• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊柱肿瘤研究学会结局问卷的心理计量学评价和适应性:评估脊柱转移瘤患者的健康相关生活质量。

Psychometric evaluation and adaptation of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire to evaluate health-related quality of life in patients with spinal metastases.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1828-1838. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31240. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.31240
PMID:29409108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5900572/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ) was developed as the first spine oncology-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure. This study evaluated the psychometric properties and clinical validity of the SOSGOQ in a diverse cohort of patients with spinal metastases.

METHODS

An international, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study including patients with spinal metastases who underwent surgery and/or radiotherapy was conducted by the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor. Demographic, tumor, and treatment data were collected. HRQOL was evaluated using the SOSGOQ and Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) at baseline and fixed follow-up times. Construct validity was assessed using multitrait scaling analyses, confirmatory factor analyses, and correlation with the SF-36 and NRS pain score. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a subgroup of patients between 12 weeks after treatment and the retest 4 to 9 days later.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients were enrolled at 9 centers across North America; 153 of these patients had HRQOL data available at 12 weeks after treatment. Multitrait scaling analyses and confirmatory factor analyses resulted in a refined version of the SOSGOQ with 4 domains and 4 single items. The revised SOSGOQ (SOSGOQ2.0) demonstrated strong correlations with SF-36 and the ability to discriminate between clinically distinct patient groups. Reliability of the SOSGOQ2.0 was demonstrated to be good, with an intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.58 to 0.92 for the different domains.

CONCLUSIONS

The SOSGOQ2.0 is a reliable and valid measure with which to evaluate HRQOL in patients with spinal metastases. It is recommended to use the SOSGOQ2.0 together with a generic HRQOL outcome measure to comprehensively assess HRQOL and increase sensitivity and specificity. Cancer 2018;124:1828-38. © 2018 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

摘要

背景

脊柱肿瘤研究组结局问卷(SOSGOQ)是作为首个脊柱肿瘤专用健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)量表而开发的。本研究在接受手术和/或放疗的脊柱转移瘤患者的多元化队列中评估了 SOSGOQ 的心理测量学特性和临床有效性。

方法

由 AOSpine 知识论坛肿瘤开展了一项国际性、多中心、前瞻性观察队列研究,纳入了接受手术和/或放疗的脊柱转移瘤患者。收集了人口统计学、肿瘤和治疗数据。在基线和固定随访时间使用 SOSGOQ 和医疗结局研究短式 36 健康调查(SF-36)评估 HRQOL。使用多特质标度分析、验证性因子分析以及与 SF-36 和 NRS 疼痛评分的相关性评估结构效度。在治疗后 12 周和随后 4 至 9 天进行复测的患者亚组中评估测试-重测信度。

结果

共 238 例患者纳入北美 9 家中心,其中 153 例患者在治疗后 12 周时具有 HRQOL 数据。多特质标度分析和验证性因子分析产生了具有 4 个领域和 4 个单项的改良版 SOSGOQ。修订后的 SOSGOQ(SOSGOQ2.0)与 SF-36 相关性强,并能够区分具有临床意义的不同患者群体。SOSGOQ2.0 的可靠性良好,不同领域的组内相关系数为 0.58 至 0.92。

