Bruck M, Ceci S J, Francoeur E
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-3325, USA.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2000 Mar;6(1):74-83. doi: 10.1037//1076-898x.6.1.74.
The influence of anatomically detailed dolls on 3- and 4-year-old children's reports of a routine medical exam was examined. During the exam, half the children received a genital examination and half the children did not. Immediately after the exam, all children were asked to demonstrate various events on an anatomically detailed doll and on their own bodies. Although there were age differences in the number of accurate demonstrations of how the doctor used different instruments, there were no age differences on measures that assessed reports of genital touching. Among girls, commission errors were more frequent when dolls were used because some children falsely showed insertions into the anal or genital cavity. The authors conclude that dolls should not be used in interviews with children below the age of 5 years.
研究了具有解剖细节的玩偶对3至4岁儿童关于常规医学检查报告的影响。在检查过程中,一半儿童接受了生殖器检查,另一半儿童未接受。检查结束后,立即要求所有儿童在具有解剖细节的玩偶和自己身体上演示各种检查过程。尽管在医生使用不同器械的准确演示数量上存在年龄差异,但在评估生殖器触摸报告的指标上不存在年龄差异。在女孩中,使用玩偶时错误报告的情况更频繁,因为一些儿童错误地展示了将物体插入肛门或生殖器腔的动作。作者得出结论,5岁以下儿童的访谈中不应使用玩偶。