Guedeney N, Fermanian J, Guelfi J D, Kumar R C
Infant unit, Department of Psychiatry, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 Bd Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France.
J Affect Disord. 2000 Dec;61(1-2):107-12. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00186-x.
This paper presents a phenomenological study of three false negative cases according to the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) of major depressive disorder identified by a semi-structured clinical interview. In a study of 87 unselected women with 23 of them suffering from a major depressive disorder (according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria), three cases of major depressive disorders were not identified as potential cases by the EPDS. The symptomatology of these three false negative cases was also assessed by a semi-structured interview (Present State Examination). Comparisons between EPDS scores and the scores of two other self report questionnaires (the General Health Questionnaire-28 and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale) suggest that EPDS is better at identifying depressed postnatal women with anhedonic and anxious symptomatology rather than those whose depression presents mainly with psychomotor retardation.
本文呈现了一项现象学研究,该研究针对通过半结构化临床访谈确诊为重度抑郁症的三个根据爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)判定为假阴性的病例。在一项针对87名未经筛选的女性的研究中(其中23名患有重度抑郁症,依据研究诊断标准),有三例重度抑郁症病例未被EPDS识别为潜在病例。这三个假阴性病例的症状学也通过半结构化访谈(现状检查)进行了评估。EPDS得分与另外两份自我报告问卷(一般健康问卷-28和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表)得分之间的比较表明,EPDS在识别具有快感缺失和焦虑症状的产后抑郁女性方面比识别那些主要表现为精神运动迟缓的抑郁女性更有效。