Söderlund A, Olerud C, Lindberg P
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Clin Rehabil. 2000 Oct;14(5):457-67. doi: 10.1191/0269215500cr348oa.
To compare two different home exercise programmes for patients with acute whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). A further aim was to describe the initial prognostic variables related to self-reported pain at six months follow-up.
A randomized treatment study with a follow-up period of six months.
The study was undertaken in an orthopaedic clinic at a university hospital.
A total of 59 symptomatic (neck pain, stiffness, etc.) patients with acute whiplash injury.
Patients were randomized to a regular treatment group (RT group) and an additional-exercise treatment group (AT group).
Pain Disability Index (PDI), Self-Efficacy Scale (SES), Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), neck range of motion (ROM), head posture, kinaesthetic sensibility, visual analogue scale (VAS).
Patients given an additional exercise did not improve more than patients with regular treatment. Only one CSQ item, 'Ability to decrease pain', showed a significant difference between the groups in its pattern of change over time: the AT group had a significant increase between three and six months whilst values in the RT group decreased. Nonsymptomatic patients at six months follow-up were characterized by initially better self-efficacy, lower disability and significantly different patterns in the use of 'behavioural coping strategies' when compared with symptomatic patients. The nonsymptomatic patients also reported more frequent training than symptomatic patients, i.e. they complied better with the treatment regime.
This home exercise programme, including training of neck and shoulder ROM, relaxation and general advice seems to be sufficient treatment for acute WAD patients when used on a daily basis. Additionally, patients reporting low self-efficacy and high disability levels may profit from more attention initially, as these psychological factors are significant predictors of pain at long-term follow-up.
比较两种针对急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)患者的不同家庭锻炼方案。另一个目的是描述与随访6个月时自我报告疼痛相关的初始预后变量。
一项随访期为6个月的随机治疗研究。
该研究在一家大学医院的骨科诊所进行。
共有59例有症状(颈部疼痛、僵硬等)的急性挥鞭样损伤患者。
患者被随机分为常规治疗组(RT组)和额外锻炼治疗组(AT组)。
疼痛残疾指数(PDI)、自我效能量表(SES)、应对策略问卷(CSQ)、颈部活动范围(ROM)、头部姿势、动觉敏感性、视觉模拟量表(VAS)。
接受额外锻炼的患者并不比接受常规治疗的患者改善得更多。只有CSQ中的一项“减轻疼痛的能力”在两组随时间变化的模式上显示出显著差异:AT组在3至6个月之间有显著增加,而RT组的值下降。与有症状的患者相比,随访6个月时无症状的患者最初具有更好的自我效能、更低的残疾程度,并且在使用“行为应对策略”方面有显著不同的模式。无症状患者报告的训练频率也比有症状患者更高,即他们对治疗方案的依从性更好。
这种家庭锻炼方案,包括颈部和肩部ROM训练、放松和一般建议,当每天使用时似乎是急性WAD患者的充分治疗方法。此外,报告自我效能低和残疾水平高的患者最初可能会从更多关注中受益,因为这些心理因素是长期随访中疼痛的重要预测因素。