Doughty M J, Zaman M L
Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow-Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Surv Ophthalmol. 2000 Mar-Apr;44(5):367-408. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00110-7.
We determined the "normal" central corneal thickness (CCT) value in human corneas based on reported literature values for within-study average CCT values, and used this as a reference to assess the reported impact of physiological variables (especially age and diurnal effects), contact lens wear, pharmaceuticals, ocular disease, and ophthalmic surgery on CCT. With the expected CCT and its variance defined, it should be possible to determine the potential impact of differences in CCT in intraocular pressure (IOP) assessments, especially by applanation tonometry, using a meta-analysis approach. Some 600 sets of CCT data were identified from the worldwide literature over the period of 1968 through mid-1999, of which 134 included IOP measures as well. The within-study average CCT values and reported variance (SD) was noted along with the number of eyes and any special characteristics, including probable ethnic origin of the study subjects. Various sets of data were subjected to statistical analyses. From 300 data sets from eyes designated as normal, the group-averaged CCT was 0.534 mm. From 230 data sets where interindividual variance was reported, the group-averaged CCT was 0.536 mm (median 0.536 mm; average SD of 0. 031 mm, average coefficient of variation = 5.8%). Overall, studies using slit-lamp-based pachometry have reported marginally lower CCT values (average 0.530 mm, average SD 0.029 mm) compared to ultrasound-based studies (average 0.544, average SD 0.034 mm), which perhaps reflects the type of individual studied (non-surgical vs. pre-surgical patients) rather than the technique itself. A slight chronological increase in reported average CCT values (approximately 0.006 mm/decade) was evident, but a substantial chronological increase was evident for ultrasound pachometry studies (approximately 0.015 mm/decade). Within the meta-analysis-generated average and variance, age had no obvious impact on CCT measures for *whites, although an age-related decline in CCT is evident for non-whites. Any diurnal effects are likely concealed within the expected variance in CCT. Contact lens wear and pharmaceuticals generally produced changes in CCT that were well within the expected variance in CCT. Of the ocular diseases, only those associated with collagen disorders (including keratoconus) or endothelial-based corneal dystrophies (e.g., Fuchs) were likely to result in decreases or increases, respectively, of CCT beyond the normal variance. Routine contact lens wear and diseases such as diabetes seem unlikely to produce changes in CCT of a magnitude that would justify pachometry as a monitoring method beyond routine slit-lamp evaluation. Increases in CCT beyond the expected variance were reported after a range of intraocular surgeries (cataract operations, penetrating keratoplasty), whereas photorefractive surgery produces a measurable decrease in CCT. A meta-analysis of possible association between CCT and IOP measures of 133 data sets, regardless of the type of eyes assessed, revealed a statistically significant correlation; a 10% difference in CCT would result in a 3. 4 +/- 0.9 mm Hg difference in IOP (P </= 0.001, r = 0.419). The observed phenomenon was much smaller for eyes designated as healthy (1.1 +/- 0.6 mm Hg for a 10% difference in CCT, P = 0.023, r = 0. 331). For eyes with chronic diseases, the change was 2.5 +/- 1.1 mm Hg for a 10% difference in CCT (P = 0.005, r = 0.450), whereas a substantial but highly variable association was seen for eyes with acute onset disease (approximately 10.0 +/- 3.1 mm Hg for a 10% difference in CCT, P = 0.004, r = 0.623). Based on the meta-analysis, normal CCT in white adults would be expected to be within +/-11.6% (+/-2 SD) of 0.535 mm, i.e., 0.473-0.597 mm (95% CI, 0.474-0.596). The impact of CCT on applanation tonometry of healthy eyes is unlikely to achieve clinical significance, but for corneas of eyes with chronic disease, pachometry should be performed if the tonometry reveals IOP readi
我们根据已发表文献中各项研究的平均中央角膜厚度(CCT)值,确定了人类角膜的“正常”CCT值,并以此为参照,评估生理变量(尤其是年龄和昼夜效应)、佩戴隐形眼镜、药物、眼部疾病及眼科手术对CCT的影响。在明确了预期的CCT及其方差后,应当可以采用荟萃分析方法,确定CCT差异在眼压(IOP)评估中,尤其是在应用压平眼压计测量时的潜在影响。在1968年至1999年年中期间,从全球文献中识别出约600组CCT数据,其中134组还包含眼压测量数据。记录了各项研究中的平均CCT值、报告的方差(标准差),以及眼数和任何特殊特征,包括研究对象可能的种族来源。对多组数据进行了统计分析。在300组指定为正常眼的数据集里,组平均CCT为0.534mm。在230组报告了个体间方差的数据集中,组平均CCT为0.536mm(中位数0.536mm;平均标准差0.031mm,平均变异系数 = 5.8%)。总体而言,与基于超声的研究(平均0.544,平均标准差0.034mm)相比,使用裂隙灯测厚法的研究报告的CCT值略低(平均0.530mm,平均标准差0.029mm),这可能反映了所研究个体的类型(非手术患者与手术前患者),而非技术本身。报告的平均CCT值有轻微的随时间增长趋势(约0.006mm/十年),但超声测厚法研究中这种随时间的增长趋势较为明显(约0.015mm/十年)。在荟萃分析得出的平均值和方差范围内,年龄对白人的CCT测量值没有明显影响,尽管非白人中CCT随年龄下降较为明显。任何昼夜效应可能都隐藏在CCT的预期方差内。佩戴隐形眼镜和使用药物通常导致的CCT变化都在CCT的预期方差范围内。在眼部疾病中,只有那些与胶原紊乱相关的疾病(包括圆锥角膜)或基于内皮的角膜营养不良(如富克斯角膜营养不良)可能分别导致CCT降低或升高超出正常方差范围。常规佩戴隐形眼镜和糖尿病等疾病似乎不太可能使CCT发生足以证明测厚法作为常规裂隙灯评估之外的监测方法的显著变化。一系列眼内手术后(白内障手术、穿透性角膜移植术)报告的CCT升高超出预期方差,而屈光性手术则使CCT出现可测量的降低。对133组数据集的CCT与眼压测量值之间可能存在的关联进行的荟萃分析显示,无论评估的眼类型如何,二者均存在统计学显著相关性;CCT相差10%会导致眼压相差3.4±0.9mmHg(P≤0.001,r = 0.419)。对于指定为健康的眼睛,观察到的这种现象要小得多(CCT相差10%时为1.1±0.6mmHg,P = 0.023,r = 0.331)。对于患有慢性疾病的眼睛,CCT相差10%时变化为2.5±1.1mmHg(P = 0.005,r = 0.450),而对于急性发病的眼睛,观察到的关联虽大但高度可变(CCT相差10%时约为10.0±3.1mmHg,P = 0.004,r = 0.623)。基于荟萃分析,预计白人成年人的正常CCT在0.535mm的±11.6%(±2标准差)范围内,即0.473 - 0.597mm(95%置信区间,0.474 - 0.596)。CCT对健康眼睛压平眼压计测量的影响不太可能具有临床意义,但对于患有慢性疾病的眼睛,如果眼压测量显示眼压读数异常,应进行测厚法检查。