Delnoij D, Brenner G
NIVEL, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Health Policy. 2000 Jul;52(3):157-69. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00074-9.
The rising costs of pharmaceutical expenditures are a common problem for policy makers in most European countries. In two countries, budget systems for pharmaceutical spending exist(ed). In Great Britain, between 1991 and 1999 GP fundholders were responsible for prescribing costs, and in Germany an overall expenditure cap for pharmaceutical prescribing has been used since 1993. These two examples are analysed in order to identify the conditions that are needed for successfully implementing budget systems for prescribing costs in other countries. It is argued, that a good budget system balances the provision of enough information for budget holders to monitor their expenditures on the one hand, against an explosive increase of transaction costs on the other hand. Apart from that, it makes doctors responsible only for expenditures that they themselves can actually control, and does not provide them with an incentive to use that discretionary power by shifting expenditures to other health care sectors. A good information infrastructure is needed for the implementation of budget systems in general. For the introduction of fundholding, a number of additional criteria need to be met, such as having gate-keeping GPs with personal lists and having a single-payer system.
药品支出成本的不断上升是大多数欧洲国家政策制定者面临的一个普遍问题。有两个国家存在(或曾经存在)药品支出预算系统。在英国,1991年至1999年期间,全科医生基金持有者负责开药成本,而在德国,自1993年以来一直采用药品处方总体支出上限。对这两个例子进行分析,以便确定在其他国家成功实施开药成本预算系统所需的条件。有人认为,一个好的预算系统一方面要为预算持有者提供足够的信息以监控其支出,另一方面要防止交易成本激增。除此之外,它只让医生对他们实际能够控制的支出负责,并且不给他们通过将支出转移到其他医疗保健部门来使用这种自由裁量权的激励。一般来说,实施预算系统需要良好的信息基础设施。对于引入基金持有制,还需要满足一些额外的标准,比如要有持有个人名单的守门全科医生以及单一支付者系统。