Suppr超能文献

范例生成与类别验证中的分散注意力、衰老及启动效应

Divided attention, aging, and priming in exemplar generation and category verification.

作者信息

Light L L, Prull M W, Kennison R F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Pitzer College, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2000 Jul;28(5):856-72. doi: 10.3758/bf03198421.

Abstract

Transfer-appropriate processing theories differentiate between conceptual- and perceptual-priming tasks. The former are said to be influenced by the nature of processing engaged in at study, but not by changes in modality between study and test; the latter are sensitive to changes in format between study and test, but not to variations in the extent of semantic processing at study. In the present experiments, we examined the effects of divided attention and aging on priming in exemplar generation and category verification, two tasks that require access to semantic information at test. Manipulations of attention during encoding affected the extent of priming in exemplar generation, but not in category verification. Priming effects were similar in young and older adults in exemplar generation following study in both full and divided attention. Although older adults did not demonstrate priming in category verification in one experiment, no effects of age or divided attention were observed in a second experiment. In addition, priming in category verification was unaffected by varying the level of processing at encoding. However, the absence of levels-of-processing and attention effects in category verification does not signal that priming in this task has a perceptual basis; priming in category verification was insensitive to modality shifts between study and test. The implications of these findings for theories of priming and cognitive aging are considered.

摘要

迁移适当加工理论区分了概念启动任务和知觉启动任务。前者据说受学习时所进行加工的性质影响,但不受学习与测试之间模态变化的影响;后者对学习与测试之间的形式变化敏感,但对学习时语义加工程度的变化不敏感。在本实验中,我们考察了分心和衰老对样例生成和类别验证中启动的影响,这两项任务在测试时都需要获取语义信息。编码过程中的注意力操作影响了样例生成中的启动程度,但不影响类别验证中的启动程度。在全神贯注和分心学习后的样例生成中,年轻人和老年人的启动效应相似。虽然在一项实验中老年人在类别验证中未表现出启动效应,但在第二项实验中未观察到年龄或分心的影响。此外,类别验证中的启动不受编码时加工水平变化的影响。然而,类别验证中不存在加工水平和注意力效应并不表明该任务中的启动具有知觉基础;类别验证中的启动对学习与测试之间的模态转换不敏感。我们考虑了这些发现对启动理论和认知衰老的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验