• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者分析:综述

Stakeholder analysis: a review.

作者信息

Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2000 Sep;15(3):239-46. doi: 10.1093/heapol/15.3.239.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/15.3.239
PMID:11012397
Abstract

The growing popularity of stakeholder analysis reflects an increasing recognition of how the characteristics of stakeholders--individuals, groups and organizations--influence decision-making processes. This paper reviews the origins and uses of stakeholder analysis, as described in the policy, health care management and development literature. Its roots are in the political and policy sciences, and in management theory where it has evolved into a systematic tool with clearly defined steps and applications for scanning the current and future organizational environment. Stakeholder analysis can be used to generate knowledge about the relevant actors so as to understand their behaviour, intentions, interrelations, agendas, interests, and the influence or resources they have brought--or could bring--to bear on decision-making processes. This information can then be used to develop strategies for managing these stakeholders, to facilitate the implementation of specific decisions or organizational objectives, or to understand the policy context and assess the feasibility of future policy directions. Policy development is a complex process which frequently takes place in an unstable and rapidly changing context, subject to unpredictable internal and external factors. As a cross-sectional view of an evolving picture, the utility of stakeholder analysis for predicting and managing the future is time-limited and it should be complemented by other policy analysis approaches.

摘要

利益相关者分析日益受到欢迎,这反映出人们越来越认识到利益相关者(个人、团体和组织)的特征如何影响决策过程。本文回顾了政策、医疗保健管理和发展文献中所描述的利益相关者分析的起源和用途。其根源在于政治和政策科学以及管理理论,在管理理论中它已发展成为一种具有明确步骤和应用的系统工具,用于审视当前和未来的组织环境。利益相关者分析可用于生成有关相关行为者的知识,以便了解他们的行为、意图、相互关系、议程、利益以及他们已经——或可能——对决策过程施加影响的影响力或资源。然后,这些信息可用于制定管理这些利益相关者的策略,以促进具体决策或组织目标的实施,或了解政策背景并评估未来政策方向的可行性。政策制定是一个复杂的过程,经常在不稳定且迅速变化的背景下进行,受到不可预测的内部和外部因素的影响。作为对不断变化情况的横断面观察,利益相关者分析在预测和管理未来方面的效用是有限的,应该用其他政策分析方法加以补充。

相似文献

1
Stakeholder analysis: a review.利益相关者分析:综述
Health Policy Plan. 2000 Sep;15(3):239-46. doi: 10.1093/heapol/15.3.239.
2
A stakeholder analysis.利益相关者分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2000 Sep;15(3):338-45. doi: 10.1093/heapol/15.3.338.
3
Stakeholder management in a hyperturbulent health care environment.超动荡医疗环境中的利益相关者管理
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2000 Dec;19(2):1-7. doi: 10.1097/00126450-200019020-00002.
4
Stakeholder analysis in worksite health promotion programming.工作场所健康促进规划中的利益相关者分析。
Am J Health Promot. 2011 May-Jun;25(5):TAHP1-11. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.25.5.tahp.
5
A perspective on the analysis of credible commitment and myopia in health sector decision making.关于卫生部门决策中可信承诺与短视分析的一种观点。
Health Policy. 2003 Mar;63(3):269-78. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00119-7.
6
Stakeholder influence in public sector information systems strategy implementation-The case of public hospitals in South Africa.利益相关者对公共部门信息系统战略实施的影响——以南非公立医院为例。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jan;109:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
7
Stakeholder analysis for industrial waste management systems.工业废物管理系统的利益相关者分析
Waste Manag. 2009 Feb;29(2):965-73. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.013. Epub 2008 Sep 14.
8
Towards an explanatory framework for national level maternal health policy agenda item evolution in Ghana: an embedded case study.为加纳国家层面母婴健康政策议程项目演变构建解释框架:一项嵌入式案例研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Aug 3;16(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0354-5.
9
Health sector development: from aid coordination to resource management.卫生部门发展:从援助协调到资源管理。
Health Policy Plan. 1999 Sep;14(3):207-18. doi: 10.1093/heapol/14.3.207.
10
Stakeholder management for conservation projects: a case study of Ream National Park, Cambodia.保护项目的利益相关者管理:以柬埔寨贡布国家公园为例
Environ Manage. 2001 Jul;28(1):47-60. doi: 10.1007/s002670010206.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives of physical activity in combating metabolic syndrome: insights from a multi-ethnic urban population.身体活动在对抗代谢综合征中的作用:来自多民族城市人群的见解
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 22;13:1477025. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1477025. eCollection 2025.
2
Actor-network and stakeholder analysis in preventing health goods smuggling in Iran.伊朗预防卫生用品走私中的行动者网络与利益相关者分析
Global Health. 2025 Sep 1;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01147-y.
3
The role of representation in participatory settings of health research in Germany: protocol for a scoping review.
代表性在德国健康研究参与式环境中的作用:一项范围综述方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 3;11(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00736-w.
4
Sailing global health initiative ships into stormy seas: navigating the introduction of the Global Financing Facility in Mozambique.将全球卫生倡议之船驶入波涛汹涌的海域:莫桑比克引入全球融资机制的应对之策
Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2518651. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2518651. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
5
Responsible research impact: Ethics for making a difference.负责任的研究影响:创造改变的伦理准则。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Mar 31;5:92. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19649.1. eCollection 2025.
6
Stakeholder engagement champions: a locally-driven model for building impactful and sustainable relationships in global health research.利益相关者参与倡导者:一种在全球卫生研究中建立有影响力和可持续关系的地方驱动模式。
J Glob Health. 2025 Jun 6;15:03026. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.03026.
7
'Mind the gaps': stakeholder perspectives on addressing antimicrobial resistance in the environment in the Indian context.“注意差距”:印度背景下利益相关者对解决环境中抗菌药物耐药性问题的看法。
Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2491200. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2491200. Epub 2025 May 1.
8
Can bioethics bray? Non-human animals, biosemiotics, and a road to shared decision-making.生物伦理学能发出叫声吗?非人类动物、生物符号学与共同决策之路。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2025 Feb;46(1):103-120. doi: 10.1007/s11017-025-09705-6. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
9
Digital Health for Equitable Rheumatic Care: Integrating Real-World Experiences to Guide Policy Pathways.促进公平风湿性疾病护理的数字健康:整合真实世界经验以指导政策路径
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 18;13(4):438. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040438.
10
Values of Stakeholders Involved in Applying Surveillance Technology for People With Dementia in Nursing Homes: Scoping Review.养老院中痴呆症患者应用监测技术所涉及利益相关者的价值观:范围审查
JMIR Aging. 2025 Mar 20;8:e64074. doi: 10.2196/64074.