Suppr超能文献

儿童行为检查表(CBCL)综合征在三大洲的跨文化普遍性:从美国、荷兰到澳大利亚。

Cross-cultural generalizability of CBCL syndromes across three continents: from the USA and Holland to Australia.

作者信息

Heubeck B G

机构信息

Division of Psychology, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.

出版信息

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2000 Oct;28(5):439-50. doi: 10.1023/a:1005131605891.

Abstract

The study asked how well Achenbach's 8-factor cross-informant model for the Child Behavior Check-list (Achenbach, 1991a, 1991b, 1991c) fits clinic data in the USA, Holland, and Australia. DeGroot et al.'s Dutch 8-factor model (DeGroot, Koot, & Verhulst 1994) was also tested for its cross-cultural generalizability. Achenbach's matched clinical sample data (N = 2110) were analyzed and contrasted with the previously reported Dutch findings (N = 2335), as well as a new data set collected on clinic referred children and adolescents in Australia (N = 2237). Confirmatory factor analyses supported the Dutch as much as the American model in the USA, Holland, and Australia. Although about 90% of items showed convergent validity across models and countries, the attention and especially the social problems factor found least support. Most double loadings in the current models were not upheld. Instead, additional analyses discovered a number of unmodelled loadings including many cross-loadings. This led to the redefinition of the social problems factor as a mean aggression factor (with associated social problems) whereas the original aggression factor focuses on emotional acting out and the delinquent factor describes an evasive, covert type of antisocial behavior. Overall most support was obtained for the withdrawn, somatic, anxious/depressed, thought problems, and aggressive factors.

摘要

该研究探讨了阿肯巴克儿童行为检查表的8因素跨 informant 模型(阿肯巴克,1991a,1991b,1991c)在美国、荷兰和澳大利亚的临床数据中的拟合程度。德格鲁特等人的荷兰8因素模型(德格鲁特、库特和费尔胡尔斯特,1994)也进行了跨文化通用性测试。对阿肯巴克匹配的临床样本数据(N = 2110)进行了分析,并与先前报告的荷兰研究结果(N = 2335)以及在澳大利亚收集的关于临床转诊儿童和青少年的新数据集(N = 2237)进行了对比。验证性因素分析表明,在美国、荷兰和澳大利亚,荷兰模型与美国模型得到的支持程度相当。尽管约90%的项目在不同模型和国家间显示出收敛效度,但注意力因素,尤其是社会问题因素得到的支持最少。当前模型中的大多数双重负荷未得到支持。相反,进一步分析发现了一些未建模的负荷,包括许多交叉负荷。这导致将社会问题因素重新定义为平均攻击因素(伴有相关社会问题),而原来的攻击因素侧重于情绪爆发,违纪因素描述的是一种逃避、隐蔽的反社会行为类型。总体而言,退缩、躯体、焦虑/抑郁、思维问题和攻击因素得到的支持最多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验