Wechsler B, Schaub J, Friedli K, Hauser R
Swiss Federal Veterinary Office, Centre for Proper Housing of Ruminants and Pigs, Swiss Federal Research Station for Agricultural Economics and Engineering, CH-8356, Tänikon, Switzerland
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000 Oct 1;69(3):189-197. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00134-9.
In order to reduce straw input, soft lying mats are used increasingly instead of straw bedding in cubicle systems for dairy cows. This study aimed at comparing different types of soft lying mats with straw bedding regarding cow behaviour and leg injuries. Data were collected on five farms with straw bedding and on 13 farms using four types of soft lying mats consisting of different materials. On each farm, lying behaviour of 10 cows was recorded automatically during 3 days by means of a pneumatically operated resting sensor fitted in a belt. In addition, standing up and lying down behaviour of cows was quantified by direct observations, and all cows on a given farm were checked once for leg injuries.There were no significant differences between cows kept in cubicle systems with soft lying mats and straw bedding regarding the total time spent lying per day and the number of lying bouts per day. Standing up and lying down behaviour also did not differ between cows with access to soft lying mats and straw bedding. Leg injuries were most frequent in the tarsal and carpal joints. Cows kept in cubicle systems with soft lying mats had a significantly higher incidence of both hairless patches more than 2 cm in diameter (P<0.001) and scabs or wounds less than 2 cm in diameter (P<0.001) located in the tarsal joints than cows in cubicle systems with straw bedding. With the carpal joints, on the other hand, the incidence of leg injuries did not differ significantly between these two housing conditions. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that soft lying mats are equivalent to straw bedding in terms of cow behaviour but less favourable with respect to leg injuries located in the tarsal joints.
为了减少秸秆投入,在奶牛的单间饲养系统中,越来越多地使用柔软的卧垫来代替秸秆垫料。本研究旨在比较不同类型的柔软卧垫和秸秆垫料对奶牛行为及腿部损伤的影响。在5个使用秸秆垫料的农场和13个使用由不同材料制成的4种类型柔软卧垫的农场收集了数据。在每个农场,通过安装在牛带中的气动休息传感器,自动记录10头牛3天的躺卧行为。此外,通过直接观察对奶牛的站立和躺卧行为进行量化,并对给定农场的所有奶牛检查一次腿部损伤情况。在使用柔软卧垫和秸秆垫料的单间饲养系统中,奶牛每天总的躺卧时间和每天的躺卧次数没有显著差异。能够使用柔软卧垫和秸秆垫料的奶牛在站立和躺卧行为上也没有差异。跗关节和腕关节的腿部损伤最为常见。与使用秸秆垫料的单间饲养系统中的奶牛相比,使用柔软卧垫的单间饲养系统中的奶牛跗关节处直径超过2厘米的无毛斑块(P<0.001)和直径小于2厘米的结痂或伤口(P<0.001)的发生率显著更高。另一方面,在这两种饲养条件下,腕关节处的腿部损伤发生率没有显著差异。总之,本研究结果表明,就奶牛行为而言,柔软卧垫与秸秆垫料相当,但在跗关节的腿部损伤方面则不太有利。