结论

SOSGOQ2.0 是一种可靠和有效的量表,可用于评估脊柱转移瘤患者的 HRQOL。建议将 SOSGOQ2.0 与通用的 HRQOL 结局测量指标一起使用,以全面评估 HRQOL 并提高敏感性和特异性。癌症 2018;124:1828-38。© 2018 美国癌症协会。Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 是此文章的出版者,并对此文享有所有版权。这是在创作共用署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎 4.0 国际许可协议下授权的,允许在任何媒体上以任何形式使用、分发,只要注明原始作者和来源,并不能用于商业目的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e22/5900572/8ef3c39fb1cf/CNCR-124-1828-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e22/5900572/6ea9ecd87386/CNCR-124-1828-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e22/5900572/8ef3c39fb1cf/CNCR-124-1828-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e22/5900572/6ea9ecd87386/CNCR-124-1828-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e22/5900572/8ef3c39fb1cf/CNCR-124-1828-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation and adaptation of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire to evaluate health-related quality of life in patients with spinal metastases.脊柱肿瘤研究学会结局问卷的心理计量学评价和适应性:评估脊柱转移瘤患者的健康相关生活质量。
Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1828-1838. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31240. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
2
Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2.0 to assess Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Metastasis.泰文版脊柱肿瘤研究学会结局问卷 2.0 用于评估脊柱转移瘤患者生活质量的有效性和可靠性。
Spine J. 2021 Nov;21(11):1920-1924. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 16.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ) 2.0 with its assessment in clinical setting.脊柱肿瘤研究学会结局问卷(SOSGOQ)2.0 简体中文版的跨文化调适及验证,并在临床环境中进行评估。
Spine J. 2022 Dec;22(12):2024-2032. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.013. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Russian version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0).俄文版脊柱肿瘤研究学会结局问卷(SOSGOQ2.0)的跨文化调适、信度和效度。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jul 7;39(4):568-575. doi: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23403. Print 2023 Oct 1.
5
eCross-cultural adaptation of the spine oncology-specific SOSGOQ2.0 questionnaire to German language and the assessment of its validity and reliability in the clinical setting.脊柱肿瘤学特异性 SOSGOQ2.0 问卷的跨文化适应至德语版,以及其在临床环境中的有效性和可靠性评估。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 23;21(1):1044. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08578-x.
6
Translation and validation of the Dutch Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0) to evaluate health-related quality of life in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases.荷兰脊柱肿瘤研究学会结局问卷(SOSGOQ2.0)的翻译及验证:用于评估有症状脊柱转移患者的健康相关生活质量。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Nov 23;23(1):1009. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05837-1.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire.《脊柱肿瘤研究组结局问卷》中文版的跨文化调适与验证
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;12:1016258. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1016258. eCollection 2022.
8
Introducing a new health-related quality of life outcome tool for metastatic disease of the spine: content validation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health; on behalf of the Spine Oncology Study Group.引入一种新的与健康相关的脊柱转移瘤生活质量结局评估工具:使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类进行内容验证;代表脊柱肿瘤研究组。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jun 15;35(14):1377-86. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181db96a5.
9
Association of neurologic deficits with surgical outcomes and health-related quality of life after treatment for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.治疗转移性硬膜外脊髓压迫症后神经功能缺损与手术结果及健康相关生活质量的关系。
Cancer. 2019 Dec 1;125(23):4224-4231. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32420. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
10
Assessment of quality of life after surgery for spinal metastases: position statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group.脊柱转移瘤手术后生活质量评估:全球脊柱肿瘤研究组立场声明。
World Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;80(6):e175-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.054. Epub 2013 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Hungarian version of the spine oncology study group outcomes questionnaire.匈牙利版脊柱肿瘤学研究组结局问卷的效度、信度和反应度
Eur Spine J. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09255-4.
2
The Spinal Chordoma Patient Reported Outcome Survey (spCPROS): a patient-centered, disease-specific tool for assessing quality of life in spinal chordoma patients.脊髓脊索瘤患者报告结局调查(spCPROS):一种以患者为中心、针对特定疾病的工具,用于评估脊髓脊索瘤患者的生活质量。
J Neurooncol. 2025 Nov;175(2):813-824. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-05181-z. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
3
Practice variations in indication, timing and outcome of Multiple Myeloma patients undergoing surgery for vertebral lesions - results from the European M2Spine study group.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Spine Oncology Study Group-Outcomes Questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with metastatic spine disease.脊柱肿瘤学研究组结局问卷用于评估转移性脊柱疾病患者生活质量的效度验证。
