Schaad U B, Bühlmann U, Burger R, Ruedeberg A, Wilder-Smith A, Rutishauser M, Sennhauser F, Herzog C, Zellmeyer M, Glück R
University Children's Hospital Basel, Berne, Switzerland.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 May;44(5):1163-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.5.1163-1167.2000.
The objective of this study was to compare the immunogenicity and safety of a single-dose regimen and a two-dose regimen of a trivalent virosome influenza vaccine (Inflexal Berna V) with those of a trivalent subunit influenza vaccine (Influvac) in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis (CF). In an open, randomized, multicenter study with parallel groups, 11 young children with CF (1 to 6 years old) and 53 older children and adolescents with CF (>6 years old) were randomly assigned to one of the following immunization regimens: virosome vaccine at 0.5 ml on study day 0 or 0.25 ml on days 0 and 28 or a standard regimen of subunit vaccine, i. e., 0.5 ml on day 0 for older children and 0.25 ml on days 0 and 28 for younger children. Safety assessments, i.e., recording of systemic and local adverse events (AEs) and vital signs, were made for a 5-day observation period after each immunization. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers were determined at baseline and 4 weeks after the single-dose and the two-dose immunizations, respectively. Immunogenicity was assessed according to the criteria of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA). Both vaccines induced comparable HI antibody titers. Seroconversion (> or =4-fold rise in HI antibody titers, reaching a titer of > or =1:40) was achieved in 41 to 100% of the participants. Seroprotection (HI titer, > or =1:40) and a >2.5-fold increase in geometric mean titers were achieved in 100% of the participants. Thus, all three EMEA requirements for influenza vaccine efficacy were met by all treatment groups and for both vaccines. The virosome vaccine, when administered as a single dose, seemed to induce superior immunogenicity compared with the standard pediatric two-dose regimen. Totals of 42 and 57% of vaccinees receiving virosome and subunit vaccines, respectively, reported at least one local AE (predominantly pain). Totals of 84 and 71% of subjects receiving virosome and subunit vaccines, respectively, complained in response to questions of at least one systemic AE (mainly cough, fatigue, coryza, or headache). The majority of events were mild or moderate and lasted 1 or 2 days only. No obvious relationship was found between AE reporting rate and vaccine formulation, age group, or dose regimen. The relatively high AE reporting rate seemed to be partly related to the symptomatology of the underlying CF disease. In summary, the virosome and subunit vaccines induced in both age groups and against all three influenza strains an efficient immune response and were well tolerated by the children and adolescents with CF.
本研究的目的是比较三价病毒体流感疫苗(Inflexal Berna V)单剂量方案和两剂量方案与三价亚单位流感疫苗(Influvac)在囊性纤维化(CF)儿童和青少年中的免疫原性和安全性。在一项开放、随机、多中心的平行组研究中,11名CF幼儿(1至6岁)和53名CF大龄儿童及青少年(>6岁)被随机分配至以下免疫方案之一:在研究第0天接种0.5 ml病毒体疫苗,或在第0天和第28天各接种0.25 ml病毒体疫苗,或亚单位疫苗标准方案,即大龄儿童在第0天接种0.5 ml,幼儿在第0天和第28天各接种0.25 ml。每次免疫后进行为期5天的安全性评估,即记录全身和局部不良事件(AE)及生命体征。分别在基线以及单剂量和两剂量免疫后4周测定血凝抑制(HI)效价。根据欧洲药品评估局(EMEA)的标准评估免疫原性。两种疫苗诱导的HI抗体效价相当。41%至100%的参与者实现了血清转化(HI抗体效价升高≥4倍,达到≥1:40的效价)。100%的参与者实现了血清保护(HI效价≥1:40)且几何平均效价增加>2.5倍。因此,所有治疗组及两种疫苗均满足了EMEA对流感疫苗效力的所有三项要求。与标准儿科两剂量方案相比,病毒体疫苗单剂量接种时似乎诱导了更强的免疫原性。分别有42%和57%接受病毒体疫苗和亚单位疫苗的接种者报告至少出现一种局部AE(主要为疼痛)。分别有84%和71%接受病毒体疫苗和亚单位疫苗的受试者在回答问题时主诉至少出现一种全身AE(主要为咳嗽、疲劳、鼻炎或头痛)。大多数事件为轻度或中度,仅持续1或2天。未发现AE报告率与疫苗剂型、年龄组或剂量方案之间存在明显关联。相对较高的AE报告率似乎部分与潜在CF疾病的症状学有关。总之,病毒体疫苗和亚单位疫苗在两个年龄组中针对所有三种流感毒株均诱导了有效的免疫反应,且CF儿童和青少年对其耐受性良好。