• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Accountability for reasonableness.

作者信息

Daniels N

出版信息

BMJ. 2000 Nov 25;321(7272):1300-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300
PMID:11090498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1119050/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Accountability for reasonableness.合理性问责制。
BMJ. 2000 Nov 25;321(7272):1300-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300.
2
The public health agenda and minority ethnic health: a reflection on priorities.公共卫生议程与少数族裔健康：对优先事项的思考
J R Soc Med. 2006 Feb;99(2):58-61. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900216.
3
A consultation on a strategy for nursing, midwifery and health visiting.关于护理、助产及健康访视策略的咨询。
Nurs Crit Care. 1998 May-Jun;3(3):109-10.
4
The new NHS: commentaries on the white paper. Encouraging responsibility: different paths to accountability. From health care to health.新的国民医疗服务体系：对白皮书的评论。鼓励责任感：实现问责制的不同途径。从医疗保健到健康。
BMJ. 1998 Jan 24;316(7127):300-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7127.300.
5
Clinical freedom and management accountability.临床自主性与管理问责制。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Oct 5;291(6500):982-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6500.982.
6
Accountability for reasonableness: the relevance, or not, of exceptionality in resource allocation.合理性问责制：资源分配中特殊性的相关性与否。
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 May;18(2):217-27. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9592-7.
7
Priority setting in purchasing.采购中的优先级设定。
Br J Hosp Med. 1993;49(3):200-2.
8
The National Service Framework--suggestions about priorities for policy development welcome.国家服务框架——欢迎就政策制定的优先事项提出建议。
Age Ageing. 2002 Sep;31(5):409, 411; author reply 411-2. doi: 10.1093/ageing/31.5.409-a.
9
Where's the beef?牛肉在哪里？
Nurs Times. 1999;95(28):12.
10
Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework.坦桑尼亚分散式医疗保健重点制定：基于合理性问责框架的评估。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(4):751-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.035. Epub 2010 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating IVF Shortages in the Neurocritical Care Unit.应对神经重症监护病房的体外受精短缺问题
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02261-w.
2
The role of the enrolling clinician in emergency research conducted under an exception from informed consent.在根据知情同意豁免进行的急诊研究中，招募临床医生的角色。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2025 Jun;46(3):231-246. doi: 10.1007/s11017-025-09710-9. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
3
Exploring Democratic Deliberation in Public Health: Bridging Division and Enhancing Community Engagement.探索公共卫生领域的民主审议：弥合分歧并加强社区参与。
Am J Public Health. 2025 Apr;115(4):500-505. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307998.
4
An integrated framework to guide evidence-informed public health policymaking.一个指导基于证据的公共卫生政策制定的综合框架。
J Public Health Policy. 2025 Mar;46(1):193-210. doi: 10.1057/s41271-024-00535-9. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
5
The role of health economics within health technology assessment: past, present, and future - an Austrian perspective.卫生经济学在卫生技术评估中的作用：过去、现在和未来——奥地利视角。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 5;40(1):e51. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000503.
6
Guidance for unbiased predictive information for healthcare decision-making and equity (GUIDE): considerations when race may be a prognostic factor.医疗保健决策与公平性的无偏预测信息指南（GUIDE）：种族可能成为预后因素时的考量
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Oct 19;7(1):290. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01245-y.
7
Complex Decision-Making in Paediatric Intensive Care: A Discussion Paper and Suggested Model.儿科重症监护中的复杂决策：一篇讨论文章及建议模型
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Oct 4. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10381-9.
8
Operationalisation of health equity principles in physiotherapy hospital triage policies.将卫生公平原则运用于物理治疗医院分诊政策中。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Aug 21;23(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02249-6.
9
The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Designing the Essential Package of Health Services in Pakistan.利用循证决策过程设计巴基斯坦基本卫生服务包。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8004. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8004. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
10
Costing Interventions for Developing an Essential Package of Health Services: Application of a Rapid Method and Results From Pakistan.成本干预措施制定基本卫生服务包：快速方法的应用及来自巴基斯坦的结果。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8006. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8006. Epub 2024 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers.医疗保健的局限：公平程序、民主审议与保险公司的正当性问题
Philos Public Aff. 1997 Fall;26(4):303-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00082.x.
2
Rationing fairly: programmatic considerations.公平分配：规划方面的考量
Bioethics. 1993 Apr;7(2-3):224-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00288.x.
3
Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study.医学新技术的优先级设定：定性案例研究
BMJ. 2000 Nov 25;321(7272):1316-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1316.
4
NICE: a step forward in the quality of NHS care. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. National Health Service.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所（NICE）：英国国民医疗服务体系（NHS）医疗质量的一大进步。英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所。英国国民医疗服务体系。
Lancet. 1999 Mar 27;353(9158):1028-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)00098-7.
5
The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care.确定优先事项的第二阶段。告别简单解决方案：医疗保健领域确定优先事项的第二阶段。
BMJ. 1998 Oct 10;317(7164):1000-2.
6
The ethics of accountability in managed care reform.管理式医疗改革中的问责伦理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Sep-Oct;17(5):50-64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.5.50.