Sullivan K E, Cutilli J, Piliero L M, Ghavimi-Alagha D, Starr S E, Campbell D E, Douglas S D
Division of Immunologic and Infectious Diseases, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000 Nov;7(6):920-4. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.7.6.920-924.2000.
Quantitation of cytokine production is a valuable adjunct to standard immunologic assays in defining several pathologic processes. Nevertheless, there is little agreement about which tissues should be assayed, which type of assay should be performed, and which stimulation protocol should be used. As these types of assays enter the clinical arena, there is need for standardization. There is also a need to maximize the amount of information which may be derived from a single sample. We compared secreted interleukin 4 (IL-4), IL-2, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), and gamma interferon proteins as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with intracellular cytokine production (IL-2 and gamma interferon) as detected by flow cytometry and quantitative competitive PCR for IL-2, IL-4, TNF-alpha, and gamma interferon mRNA and cDNA. Results from unstimulated cells and cells stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate, phytohemagglutinin, and phorbol myristate acetate plus phytohemagglutin were compared. All three methodologies detected significant stimulation of cytokine production. The combination of phytohemagglutinin and phorbol myristate acetate was overall the most-potent stimulus.
细胞因子产生的定量分析是标准免疫分析在定义多种病理过程中的一项有价值的辅助手段。然而,对于应检测哪些组织、应进行哪种类型的检测以及应使用哪种刺激方案,几乎没有达成共识。随着这类检测进入临床领域,需要进行标准化。还需要最大限度地从单个样本中获取信息量。我们将通过酶联免疫吸附测定法测量的分泌型白细胞介素4(IL-4)、IL-2、IL-6、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)和γ干扰素蛋白,与通过流式细胞术检测的细胞内细胞因子产生(IL-2和γ干扰素)以及针对IL-2、IL-4、TNF-α和γ干扰素mRNA及cDNA的定量竞争性PCR进行了比较。比较了未刺激细胞以及用佛波醇肉豆蔻酸酯乙酸酯、植物血凝素以及佛波醇肉豆蔻酸酯乙酸酯加植物血凝素刺激的细胞的结果。所有三种方法都检测到了细胞因子产生的显著刺激。总体而言,植物血凝素和佛波醇肉豆蔻酸酯乙酸酯的组合是最有效的刺激物。