Herdman M
Instituto de Salud Pública de Cataluña, Universidad de Barcelona.
Med Clin (Barc). 2000;114 Suppl 3:22-5.
The measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) plays a very important role in the study of health outcomes, particularly in effectiveness studies. Nevertheless, the nature of these studies implies a series of challenges in the use of HRQOL instruments, due to the type of comparisons made, the heterogeneity of subjects included in terms of both the presence of comorbid conditions and the ability to understand and complete questionnaires, and because there is a need to collect the data in conditions of usual clinical practice. The aim of this paper is to discuss some of these issues, as well as other topics of current interest in the field, such as the use of individualized measures, applications of Item Response Theory, and response shift phenomenon research. With regard to the use of HRQOL measures in effectiveness studies, the main conclusions are that: a) instrument selection probably needs to be even more careful than in controlled clinical trials, and needs to take into account time pressures and variability in patients' ability to respond; b) that instrument selection should centre on the use of disease-specific measures; c) that generic measures may play an important role in capturing the broader effects of co-morbidity, and may be useful in controlling certain types of bias, and d) that more comparisons are required between disease-specific instruments for the same condition, particularly with respect to their discriminative power and their sensitivity to change.
健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的测量在健康结果研究中起着非常重要的作用,尤其是在有效性研究中。然而,由于所进行比较的类型、纳入研究对象在合并症存在情况以及理解和完成问卷能力方面的异质性,以及需要在常规临床实践条件下收集数据,这些研究的性质意味着在使用HRQOL工具时存在一系列挑战。本文旨在讨论其中一些问题,以及该领域当前感兴趣的其他主题,如个性化测量的使用、项目反应理论的应用和反应转移现象研究。关于在有效性研究中使用HRQOL测量,主要结论如下:a)工具选择可能比在对照临床试验中更需谨慎,且需要考虑时间压力和患者反应能力的变异性;b)工具选择应以使用疾病特异性测量为中心;c)通用测量在捕捉合并症的更广泛影响方面可能发挥重要作用,且可能有助于控制某些类型的偏差;d)对于相同疾病,需要在疾病特异性工具之间进行更多比较,特别是在它们的鉴别力和对变化的敏感性方面。