Talkner P, Weber RO
General Energy Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland.
Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 2000 Jul;62(1 Pt A):150-60. doi: 10.1103/physreve.62.150.
The variability measures of fluctuation analysis (FA) and detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) are expressed in terms of the power spectral density and of the autocovariance of a given process. The diagnostic potential of these methods is tested on several model power spectral densities. In particular we find that both FA and DFA reveal an algebraic singularity of the power spectral density at small frequencies corresponding to an algebraic decay of the autocovariance. A scaling behavior of the power spectral density in an intermediate frequency regime is better reflected by DFA than by FA. We apply FA and DFA to ambient temperature data from the 20th century with the primary goal to resolve the controversy in literature whether the low frequency behavior of the corresponding power spectral densities are better described by a power law or a stretched exponential. As a third possible model we suggest a Weibull distribution. However, it turns out that neither FA nor DFA can reliably distinguish between the proposed models.
波动分析(FA)和去趋势波动分析(DFA)的变异性度量是根据给定过程的功率谱密度和自协方差来表示的。这些方法的诊断潜力在几种模型功率谱密度上进行了测试。特别是,我们发现FA和DFA都揭示了功率谱密度在低频处的代数奇点,这对应于自协方差的代数衰减。在中频范围内,DFA比FA能更好地反映功率谱密度的标度行为。我们将FA和DFA应用于20世纪的环境温度数据,主要目的是解决文献中关于相应功率谱密度的低频行为用幂律还是拉伸指数更好描述的争议。作为第三种可能的模型,我们提出了威布尔分布。然而,结果表明FA和DFA都不能可靠地区分所提出的模型。