Spine J. 2017 Jun;17(6):768-776. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.456. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
2
40-year trends in an index of survival for all cancers combined and survival adjusted for age and sex for each cancer in England and Wales, 1971-2011: a population-based study.英格兰和威尔士 1971-2011 年所有癌症综合生存率及各癌龄性调整生存率指数 40 年变化趋势:基于人群的研究。
Lancet. 2015 Mar 28;385(9974):1206-18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61396-9. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
3
多发性骨髓瘤患者因椎体病变接受手术的指征、时机及结果的实践差异——来自欧洲M2脊柱研究组的结果
J Neurooncol. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-05085-y.
4
The AO Spine Knowledge Forums: A Decade of Impactful Spine Research.AO 脊柱知识论坛:十年有影响力的脊柱研究
Global Spine J. 2025 Jun 8:21925682251343521. doi: 10.1177/21925682251343521.
5
Evaluation of Adverse Events and the Impact on Health-Related Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Metastatic Spine Tumors: Analysis of the Metastatic Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (MTRON) Registry Dataset.转移性脊柱肿瘤手术患者不良事件评估及其对健康相关结局的影响:转移性肿瘤研究与结局网络(MTRON)注册数据集分析
Global Spine J. 2025 Jun 6:21925682251347247. doi: 10.1177/21925682251347247.
6
Advancing Metastatic Spine Tumor Research: A Review of AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor's Scientific Contributions Derived From the EPOSO Network, 2014-2024.推进转移性脊柱肿瘤研究:对AO脊柱知识论坛肿瘤学2014 - 2024年源自EPOSO网络的科学贡献的综述
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar 12:21925682251326515. doi: 10.1177/21925682251326515.
7
Surgical Adverse Events for Primary Tumors of the Spine and Their Impact on Outcomes: An Observational Study From the Primary Tumors Research and Outcomes Network.脊柱原发性肿瘤的手术不良事件及其对预后的影响:来自原发性肿瘤研究与预后网络的一项观察性研究
Neurosurgery. 2025 Feb 5;97(1):264-276. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003369.
8
Outcome prediction, quality of life, and life expectancy in metastatic spine tumors: WFNS spine committee recommendation.转移性脊柱肿瘤的预后预测、生活质量及预期寿命:世界神经外科联合会脊柱委员会建议
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Feb 3;48(1):160. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03298-3.
9
Frontline Voice: AO Spine Member Survey Regarding Spine Oncology Knowledge Generation and Translation Needs.一线之声:AO 脊柱会员关于脊柱肿瘤学知识生成与转化需求的调查
Global Spine J. 2025 Jun;15(5):2754-2766. doi: 10.1177/21925682251314497. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
10
Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes of Surgically Treated Patients With Symptomatic Spinal Metastases: Results From Epidemiology, Process, and Outcomes of Spine Oncology (EPOSO), a Prospective, Multi-Institutional and International Study.有症状脊柱转移瘤手术治疗患者的患者报告结局和临床结局:来自脊柱肿瘤学的流行病学、过程和结局(EPOSO)研究的结果,一项前瞻性、多机构和国际性研究
Neurosurgery. 2024 Nov 1;95(5):1148-1157. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002989. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review.
在姑息治疗癌症患者的仪器验证研究中,测试重测可靠性的批判性分析:系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jan 21;14:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-8.
4
International field testing of the reliability and validity of the EORTC QLQ-BM22 module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with bone metastases.EORTC QLQ-BM22 模块评估骨转移患者健康相关生活质量的可靠性和有效性的国际现场测试。
Cancer. 2012 Mar 1;118(5):1457-65. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26410. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
5
Fatigue, depression, sleep, and activity during chemotherapy: daily and intraday variation and relationships among symptom changes.化疗期间的疲劳、抑郁、睡眠和活动:每日和日内变化以及症状变化之间的关系。
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Dec;42(3):321-33. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9294-9.
6
Introducing a new health-related quality of life outcome tool for metastatic disease of the spine: content validation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health; on behalf of the Spine Oncology Study Group.引入一种新的与健康相关的脊柱转移瘤生活质量结局评估工具:使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类进行内容验证;代表脊柱肿瘤研究组。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jun 15;35(14):1377-86. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181db96a5.
7
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.组内相关系数:在评估评分者可靠性中的应用。
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
8
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.针对健康状况调查问卷的测量属性提出了质量标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
9
The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.医学结局研究36项简明健康调查(SF - 36):III. 不同患者群体的数据质量、量表假设及信度测试
Med Care. 1994 Jan;32(1):40-66. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004.
10
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.结构模型中的比较拟合指数。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.