Stotz-Ingenlath G
Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München.
Med Health Care Philos. 2000;3(2):153-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1009919309015.
Eugen Bleuler, in 1911, renamed the group of mental disorders with poor prognosis which Emil Kraepelin had called "dementia praecox" "group of schizophrenias", because for him the splitting of personality was the main symptom. Biographical, scientific and methodological influences on Bleuler's concept of schizophrenia are shown with special reference to Kraepelin and Freud. Bleuler was a passionate and very experienced clinician. He lived with his patients, taking care of them and writing down his observations. Methodologically he was an empiricist and an eclecticist with a wide reading knowledge. In an impaired association of ideas, in disordered affectivity, in marked ambivalence and autism Bleuler saw the main symptoms of schizophrenia. For him these so-called pathological phenomena actually seemed to be only exaggerations of normal psychic functions. So there were only a quantitative, not a qualitative difference between schizophrenia and normal psychic processes and studies on schizophrenic "pathology"--seen as a disturbance, not as a disease--might analogously illustrate normal psychic reactions and vice versa. In etiology as well as in therapy Bleuler took into account psychological and (neuro)physiological (somatic) mechanisms--thus combining organicism and dynamic psychiatry and coming very close to modern concepts, e.g. the one of stress and vulnerability. Bleuler's main merit is the stressing on an idiographic "understanding" of the patient and a plausible and subtle explanation of schizophrenia which helped to reduce the alienation of the affected persons.
尤金·布洛伊勒在1911年将埃米尔·克雷佩林所称的预后不良的精神障碍组“早发性痴呆”重新命名为“精神分裂症组”,因为对他来说,人格分裂是主要症状。本文特别参考了克雷佩林和弗洛伊德,展示了对布洛伊勒精神分裂症概念的传记、科学和方法论影响。布洛伊勒是一位热情且经验丰富的临床医生。他与患者生活在一起,照顾他们并记录下自己的观察结果。在方法论上,他是一个经验主义者和折衷主义者,有着广泛的阅读知识。在观念联想受损、情感紊乱、明显的矛盾情感和孤独症中,布洛伊勒看到了精神分裂症的主要症状。对他来说,这些所谓的病理现象实际上似乎只是正常心理功能的过度表现。因此精神分裂症与正常心理过程之间只有量的差异,而没有质的差异,对精神分裂症“病理学”(被视为一种障碍而非一种疾病)的研究可能类似地说明正常心理反应,反之亦然。在病因学和治疗方面,布洛伊勒都考虑到了心理和(神经)生理(躯体)机制——从而将机体论和动力精神病学结合起来,非常接近现代概念,例如压力与易感性的概念。布洛伊勒的主要功绩在于强调对患者进行个性化的“理解”以及对精神分裂症进行合理而精妙的解释,这有助于减少患者的疏离感。