Pendleton A, Arden N, Dougados M, Doherty M, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma J W, Cluzeau F, Cooper C, Dieppe P A, Günther K P, Hauselmann H J, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kaklamanis P M, Leeb B, Lequesne M, Lohmander S, Mazieres B, Mola E M, Pavelka K, Serni U, Swoboda B, Verbruggen A A, Weseloh G, Zimmermann-Gorska I
Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Dec;59(12):936-44. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.12.936.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease encountered throughout Europe. A task force for the EULAR Standing Committee for Clinical Trials met in 1998 to determine the methodological and logistical approach required for the development of evidence based guidelines for treatment of knee OA. The guidelines were restricted to cover all currently available treatments for knee OA diagnosed either clinically and/or radiographically affecting any compartment of the knee.
The first stage was the selection of treatment modalities to be considered. The second stage comprised a search of the electronic databases Medline and Embase using a combination of subject headings and keywords. All European language publications in the form of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, controlled trials, and observational studies were included. During stage three all the relevant studies were quality scored. The summary statistics for validated outcome measures, when available, were recorded and, where practical, the numbers needed to treat and the effect size for each treatment were calculated. In the fourth stage key clinical propositions were determined by expert consensus employing a Delphi approach. The final stage ranked these propositions according to the available evidence. A second set of propositions relating to a future research agenda was determined by expert consensus using a Delphi approach.
Over 2400 English language publications and 400 non-English language publications were identified. Seven hundred and forty four studies presented outcome data of the effects of specific treatments on knee OA. Quantitative analysis of treatment effect was possible in only 61 studies. Recommendations for the management of knee OA based on currently available data and expert opinion are presented. Proposals for a future research agenda are highlighted.
These are the first clinical guidelines on knee OA to combine an evidence based approach and a consensus approach across a wide range of treatment modalities. It is apparent that certain clinical propositions are supported by substantial research based evidence, while others are not. There is thus an urgent need for future well designed trials to consider key clinical questions.
骨关节炎(OA)是欧洲最常见的关节疾病。欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)临床试验常务委员会的一个特别工作组于1998年召开会议,以确定制定膝关节OA循证治疗指南所需的方法和后勤途径。这些指南仅限于涵盖所有目前可用于临床诊断和/或经放射学诊断、累及膝关节任何部位的膝关节OA的现有治疗方法。
第一阶段是选择要考虑的治疗方式。第二阶段包括使用主题词和关键词组合检索电子数据库Medline和Embase。纳入所有以系统评价、荟萃分析、随机对照试验、对照试验和观察性研究形式发表的欧洲语言出版物。在第三阶段,对所有相关研究进行质量评分。记录有效结局指标的汇总统计数据,如有可能,计算每种治疗的治疗所需人数和效应量。在第四阶段,采用德尔菲法通过专家共识确定关键临床命题。最后阶段根据现有证据对这些命题进行排序。通过德尔菲法由专家共识确定了与未来研究议程相关的第二组命题。
共识别出2400多篇英文出版物和400多篇非英文出版物。744项研究呈现了特定治疗对膝关节OA影响的结局数据。仅61项研究能够进行治疗效果的定量分析。本文基于现有数据和专家意见提出了膝关节OA管理的建议。突出了未来研究议程的建议。
这些是首批关于膝关节OA的临床指南,将循证方法与广泛治疗方式的共识方法相结合。显然,某些临床命题得到了大量基于研究的证据支持,而其他命题则不然。因此,迫切需要未来设计良好的试验来考虑关键临床问题。