• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引入其他国家的预算系统:我们能从德国药品预算和英国全科医生基金持有制中学到什么?

Importing budget systems from other countries: what can we learn from the German drug budget and the British GP fundholding?

作者信息

Delnoij D, Brenner G

机构信息

NIVEL, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2000 Jul;52(3):157-69. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00074-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00074-9
PMID:10862991
Abstract

The rising costs of pharmaceutical expenditures are a common problem for policy makers in most European countries. In two countries, budget systems for pharmaceutical spending exist(ed). In Great Britain, between 1991 and 1999 GP fundholders were responsible for prescribing costs, and in Germany an overall expenditure cap for pharmaceutical prescribing has been used since 1993. These two examples are analysed in order to identify the conditions that are needed for successfully implementing budget systems for prescribing costs in other countries. It is argued, that a good budget system balances the provision of enough information for budget holders to monitor their expenditures on the one hand, against an explosive increase of transaction costs on the other hand. Apart from that, it makes doctors responsible only for expenditures that they themselves can actually control, and does not provide them with an incentive to use that discretionary power by shifting expenditures to other health care sectors. A good information infrastructure is needed for the implementation of budget systems in general. For the introduction of fundholding, a number of additional criteria need to be met, such as having gate-keeping GPs with personal lists and having a single-payer system.

摘要

药品支出成本的不断上升是大多数欧洲国家政策制定者面临的一个普遍问题。有两个国家存在(或曾经存在)药品支出预算系统。在英国,1991年至1999年期间,全科医生基金持有者负责开药成本,而在德国,自1993年以来一直采用药品处方总体支出上限。对这两个例子进行分析,以便确定在其他国家成功实施开药成本预算系统所需的条件。有人认为,一个好的预算系统一方面要为预算持有者提供足够的信息以监控其支出,另一方面要防止交易成本激增。除此之外,它只让医生对他们实际能够控制的支出负责,并且不给他们通过将支出转移到其他医疗保健部门来使用这种自由裁量权的激励。一般来说,实施预算系统需要良好的信息基础设施。对于引入基金持有制,还需要满足一些额外的标准,比如要有持有个人名单的守门全科医生以及单一支付者系统。

相似文献

1
Importing budget systems from other countries: what can we learn from the German drug budget and the British GP fundholding?引入其他国家的预算系统:我们能从德国药品预算和英国全科医生基金持有制中学到什么?
Health Policy. 2000 Jul;52(3):157-69. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00074-9.
2
General practice fundholders' prescribing savings in one region of the United Kingdom, 1991-1994.1991 - 1994年英国某地区全科医疗基金持有者的处方费用节省情况
Health Policy. 1997 Oct;42(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00040-7.
3
The effect of fundholding on prescribing and referral costs: a review of the evidence.基金持有对处方和转诊费用的影响:证据综述。
Health Policy. 1997 May;40(2):103-14. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(96)00888-3.
4
GP fundholding and the costs of prescribing: further results.全科医生基金持有制与处方成本:进一步结果
J Public Health Med. 1997 Mar;19(1):18-22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024580.
5
Prescribing. Saving graces.
Health Serv J. 1997 Nov 6;107(5578):24-5.
6
Effect of fundholding and indicative prescribing schemes on general practitioners' prescribing costs.基金持有和指导性处方计划对全科医生处方成本的影响。
BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1186-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1186.
7
Fundholders' prescribing costs: the first five years.基金持有人的处方成本:头五年
BMJ. 1996 Dec 14;313(7071):1531-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7071.1531.
8
Controversies in primary care. Setting prescribing budgets in general practice. Capitation based prescribing budgets will not work.基层医疗中的争议。在全科医疗中设定处方预算。基于人头数的处方预算行不通。
BMJ. 1998 Mar 7;316(7133):748-50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7133.748.
9
The drug budget silo mentality: the French case.药品预算的孤立思维:以法国为例。
Value Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;6 Suppl 1:S10-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.6.s1.2.x.
10
Transferring the costs of expensive treatments from secondary to primary care.将昂贵治疗的费用从二级医疗转移至初级医疗。
BMJ. 1995 Feb 25;310(6978):509-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6978.509.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating shared savings programs into primary care: from theory to practice.将共享储蓄计划纳入初级保健:从理论到实践。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 30;15:580. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1250-0.
2
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.药品政策:针对开处方者的经济激励措施的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 4;2015(8):CD006731. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006731.pub2.
3
Bismarck or Beveridge: a beauty contest between dinosaurs.俾斯麦还是贝弗里奇:恐龙之间的选美比赛。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun 26;7:94. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-94.
4
Impacts of cost containment strategies on pharmaceutical expenditures of the National Health Insurance in Taiwan, 1996-2003.成本控制策略对1996 - 2003年台湾地区国民健康保险药品支出的影响
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(9):891-902. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624090-00006.
5
European healthcare policies for controlling drug expenditure.欧洲控制药品支出的医疗政策。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(2):89-103. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321020-00002.