Suppr超能文献

高层管理团队中的任务冲突与关系冲突:组内信任的关键作用。

Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust.

作者信息

Simons T L, Peterson R S

机构信息

School of Hotel Administration, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-6902, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2000 Feb;85(1):102-11. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102.

Abstract

Task conflict is usually associated with effective decisions, and relationship conflict is associated with poor decisions. The 2 conflict types are typically correlated in ongoing groups, however, which creates a prescriptive dilemma. Three explanations might account for this relationship--misattribution of task conflict as relationship conflict, harsh task conflict tactics triggering relationship conflict, and misattribution of relationship conflict as task conflict. The authors found that intragroup trust moderates the relationship between task conflict and relationship conflict in 70 top management teams. This result supports the "misattribution of task conflict" explanation. The authors also found a weak effect that is consistent with the argument that tactical choices drive the association between the 2 conflict types. We infer that trust is a key to gaining the benefits of task conflict without suffering the costs of relationship conflict.

摘要

任务冲突通常与有效的决策相关联,而关系冲突则与糟糕的决策相关联。然而,这两种冲突类型在持续存在的团队中通常是相互关联的,这就产生了一个规范性的困境。三种解释可能说明这种关系——将任务冲突误归为关系冲突、严厉的任务冲突策略引发关系冲突,以及将关系冲突误归为任务冲突。作者发现,在70个高层管理团队中,团队内部信任调节了任务冲突与关系冲突之间的关系。这一结果支持了“任务冲突误归”的解释。作者还发现了一个微弱的效应,这与战术选择驱动这两种冲突类型之间关联的观点一致。我们推断,信任是在不承受关系冲突成本的情况下获得任务冲突益处的关键。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验