Wilson M J, Hall V, Brazier J, Lewis M A O
Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology and *PHLS Anaerobe Reference Unit, Department of Medical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN.
J Med Microbiol. 2000 Aug;49(8):747-751. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-49-8-747.
Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC) are isolated from approximately one quarter of all infections involving anaerobic bacteria. However, studies of the significance of this group of pathogens have been hindered by an inadequate taxonomy and the lack of a valid identification scheme. In the present study, a phenotypic scheme for the identification of 'butyrate-producing' GPAC based on the analysis of volatile fatty acid profiles by gas-liquid chromatography, biochemical profiles (including the use of the rapid ID 32 A commercial kit) and carbohydrate fermentation reactions, was evaluated. The identity of 68 clinical isolates of GPAC was determined by application of the scheme published by Murdoch. The scheme was found to be easy to apply and only four of the test isolates could not be readily assigned to a species or well-defined group. The species most frequently identified in the test collection were Peptostreptoccoccus vaginalis, P. tetradius and the betaGAL group. A large number of strains was assigned to the heterogeneous 'prevotii/tetradius' group. Some species regarded as being restricted to particular clinical sites were shown to be more widespread than previously thought. The clinical source of the isolates did not show any consistent correlation with species identity.
革兰氏阳性厌氧球菌(GPAC)约占所有厌氧菌感染的四分之一。然而,由于分类学不完善以及缺乏有效的鉴定方法,对这类病原体重要性的研究受到了阻碍。在本研究中,评估了一种基于气液色谱分析挥发性脂肪酸谱、生化谱(包括使用快速ID 32 A商业试剂盒)和碳水化合物发酵反应来鉴定“产丁酸”GPAC的表型方法。通过应用默多克公布的方法确定了68株GPAC临床分离株的身份。该方法易于应用,仅4株测试分离株不能轻易归类到某个物种或明确的菌群。测试样本中最常鉴定出的物种是阴道消化链球菌、四联消化链球菌和β-半乳糖苷酶组。大量菌株被归类到异质性的“普氏/四联”组。一些被认为局限于特定临床部位的物种比以前认为的分布更广。分离株的临床来源与物种身份之间未显示出任何一致的相关性。