• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物流行病学的设计问题

Design issues for drug epidemiology.

作者信息

McMahon A D, MacDonald T M

机构信息

Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Nov;50(5):419-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00289.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00289.x
PMID:11069436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2014406/
Abstract

Despite the difficulties involved in designing drug epidemiology studies, these studies are invaluable for investigating the unexpected adverse effects of drugs. The aim of this paper is to discuss various aspects of study design, particularly those issues that are not easily found in either textbooks or review papers. We have also compared and contrasted drug epidemiology with the randomized controlled trial (RCT) wherever possible. Drug epidemiology is especially useful in the many situations where the RCT is not suitable, or even possible. The study base has to be defined before the appropriate cohort of subjects is assembled. If all of the cases are identified, then a referent sample of controls may be assembled by random sampling of the study base. If all of the cases cannot be assembled, a hypothetical secondary base may need to be created. Preferably, only new-users of the drug should be included, and the risk-ratio will be different for acute users and chronic users. Studies will usually only be possible when researching the unintended effects of drugs. It is difficult to study efficacy because of confounding by indication. In occasional circumstances it may be possible to study efficacy (examples are given). Discussion of the dangers of designing with generalisability in mind is provided. Additionally, the similarities in study design between drug epidemiology and the RCT are discussed in detail, as well as the design-characteristics that cannot be shared between the two methods.

摘要

尽管设计药物流行病学研究存在诸多困难,但这些研究对于调查药物意外的不良反应而言价值非凡。本文旨在探讨研究设计的各个方面,尤其是那些在教科书或综述文章中不易找到的问题。我们还尽可能地对药物流行病学与随机对照试验(RCT)进行了比较和对比。在许多RCT不适用甚至不可行的情况下,药物流行病学尤为有用。在合适的研究对象队列聚集之前,必须先确定研究基础。如果能识别出所有病例,那么可以通过对研究基础进行随机抽样来聚集对照的参考样本。如果无法聚集所有病例,则可能需要创建一个假设的二级基础。最好只纳入药物的新使用者,急性使用者和慢性使用者的风险比会有所不同。通常只有在研究药物的意外效果时研究才可行。由于指征混杂,很难研究疗效。在某些情况下,有可能研究疗效(给出了示例)。文中还讨论了在设计时考虑普遍性的风险。此外,还详细讨论了药物流行病学与RCT在研究设计上的相似之处,以及两种方法无法共享的设计特征。

