.生活质量与家庭肠内管饲:一项针对头颈部或食管癌患者的法国前瞻性研究。
Br J Cancer. 2000 Jan;82(2):263-9. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0913.
2
Perioperative enteral nutrition and quality of life of severely malnourished head and neck cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial.围手术期肠内营养与重度营养不良头颈癌患者的生活质量:一项随机临床试验
Clin Nutr. 2000 Dec;19(6):437-44. doi: 10.1054/clnu.2000.0148.
3
Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample.使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)对韩国样本中接受癌症疼痛管理的晚期患者的生活质量变化进行评估。
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:7-12. doi: 10.1159/000143212. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
4
The relationship between observer-based toxicity scoring and patient assessed symptom severity after treatment for head and neck cancer. A correlative cross sectional study of the DAHANCA toxicity scoring system and the EORTC quality of life questionnaires.头颈部癌治疗后基于观察者的毒性评分与患者自我评估的症状严重程度之间的关系。一项关于丹麦头颈癌组(DAHANCA)毒性评分系统与欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷的相关性横断面研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2006 Mar;78(3):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.02.005. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
5
Quality of life following breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: results of a 5-year prospective study.保乳治疗或乳房切除术后的生活质量:一项5年前瞻性研究的结果。
Breast J. 2004 May-Jun;10(3):223-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21323.x.
6
Variables associated with feeding tube placement in head and neck cancer.与头颈部癌症患者饲管置入相关的变量
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Jun;132(6):655-61. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.6.655.
7
Distress in spouses and patients after treatment for head and neck cancer.头颈癌治疗后配偶及患者的困扰
Laryngoscope. 2007 Feb;117(2):238-41. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000250169.10241.58.
8
Quality of life in long-term home enteral nutrition patients.
Clin Nutr. 2000 Feb;19(1):23-8. doi: 10.1054/clnu.1999.0068.
9
A prospective study of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Part I: at diagnosis.一项关于头颈癌患者生活质量的前瞻性研究。第一部分:诊断时。
Laryngoscope. 2001 Apr;111(4 Pt 1):669-80. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200104000-00021.
10
A cross sectional quality of life study of 116 recurrence free head and neck cancer patients. The first use of EORTC H&N35 in Danish.一项针对116名无复发头颈癌患者的横断面生活质量研究。EORTC H&N35首次在丹麦使用。
Acta Oncol. 2006;45(1):28-37. doi: 10.1080/02841860500417536.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution of sexual health of patients with head and neck cancer before, during, and 1 year after treatment.头颈癌患者在治疗前、治疗期间及治疗后1年的性健康状况演变。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Apr 17;33(5):392. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09450-5.
2
Poor nutrition status associated with low patient satisfaction six months into treatment for head and neck/esophageal cancer treatment: A prospective multicenter cohort study.头颈癌/食管癌治疗六个月时,营养状况差与患者满意度低相关:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;40(2):405-419. doi: 10.1002/ncp.11211. Epub 2024 Sep 22.
3
Pediatric to adult transition care in neurogastroenterology and motility: A position paper from the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.神经胃肠病学和动力学会儿科到成人过渡护理:美国神经胃肠病学和动力学会和欧洲神经胃肠病学和动力学会的立场文件。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Oct;36(10):e14869. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14869. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
4
A scoping review of best practices in home enteral tube feeding.家庭肠内管饲最佳实践的范围综述。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022 Aug 4;23:e43. doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000366.
5
Survey of Psychosocial Issues of Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients.头颈部癌症患者鼻饲管喂养的心理社会问题调查
Indian J Palliat Care. 2021 Jan-Mar;27(1):113-117. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_255_20. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
6
Supplemental enteral tube feeding nutrition after hospital discharge of esophageal cancer patients who have undergone esophagectomy.食管癌患者术后出院后的补充肠内管饲营养。
Esophagus. 2021 Jul;18(3):504-512. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00803-z. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
Specific Quality of Life Assessment by the NutriQoL® Questionnaire Among Patients Receiving Home Enteral Nutrition.NutriQoL® 问卷对接受家庭肠内营养患者的特定生活质量评估。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021 Mar;45(3):490-498. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1852. Epub 2020 May 27.
8
The Effect of Enteral Tube Feeding on Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review.肠内管饲对患者健康相关生活质量的影响:系统评价。
Nutrients. 2019 May 10;11(5):1046. doi: 10.3390/nu11051046.
9
Home enteral nutrition recipients: patient perspectives on training, complications and satisfaction.家庭肠内营养接受者:患者对培训、并发症及满意度的看法。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;8(1):79-84. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2016-100736. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
10
Quality of life and dietary changes among cancer patients: a systematic review.癌症患者的生活质量与饮食变化:一项系统综述
Qual Life Res. 2015 Mar;24(3):705-19. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0802-9. Epub 2014 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of life of patients receiving home parenteral or enteral nutrition support.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Feb;5(2):101-8. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199405020-00004.
2
Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35.头颈癌患者的生活质量:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷-H&N35的验证
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Mar;17(3):1008-19. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.1008.
3
Should cancer patients with incurable disease receive parenteral or enteral nutritional support?患有不治之症的癌症患者应该接受肠外营养支持还是肠内营养支持?
Eur J Cancer. 1998 Feb;34(3):279-85. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)10049-1.
4
Nasogastric and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy treatment at a regional oncology unit: a two year study.在某地区肿瘤治疗中心接受放疗的头颈癌患者中进行鼻胃管和经皮内镜下胃造口术喂养:一项为期两年的研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1997 Mar;6(1):45-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1997.tb00268.x.
5
Performance and quality of life outcome in patients completing concomitant chemoradiotherapy protocols for head and neck cancer.
Qual Life Res. 1997 Apr;6(3):274-84. doi: 10.1023/a:1026419023481.
6
Nutritional support.
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 2;336(1):41-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701023360107.
7
Development of an EORTC questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessment for patients with oesophageal cancer. The EORTC Quality of Life Study Group.开发一个用于食管癌患者生活质量评估的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)问卷模块。EORTC生活质量研究小组。
Eur J Cancer. 1996 Oct;32A(11):1912-7. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00199-2.
8
Nutrition therapy for the cancer patient.癌症患者的营养治疗
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1996 Feb;10(1):221-34. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8588(05)70336-1.
9
Concerns, coping and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients.头颈癌患者的担忧、应对方式及生活质量
Support Care Cancer. 1996 May;4(3):186-90. doi: 10.1007/BF01682338.
10
Quality of life and nutritional support in patients with cancer.癌症患者的生活质量与营养支持
Cancer Pract. 1996 Mar-Apr;4(2):81-7.