Nestle M
Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, New York University, NY 10012, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2000 Jul-Aug;115(4):308-19. doi: 10.1093/phr/115.4.308.
Healthy People 2010 objectives call for meals and snacks served in schools to contribute to overall diets that meet federal dietary guidelines. Sales in schools of foods and drinks high in calories and low in nutrients undermine this health objective, as well as participation in the more nutritious, federally sponsored, school lunch programs. Competitive foods also undermine nutrition information taught in the classroom. Lucrative contracts between school districts and soft drink companies for exclusive rights to sell one brand are the latest development in the increasing commercialization of school food. These contracts, intended to elicit brand loyalty among young children who have a lifetime of purchases ahead of them, are especially questionable because they place schools in the position of "pushing" soft drink consumption. "Pouring rights" contracts deserve attention from public health professionals concerned about the nutritional quality of children's diets.
“健康人民2010”目标要求学校提供的餐食和零食有助于形成符合联邦饮食指南的整体饮食。学校中高热量、低营养的食品和饮料的销售破坏了这一健康目标,也影响了参与更营养的、由联邦政府资助的学校午餐计划。竞争性食品还破坏了课堂上教授的营养知识。学区与软饮料公司之间签订的、授予单一品牌独家销售权的高额利润合同,是学校食品日益商业化的最新发展。这些合同旨在培养儿童的品牌忠诚度,而他们未来还有一辈子的购买行为,这尤其值得质疑,因为它们使学校处于“推动”软饮料消费的位置。“倾倒权”合同值得关注儿童饮食营养质量的公共卫生专业人员的关注。