Suppr超能文献

婴儿出牙与牙齿萌出:一项队列研究。

Teething and tooth eruption in infants: A cohort study.

作者信息

Wake M, Hesketh K, Lucas J

机构信息

Research and Policy Unit, Centre for Community Child Health, Department of Dentistry, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2000 Dec;106(6):1374-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.6.1374.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Many symptoms are attributed to teething in infants. There is little evidence to support these beliefs, despite their implications for clinical management. We investigated relationships between tooth eruption, fever, and teething symptoms.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one children 6 to 24 months old attending 3 suburban long-day care centers >/=3 days/week. Measures. 1) Daily temperature recording and examination of alveolar ridges for tooth eruption (dental therapist). 2) Daily questionnaires-symptoms over preceding 24 hours (staff and parents independently). 3) Final questionnaire-beliefs/experiences related to teething (parents). Definitions. Eruption day-the first day a tooth could be seen or felt. Non-toothdays-more than 28 days clear of any eruption day. Toothdays-the 5 days preceding eruption days.

RESULTS

Data were collected for 236 toothdays and 895 non-toothdays pertaining to 90 teeth. Child temperatures were similar on toothdays and non-toothdays (36.21 vs 36.18, paired t test). Logistic regression adjusted for age did not show an association between toothdays and temperature (odds ratio [OR] = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80, 2.27 for high fever; OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 0.48, 3.77 for low fever). Logistic regression models allowing for within-child cluster effects and age were fitted to daily staff and parent reports of mood, wellness/illness, drooling/dribbling, sleep, diarrhea, strong diapers, red cheeks, and rashes/flushing. Only parent-reported (but not staff-reported) loose stools were significantly associated with tooth eruption (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1. 26, 2.73). When the toothday definition was varied to 10 days preceding or 5 days surrounding tooth eruption, this single significant association was no longer apparent (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 0.98, 2.05 and OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 0.97, 2.21, respectively). All parents retrospectively reported that their own children had suffered a range of teething symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not confirm the expected strong associations between tooth eruption and a range of teething symptoms in children 6 to 30 months old, although we cannot rule out the possibility that weak associations may exist (Type II error). These findings contrast with strong parent and professional beliefs to the contrary. Such beliefs may preclude optimal management of common patterns of illness and behavior in young children.teething, infants, symptoms, tooth eruption, illness.

摘要

目的

许多症状被归因于婴儿出牙。尽管这些观念对临床管理有影响,但几乎没有证据支持这些观念。我们研究了牙齿萌出、发热和出牙症状之间的关系。

方法

前瞻性队列研究。

参与者

21名6至24个月大的儿童,他们每周至少3天在3个郊区的全日制日托中心。测量方法:1)每日记录体温,并由牙科治疗师检查牙槽嵴以确定牙齿萌出情况。2)每日问卷——询问前24小时的症状(工作人员和家长分别填写)。3)最终问卷——询问与出牙相关的观念/经历(家长填写)。定义:萌出日——能看到或摸到牙齿的第一天。无牙日——连续超过28天没有任何牙齿萌出。出牙前5日——萌出日前的5天。

结果

收集了与90颗牙齿相关的236个出牙前5日和895个无牙日的数据。出牙前5日和无牙日儿童的体温相似(配对t检验,分别为36.21和36.18)。经年龄调整的逻辑回归未显示出牙前5日与体温之间存在关联(高热的优势比[OR]=1.35,95%置信区间[CI]=0.80,2.27;低热的OR=1.34,95%CI=0.48,3.77)。针对工作人员和家长每日报告的情绪、健康/疾病、流口水、睡眠、腹泻、尿布疹、脸颊发红和皮疹/潮红情况,拟合了考虑儿童内部聚类效应和年龄的逻辑回归模型。只有家长报告(而非工作人员报告)的腹泻与牙齿萌出显著相关(OR=1.86,95%CI=1.26,2.73)。当将出牙前5日的定义改为萌出前10日或萌出前后5日时,这一单一显著关联不再明显(OR分别为1.42,95%CI=0.98,2.05和OR=1.47,95%CI=0.97,2.21)。所有家长回顾性报告称他们自己的孩子曾出现一系列出牙症状。

结论

本研究未证实6至30个月大儿童牙齿萌出与一系列出牙症状之间存在预期的强关联,尽管我们不能排除可能存在弱关联的可能性(II类错误)。这些发现与家长和专业人士的强烈相反观念形成对比。此类观念可能会妨碍对幼儿常见疾病和行为模式的最佳管理。出牙、婴儿、症状、牙齿萌出、疾病

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验