Halsey N A, Coberly J S, Desormeaux J, Losikoff P, Atkinson J, Moulton L H, Contave M, Johnson M, Davis H, Geiter L, Johnson E, Huebner R, Boulos R, Chaisson R E
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Lancet. 1998 Mar 14;351(9105):786-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06532-X.
Tuberculosis is a common complication of HIV-1 infection, especially in developing countries. Practical and effective chemoprophylaxis regimens for HIV-1-related tuberculosis are needed. Our aim was to test the efficacy of isoniazid versus rifampicin with pyrazinamide for prevention of tuberculosis in HIV-1-positive individuals.
We compared the efficacy of 6 months of isoniazid with 2 months of rifampicin and pyrazinamide for prevention of tuberculosis in HIV-1-seropositive individuals. Eligible participants were aged 16-77 years, HIV-1 seropositive, had a positive purified-protein derivative (PPD) skin test reaction of at least 5 mm, and had a normal chest radiograph. Participants were randomly assigned partially supervised twice weekly isoniazid for 24 weeks or twice weekly rifampicin and pyrazinamide for 8 weeks. Participants were followed up for up to 4 years for the development of tuberculosis and survival.
Tuberculosis developed in 14 (3.8%) of 370 participants assigned isoniazid and 19 (5.0%) of 380 participants assigned rifampicin and pyrazinamide (Cox model rate ratio 1.3 [95% CI 0.7-2.7]). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the risk of tuberculosis during the first 10 months after entry was 3.7% among participants who received rifampicin and pyrazinamide compared with 1.0% (p=0.03) among participants who received isoniazid, and 5.4% versus 5.1%, respectively (p=0.9) at 36 months after entry. Higher rates of tuberculosis were observed in people with baseline CD4 percentages (of total lymphocytes) of less than 20 (rate ratio 4.0 [95% CI 1.8-9.0]). There were no significant differences in total mortality at any time.
Twice-weekly isoniazid preventive therapy for 6 months or rifampicin and pyrazinamide for 2 months provided similar overall protection against tuberculosis in HIV-1-infected, PPD-positive adults. The better protection among recipients of isoniazid during the first 10 months was most likely secondary to the longer duration of chemoprophylaxis. Preventive therapy for HIV-1-seropositive, PPD-positive individuals could be practical in developing countries with a once weekly clinic visit, but optimum duration of chemoprophylaxis has not been determined.
结核病是HIV-1感染的常见并发症,在发展中国家尤为如此。需要实用且有效的针对HIV-1相关结核病的化学预防方案。我们的目的是测试异烟肼与利福平联合吡嗪酰胺预防HIV-1阳性个体患结核病的疗效。
我们比较了6个月异烟肼与2个月利福平联合吡嗪酰胺预防HIV-1血清学阳性个体患结核病的疗效。符合条件的参与者年龄在16 - 77岁之间,HIV-1血清学阳性,纯化蛋白衍生物(PPD)皮肤试验反应至少5毫米为阳性,且胸部X线片正常。参与者被随机分配接受每周两次部分监督的异烟肼治疗24周,或每周两次利福平联合吡嗪酰胺治疗8周。对参与者进行长达4年的随访,观察结核病的发生情况和生存情况。
在分配接受异烟肼治疗的370名参与者中,有14名(3.8%)发生了结核病;在分配接受利福平联合吡嗪酰胺治疗的380名参与者中,有19名(5.0%)发生了结核病(Cox模型率比为1.3 [95%可信区间0.7 - 2.7])。在入组后的前10个月,接受利福平联合吡嗪酰胺治疗的参与者中结核病风险的Kaplan-Meier估计值为3.7%,而接受异烟肼治疗的参与者为1.0%(p = 0.03);在入组36个月时,分别为5.4%和5.1%(p = 0.9)。基线CD4百分比(占总淋巴细胞)低于20的人群中结核病发生率更高(率比为4.0 [95%可信区间1.8 - 9.0])。在任何时间点总死亡率均无显著差异。
对于HIV-1感染、PPD阳性的成年人,每周两次的异烟肼预防性治疗6个月或利福平联合吡嗪酰胺预防性治疗2个月提供了相似的总体预防结核病的效果。在最初10个月中,接受异烟肼治疗者获得更好的保护,这很可能是由于化学预防持续时间更长。对于HIV-1血清学阳性、PPD阳性的个体,在每周有一次门诊就诊的发展中国家,预防性治疗可能是可行的,但化学预防的最佳持续时间尚未确定。