Peeling R W, Wang S P, Grayston J T, Blasi F, Boman J, Clad A, Freidank H, Gaydos C A, Gnarpe J, Hagiwara T, Jones R B, Orfila J, Persson K, Puolakkainen M, Saikku P, Schachter J
Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2.
J Infect Dis. 2000 Jun;181 Suppl 3:S426-9. doi: 10.1086/315603.
The lack of standardization in chlamydia serology has made interpretation of published data difficult. This study was initiated to determine the extent of interlaboratory variation of microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test results for the serodiagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae infections. Identical panels of 22 sera were sent to 14 laboratories in eight countries for the determination of IgG and IgM antibodies by MIF. Although there was extensive variation in the numeric titer values, the overall percentage agreement with the reference standard titers from the University of Washington was 80%. For results by serodiagnostic category, the best agreement was for four-fold rise in IgG titers, while the lowest agreement was for negative or low IgG titers. Agreement for IgM titers was 50%-95%. Four laboratories failed to discern false-positive IgM titers possibly because of the presence of rheumatoid factor. Further studies are underway to determine the source of interlaboratory variation for the MIF test.
衣原体血清学缺乏标准化使得已发表数据的解读变得困难。开展这项研究是为了确定肺炎衣原体感染血清诊断中微量免疫荧光(MIF)检测结果的实验室间变异程度。将相同的22份血清样本送往八个国家的14个实验室,通过MIF检测来测定IgG和IgM抗体。尽管数值滴度值存在广泛差异,但与华盛顿大学参考标准滴度的总体百分比一致性为80%。就血清诊断类别结果而言,IgG滴度呈四倍升高的一致性最佳,而IgG滴度为阴性或低滴度时的一致性最差。IgM滴度的一致性为50% - 95%。四个实验室未能识别出可能因类风湿因子存在而导致的假阳性IgM滴度。正在进行进一步研究以确定MIF检测实验室间变异的来源。