相似文献

1
Design issues for drug epidemiology.药物流行病学的设计问题
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Nov;50(5):419-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00289.x.
2
Challenges and opportunities for pharmacoepidemiology in drug-therapy decision making.药物治疗决策中药效流行病学面临的挑战与机遇
J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Jan;46(1):6-9. doi: 10.1177/0091270005283285.
3
Approaches to combat with confounding by indication in observational studies of intended drug effects.在预期药物效应的观察性研究中应对适应症混杂问题的方法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003 Oct-Nov;12(7):551-8. doi: 10.1002/pds.883.
4
Pharmacoepidemiology I: a review of pharmacoepidemiologic study designs.药物流行病学I:药物流行病学研究设计综述
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Aug;24(8):964-9. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.11.964.36143.
5
Use of self-controlled designs in pharmacoepidemiology.药物流行病学中自对照设计的应用。
J Intern Med. 2014 Jun;275(6):581-9. doi: 10.1111/joim.12186.
6
Underuse of self-controlled designs in pharmacoepidemiology in electronic healthcare databases: a systematic review.电子医疗保健数据库中药物流行病学自控设计的使用不足:一项系统综述。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):372-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.3955. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
7
Optimal matching ratios in drug safety surveillance.药物安全监测中的最佳匹配率
Epidemiology. 2014 Sep;25(5):772-3. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000148.
8
Observation and experiment with the efficacy of drugs: a warning example from a cohort of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and ulcer-healing drug users.药物疗效的观察与实验:非甾体抗炎药和溃疡愈合药物使用者队列的警示案例
Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Sep 15;154(6):557-62. doi: 10.1093/aje/154.6.557.
9
Use of the self-controlled case-series method in vaccine safety studies: review and recommendations for best practice.应用自身对照病例系列研究方法于疫苗安全性研究:最佳实践的回顾与建议。
Epidemiol Infect. 2011 Dec;139(12):1805-17. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811001531. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
10
The epidemiologic approach to pharmacogenomics.药物基因组学的流行病学方法。
Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2005;5(1):1-20. doi: 10.2165/00129785-200505010-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of secondary stroke subsequent to restarting aspirin in chronic stroke patients suffering from traumatic brain injury in Taiwan.台湾地区因颅脑损伤而慢性卒中患者重启阿司匹林后二次卒中风险。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 17;13(1):8001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34986-z.
2
Real-world therapeutic effectiveness of lorlatinib after alectinib in Japanese patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.阿来替尼治疗后劳拉替尼在日本 ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌患者中的真实世界疗效。
Cancer Sci. 2023 Jun;114(6):2560-2568. doi: 10.1111/cas.15777. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
3
Aminoglycosides use has a risk of acute kidney injury in patients without prior chronic kidney disease.氨基糖苷类药物的使用会导致无慢性肾病病史的患者发生急性肾损伤。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 14;12(1):17212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21074-x.
4
Outcomes for Recurrent Mantle Cell Lymphoma Post-Ibrutinib Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Japanese Administrative Database.伊布替尼治疗后复发套细胞淋巴瘤的结局:来自日本行政数据库的回顾性队列研究。
Adv Ther. 2022 Oct;39(10):4792-4807. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02258-3. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
5
Treatment sequences of patients with advanced colorectal cancer and use of second-line FOLFIRI with antiangiogenic drugs in Japan: A retrospective observational study using an administrative database.日本晚期结直肠癌患者的治疗顺序和二线 FOLFIRI 联合抗血管生成药物的使用:基于行政数据库的回顾性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):e0246160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246160. eCollection 2021.
6
Visual acuity loss and development of ocular complications in white dot syndromes: a longitudinal analysis of 3 centers.白点综合征患者的视力丧失和眼部并发症的发展:3 个中心的纵向分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;257(11):2505-2516. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04429-5. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
7
Re-evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Dabigatran Versus Warfarin in a Nationwide Data Environment: A Prevalent New-User Design Study.在全国性数据环境中重新评估达比加群与华法林的安全性和有效性:一项新用户普遍设计研究。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2019 Sep;6(3):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s40801-019-0156-2.
8
Primary non-adherence and the new-user design.初次治疗不依从性与新用户设计
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):361-364. doi: 10.1002/pds.4403. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
9
Association of Antidepressant Medications With Incident Type 2 Diabetes Among Medicaid-Insured Youths.医疗补助参保青少年中抗抑郁药物与2型糖尿病发病的关联
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Dec 1;171(12):1200-1207. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2896.
10
Development and validation of a multivariate predictive model for rheumatoid arthritis mortality using a machine learning approach.基于机器学习方法的类风湿关节炎死亡率的多变量预测模型的建立和验证。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 31;7(1):10189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10558-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug exposure risk windows and unexposed comparator groups for cohort studies in pharmacoepidemiology.药物流行病学队列研究的药物暴露风险窗口和未暴露对照人群
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1998 Jul;7(4):275-80. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(199807/08)7:4<275::AID-PDS363>3.0.CO;2-N.
2
THE DESIGN AND LOGIC OF A MONITOR OF DRUG USE.药物使用监测仪的设计与逻辑
J Chronic Dis. 1965 Jan;18:77-98. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(65)90054-8.
3
Controls who experienced hypothetical causal intermediates should not be excluded from case-control studies.
Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Sep 15;150(6):547-51. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010051.
4
Methods in health services research. Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies.卫生服务研究方法。解读证据:在随机研究和非随机研究之间做出选择。
BMJ. 1999 Jul 31;319(7205):312-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7205.312.
5
Record-linkage for pharmacovigilance in Scotland.苏格兰药物警戒的记录链接
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Jan;47(1):105-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00853.x.
6
Principles of epidemiological research on adverse and beneficial drug effects.
Lancet. 1998 Nov 28;352(9142):1767-70. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)04350-5.
7
Presentation: Epidemiology and public health: is a new paradigm needed or a new ethic?报告:流行病学与公共卫生:需要一种新范式还是一种新伦理?
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Aug;51(8):637-41. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00021-3.
8
Generalisation and extrapolation.概括与外推。
BMJ. 1998 Aug 8;317(7155):409-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7155.409.
9
Use of the UK General Practice Research Database for pharmacoepidemiology.利用英国全科医疗研究数据库开展药物流行病学研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 May;45(5):419-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00701.x.
10
A study in contrasts: eligibility criteria in a twenty-year sample of NSABP and POG clinical trials. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Program. Pediatric Oncology Group.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Feb;51(2):69-79. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00240-0.